Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 5 Oct 2006 21:12 On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:22:17 -0400, Keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >In article <eg335h$5l0$10(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker(a)emory.edu >says... >> In article <eg2od9$8qk_004(a)s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >In article <VAVUg.13310$7I1.3298(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, >> > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >>news:452415BE.DB0DBC1E(a)hotmail.com... >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Keith wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> >>>> >> >>>> > And you think you can defeat 'radical Islam' with bombs and bullets ? >> >>>> >> >>>> I know there is no choice. Perhaps you want to submit? >> >>> >> >>> There is no need to 'submit' >> >>> >> >>> You're living in a perversely stupid fantasy paranoid world. >> >> >> >>It comes from the constant bombardment by Bush's fear-mongering--it's his >> >>way of keeping power over people. >> > >> >I think you should start to listen to Bush instead of listening >> >to other people supposedly repeating what Bush said. I would >> >suggest you start with his January, 2006 TV speech. >> > >> >> People start to lose perspective on what >> >>is happening and why. It really is a very powerful narcotic. >> > >> >People can also lose perspective if they assume that Bush >> >is always wrong >> >> So what has he been right about? >> >> >and is the cause of all ills which is the >> >only thing you hear from his political opposition. >> > >> >This causes a lot of people to overlook the fact that these >> >same politicians do not intend to deal with the threat >> >to the nation. >> > >> >> Bush has increased the threat. His own NIE says so. > >You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was >leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages >around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite. >Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken. Good one.
From: Daniel Mandic on 5 Oct 2006 21:12 <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ...integrated over the history of the automobile, it's within a > factor of two of 3 orders of magnitude. It's closer to 3 orders of > magnitude than 2 or 4. Sheesh, in case you missed my point, driving > a car is vastly more of a threat to society than is terrorism. > > Eric Lucas It's getting better......... at this precise moment. (I like this English vernaculars, sorry ;)) :-| Tomorrow? Next day? A year? ..the Day Ciao, Daniel Mandic
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 21:15 JoeBloe wrote: > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:11:14 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >What exactly is it that you're afraid of ? > > You're an idiot. You failure to communicate using the English language is noted. Graham
From: lucasea on 5 Oct 2006 21:15 "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:2fhVg.51722$E67.4255(a)clgrps13... > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > news:AY2dnTM9F40PA7jYRVnyvw(a)pipex.net... > >>>> I see terrorist attack doesn't make the top twenty then :-) That war on >>>> tobacco really needs to get started soon. >>> >>> WHAT!! How dare you! Why, some of our finest congress things are >>> supported by the good folks that make cigarettes. >> >> :-) Fair point. Let us declare war on the things which kill less people >> then >> >> Who is up for the war on fruit flies? > > They banned the hell out of lawn darts - for sure. Those damn things *were* terrorist weapons! :^) Fun, though. "Here kid, time to learn a new sport--the javelin catch. Go long." Eric Lucas
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 21:16
Daniel Mandic wrote: > Kurt Ullman wrote: > > > > > in the general direction (with a forewarning to > > > > Pakistan) is not an "attempt to get OBL", just an attempt to show > > > > that "something is being done". > > > > > > It's still 100% more than GWB ever did. > > > > > Yep GWB never did get around to clearing out the Taliban and > > exiling him to mountains at the border. > > Staple one madness over the next madness, makes the madnessin the first > forget. China was a good example, bez they are known that no one would > attack them. > > I would suggest the UAS AREMEE to go there and care for rights, HUHman > rights. Hahaha, you would get cold feet :-), > erm... suggest to the US Governement. Too right ! They won't invade N. Korea either. Graham |