Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 28 Oct 2006 22:40 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > You should, however, have a big problem with her assuming she knows what > you're *going* to say. It's precisely why she never hears anything from > either political party that would contradict her wacky black-and-white > worldview--she simply already knows what they're going to say, and doesn't > actually bother to listen to what they *do* say. Ditto with what she > already knows the terrorists are going to say. The two jackasses Wake & Lucas bray in unison mostly. Listen guys, you're nothing but a pair of punk anti-Americans picking on a woman who has some good ideas, some bad ideas, and some occasional genius thrown in for good measure. You aren't bright enough to recognize the difference because you're in attack mode having flushed your brains away. Not one thing you've written in this thread holds water when taken in context. Lucas, you're especially idiotic every time you try to grab what you see as a debating style "win." Not one of them has been. You're clearly a verboise idiot. You need to go get someone to dry behind your ears for you as you're incompetent to take care of yourself. The pair of you have provided nothing of value here, and indeed have proved to be beyond disgusting. I see no need in, having returned temporarily from my trip, continuing to read what either of you present on usenet. It is all 100% canned and recycled rhetoric to which neither of you managed to add a single new idea, and beyond that you're highly repetitive. So you're having fun and you think that makes all this OK. It doesn't. BAH, you're wasting you time on these fools, but if it amuses you......
From: unsettled on 28 Oct 2006 22:46 Eeyore wrote: > T Wake wrote: >>I am starting to build a mental image of /BAH as a sort of survivalist, >>living in a log cabin with a shotgun and a computer built out of twigs. >>It would go a long way to explaining some things said here. > It would. > I'm still perpelexed by the idea that thinks she's some important big shot. LOL, she's not the only one, however. Such matters are so far beyond you clowns that it's laughable you even try.
From: Eeyore on 29 Oct 2006 03:01 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > >>> You people are not thinking! Scenario: oil imports stop. > >> > >>So who's going to be buying the oil instead of the USA ? Where did the oil > go ? > > > > If production hasn't been stopped, China, India, and parts of Europe > > in exchange for capitulation. > > They're suddenly going to increase their oil consumption by over a factor of > 10??? BAH's 'critical thinking' is somewhat flawed ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 29 Oct 2006 03:12 unsettled wrote: > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > > > You should, however, have a big problem with her assuming she knows what > > you're *going* to say. It's precisely why she never hears anything from > > either political party that would contradict her wacky black-and-white > > worldview--she simply already knows what they're going to say, and doesn't > > actually bother to listen to what they *do* say. Ditto with what she > > already knows the terrorists are going to say. > > The two jackasses Wake & Lucas bray in unison > mostly. > > Listen guys, you're nothing but a pair of punk > anti-Americans picking on a woman who has some > good ideas, some bad ideas, and some occasional > genius thrown in for good measure. You aren't > bright enough to recognize the difference because > you're in attack mode having flushed your brains > away. Excuse me ! BAH is living in a fantasy world so far removed from reality it begs belief ! I guess that means you must be too. Graham
From: Eeyore on 29 Oct 2006 03:13
unsettled wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > T Wake wrote: > > >>I am starting to build a mental image of /BAH as a sort of survivalist, > >>living in a log cabin with a shotgun and a computer built out of twigs. > > >>It would go a long way to explaining some things said here. > > > It would. > > > I'm still perpelexed by the idea that thinks she's some important big shot. > > LOL, she's not the only one, however. Such matters are so > far beyond you clowns that it's laughable you even try. Projection. Graham |