From: Michael A. Terrell on 12 Oct 2006 16:33 John Fields wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:29:56 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >John Fields wrote: > > > >> I mean, I can't recall a single post where you've had anything good > >> to say about America or Americans, can you? > > > >There's precious little left worth saying good about. > > --- > Try. There must be _something_ you like about us or this great big > beautiful country we live in, no? Eeyore is across the ocean, and out of our hair? -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: lucasea on 12 Oct 2006 16:36 "Jonathan Kirwan" <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote in message news:5c8ti2lbq7o5gcbgppc77p6ge571t7ekdf(a)4ax.com... > > Something is seriously, deeply, pervasively wrong in that party now. I would have agreed with you several months ago. However, they seem to be distancing themselves from the most pathological part of the party, the part in the White House. In about another 6 months, we'll see if that is just election-year rhetoric, or if they actually do believe that the White House has got it wrong. Eric Lucas
From: John Fields on 12 Oct 2006 16:56 On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:41:18 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk wrote: > >> The vast majority of >> Islamic people are peace loving - only a very tiny minority are >> terrorists. But if you persecute them all for their religion I expect >> you can change that. > >This concept seems to be lost on the USA sadly. --- Really? How many of the approximately seven million Muslims who live in the US are being religiously persecuted? Data from an authoritative source, please. Your opinion is immaterial. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 12 Oct 2006 17:00 On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:43:47 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk wrote: > >> It seems that in America you can now be attacked on an aircraft for >> having a suntan and an iPod (as happened to a top UK jet set architect >> fairly recently). I cannot understand why the gung-ho idiot that >> assaulted him was not arrested when the plane touched down (unless of >> course he was a sky marshall). >> >> http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article1777847.ece >> >> This guy is rich enough to get justice out of the American legal system >> so that's OK. > >Jesus HC. And he was *Jewish* too ! > >" To the applause of fellow passengers, the Jewish designer was escorted from a >New York flight as a potential bomber. " > >America has a heck of a lot to answer for. --- To whom? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 12 Oct 2006 17:05
T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > >>> I was paid very well for a long time to be 100% paranoid. I was > >>> an expert in anticipating everything that can go wrong and how > >>> to prevent it or minimize the damage. The fact that > >>> you are able to post in this electronic medium is due to people > >>> like me who did this work. > >> > >>That's a pretty extravagant claim. > > > > Put in your pipe and stuff it. Perhaps you should learn who > > I am. > > If you wanted to trade of your identity and status then you need to tell > people it or hope they recognise your position from the quality of the > information you post.. This is USENET. I could claim to be Tony Blair if I > wanted to. And I'm Eeyore the donkey. |