Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 5 Oct 2006 21:07 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:11:14 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? >> >> Not only is it a threat, but it has already begun to >> alter my lifestyle. My goal is to ensure that it >> alter 100% of my lifestyle, if I'm allowed to exist. > >Tell me more about this threat you perceive. > >What exactly is it that you're afraid of ? > You're an idiot. One fear is that there are too many complacent idiots, *just like you*, and that there numbers will cause the economies of the world to have roller-coaster repercussions. Ooops... too late.
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 21:09 Daniel Mandic wrote: > John Fields wrote: > > > My reference to not speaking English as a first language was a > > euphemism for being conquered, which was related to an earlier post > > by Graham stating that had the US not become involved in WW2, > > England and Germany might have teamed up to fight Russia after > > Germany double-crossed Russia. In my opinion that would have been > > suicide for England, as depleted as it would have been, when Russia > > came rolling in to get Germany. > > > > So yes, the question was loaded, but it wasn't Monday morning > > quarterbacking. Monday morning quarterbacking would have been more > > like: "If only Germany had done thus and such, she would have won." > > What things do you write about. My dear, your insights of the Human > history is reduced to a period of 7 years, yes? > > C'mon, let's get some million years back..... America's only got a couple of hundred years of history. It makes them dizzy thinking much further back. Graham
From: Daniel Mandic on 5 Oct 2006 21:08 Kurt Ullman wrote: > > > > > > in the general direction (with a forewarning to > > > Pakistan) is not an "attempt to get OBL", just an attempt to show > > > that "something is being done". > > > > It's still 100% more than GWB ever did. > > > Yep GWB never did get around to clearing out the Taliban and > exiling him to mountains at the border. Staple one madness over the next madness, makes the madnessin the first forget. China was a good example, bez they are known that no one would attack them. I would suggest the UAS AREMEE to go there and care for rights, HUHman rights. Hahaha, you would get cold feet :-), erm... suggest to the US Governement. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 21:11 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote > > > > I see terrorist attack doesn't make the top twenty then :-) That war on > > tobacco really needs to get started soon. > > It has, thankfully. Most major cities in the US ban tobacco use in public > places, and several states are considering state-wide bans. Still perfectly > legal at home and in most places outdoors, but at least I can eat dinner in > a restaurant without smoke making me physically ill. I can barely wait for the UK law banning smoking in public places to come into effect. It'll be so much nicer. Graham
From: JoeBloe on 5 Oct 2006 21:10
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:16:50 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >> >> >> >> >Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling >> a >> >> >criticism "unacceptable." >> >> >> >> Which criticism was unacceptable? >> > >> >Watch this. >> >> I can't. I'm not going to the library for this one. > >Why do you need to go to the library ? > >Graham Idiot! For someone that claims to have been in these groups for so long, I find it had to believe (not) that you are oblivious as to whom /BAH is. |