Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 12 Oct 2006 19:43 On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:11:39 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >That's a pretty extravagant claim. >> >> Put in your pipe and stuff it. Perhaps you should learn who >> I am. > >And how would that change things ? > >Why's it such a secret anyway ? > You're an idiot. It's obvious. *I* do not even know her, but by her post, I can guess what she did, and where she worked. The fact that you cannot just proves how much in the dark you really are.
From: JoeBloe on 12 Oct 2006 19:44 On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:04:25 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Which you have never shown. It is evident, however, how little you know about what is going on.
From: JoeBloe on 12 Oct 2006 19:45 On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:05:43 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >And I'm Eeyore the donkey. > You are "The DonkTard"!!!
From: JoeBloe on 12 Oct 2006 19:47 On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:22:18 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >I currently work in providing security advice to companies and in my >experience, while there is some basis for the "paranoia" approach, most of >the time it does not make sound business advice. Do you even know what the term "COMSEC" means? If not, I have my doubts as to your efficacy in what you claim is your occupation. Hahaha... come on, dipshit... knock our socks off!
From: JoeBloe on 12 Oct 2006 19:51
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:52:33 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >Really? Are you sure about that? I suspect, strongly, that you are wrong. > More proof that you spend your life guessing as you go. |