Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Lloyd Parker on 18 Oct 2006 06:38 In article <009aj2dksthbu9fopngsr64nhfofi1dnjl(a)4ax.com>, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Tue, 17 Oct 06 12:40:58 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>In article <odi8j25ttpiuu9t6tbg4jne9cdut88qmin(a)4ax.com>, >> John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:38:14 +0100, Eeyore >>><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Lloyd Parker wrote: >>>> >>>>> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > All of Islam (read the moslems) believe that all others that are not >>>>> >moslem are "infidels" and that killing them is not, nor should not be >>>>> >a crime. >>>>> >>>>> You are lying. >>>> >>>>I suspect it's what he learnt at Church. >>>> >>>>American Christian fundamentalists are as dangerous if not more so than >>their >>>>Muslim counterparts. >>>> >>> >>>Yeah, all those Southern Baptist suicide bombers. >> >>Sigh! Wait. If this gets results it will be tried. >>Have you not noticed what's been happening lately? >>And it's not just Southern Baptist. >> > >Judiasism and Christianity have generally considered suicide to be a >sin. Radical Islam considers it to be a holy act. It also helps get >rid of the young males, making the world safe for lecherous old-fart >polygamists. > >John > See the "Jesus Camp" movie.
From: Lloyd Parker on 18 Oct 2006 06:54 In article <eh54ge$8qk_011(a)s847.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >In article <e9ednZ8s0K3l2ajYRVnyuA(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>news:4535424A.C08609A3(a)hotmail.com... >>> >>> >>> T Wake wrote: >>> >>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>>> >>>> > Certainly a lot of the details of Darwin's theories have been subject >>>> > to >>>> > question and modification over the years. What has not changed is the >>>> > basic idea of evolution. >>>> >>>> Very true. There is a conflict of terminology and if the people on the >>>> radio >>>> show were talking about "Darwin's theories" specifically they are a bit >>>> behind the curve. Modern evolutionary theory has progressed beyond the >>>> specifics Darwin described. >>> >>> I've noticed that there is now a common tendency for those who reckon they >>> know >>> better to dismiss such things as 'just theories' as if that meant they had >>> no >>> vailidity ! >> >> >>I love that phrase "just theories." It really makes me smile when some >>creationist goes on about how "evolution is just a theory." >> >>Like Newtonian Gravity isn't "just" a theory. :-) > >Yes. It is just a theory. It is the human race's best >guess at how nature and its laws work. > >Fundamentalists understand the difference between just a theory >and their belief. They get threatened when teachers of their >kids present evolution as a belief; It isn't. It's taught in science class as a scientific fact, which it is. > the implication of this >is that the goal of teaching evolution is to substitute >the religion known as evolution for the religion of God. Oh, BS. > >Listen to some of the idiots who are teaching el-hi science. > >/BAH > Can't be more BS than what you just posted.
From: Eeyore on 18 Oct 2006 11:05 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > As for Europe, I'm not hearing much discussions about this > either. What I do hear is capitulations so that they > get their oil deliveries. Utter drivel. > Now this bais of the news may > be due to media bias; I don't know but I'll find out. It could well be US media bias. Why not start listening to and watching the BBC ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 18 Oct 2006 11:06 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >On Tue, 17 Oct 06 11:50:44 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >>Pushing in certain areas is not the best way to prevent future > >>messes. I've found that the only way for people to learn how > >>not make new messes is to have them clean up the ones they > >>already made. > >> > > > >Excellent. Care to assign cleanup duties in the Middle East and > >Africa? > > France would get a primary assignment with extreme adult > supervision. Why France ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 18 Oct 2006 11:08
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > > >>>Religious extremism is always the result of one of the following: > >>> > >>>A) Insanity > >>> > >>>B) Desire for power, control, and wealth > >>> > >> > >> None of the above. Fear. Pure, simple terror. > > > >OK, if you must, then "fear of losing power, control and wealth". Witness > >the fear-mongering among the Religious Right in the current election > >campaign. > > I am. More alarming is the message of the Democrats who keep implying > that there isn't any problem. The speeches say that Bush is lying > about the existence of this national threat. What do you think > most people would conclude from a statement like that? Maybe they're [the Democrats] right ? Bush is a proven liar after all. Graham |