Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Daniel Mandic on 5 Oct 2006 20:16 Eeyore wrote: > It's so utterly insane that I'm inclined to find a way to campaign > against such crass Republican stupidity. > > Graham Aaaah, you mean this utterly disgusting-looklike, stupid short-hats....? Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: lucasea on 5 Oct 2006 20:20 <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:jggVg.7734$TV3.3307(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com... > > "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:oNfVg.51684$E67.19559(a)clgrps13... >> >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >> news:r3fVg.8959$GR.3051(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... >> >>> Some linguists even interpret the shifts in England as related to >>> blueblood Londoners putting on airs, and that accent subsequently >>> catching on in other parts of the country. I suspect this last part is >>> a bit of a stretch, but the whole thing is an interesting thesis. I >>> find it fascinating to think about how people spoke in the past, and how >>> language has evolved. Puts a whole new perspective in the various new >>> inner-city lexicons and pronunciations that have developed, even in my >>> lifetime. >> >> Read "The Mother Tongue" by Bill Bryson. > > I've written almost everything he's written. I love his very odd > combination of American and British humor. It's kind of > over-the-top-subtle. D'oh! Obviously I meant "I've read almost everything he's written." Eric Lucas
From: JoeBloe on 5 Oct 2006 20:27 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:45:39 -0500, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: >On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:47:30 +0100, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>John Fields wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >>> >> T Wake wrote: >>> >> > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >>> >> >> T Wake wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> The same reason unthinking Muslims support groups considered terrorist by >>> >> >>> the west. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Is Hezbollah a terrorist organisation ? >>> >> > >>> >> > If you are asking my opinion..... then yes. A nasty, ruthless one. However >>> >> > sometimes terrorists seem to come in from the cold. >>> >> >>> >> That's the point at which they've won. >>> > >>> >Looks like they won in that case. >>> >>> --- >>> A skirmish, perhaps, but not the war. >> >>Israel can only 'win' by erasing Lebanon. > >--- >Trying to set up another straw man? >--- > >>Is that what you want ? > >--- >Nope, but since you state that that's the only way Israel can win, >it seems that if you don't want Israel destroyed, that's what >_you're_ advocating. > >In reality, though, your preferred "solution" would be to see Israel >("The Real Demon" according to you) destroyed, and yet you pretend >to advocate non-violence. > >How can you reconcile that hypocrisy? I can't wait to see this one get answered. I'll bet he dodges it. Hey! Donkey boy! We don't want the polygraph answer, donkey boy... We want the long, technical response. That is... if you have the character for it. You already lost any honor you ever had. Good one, John.
From: JoeBloe on 5 Oct 2006 20:29 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:49:33 -0500, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: >On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:48:51 +0100, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> > lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>> >>> >>Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling >>> >>a criticism "unacceptable." >>> > >>> > Which criticism was unacceptable? >>> > >>> > I don't understand you people; first you complain that he can't >>> > think for himself; then, you object when he expresses his opinion about >>> > something. >>> > >>> > You can't have it both ways. >>> >>> Calling "criticism" "unacceptable" is not an opinion--it's an >>> argument-winning tactic that involves tacitly silencing anybody who >>> disagrees with you. >> >>Criticism was considered unacceptable in 1930s Germany too. > >--- >If the parallel is valid, expect to hear someone knocking on your >door because of your antics here. Ooooooohhhh.... That would be so.... R I G H T E O U S !!! I'd love to see the video on Cops!
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 20:32
T Wake wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > > T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > >> > T Wake wrote: > >> > > >> >> Planes to the US are becoming a joke now, all because of four domestic > >> >> flights being taken over. How many flights take off each day? > >> > > >> > Taken over ? > >> > > >> > I don't think a single one has been 'taken over'. > >> > >> Hmm. Pedantry again. What terminology would you use to describe the > >> actions of the terrorists who flew the planes into the world trade centre? > >> > >> Did they not "take over" the plane? Was it not a domestic flight? > >> > >> I may be mistaken, and I often am. > > > > You said 'to the US' not 'in the US' so I took it to mean international > > flights. > > Sorry, I meant the flights going to the US were a joke, because four > domestic US flights had been taken over. On re-reading I got it. > The idea was to highlight the > foolishness of the resulting "Airport Security" actions. Interesting > (related) article linked to from this page - > http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2006/09/28/slashdot-effect-still-working/ Ridiculous ! God Bless American fucktards ! Graham |