Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: mmeron on 29 Oct 2006 23:23 In article <a40$454574f4$4fe7775$26267(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> In article <cb1d3$45452d8a$4fe72af$23817(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: > >snip > >>>Keep on ignoring all of history folks. I'll be investing in uranium >>>futures. > >> Actually, lead futures may be a better bet. > >Tin foil hat futures have had a very good run, but >it looks like they'll be winding down. > Yes, I guess so. >Lead and unranium it is then. > Less than cheerful prospects. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
From: jmfbahciv on 30 Oct 2006 07:47 In article <ci1ak2lj6o2r74e8mrqsoerep3ck8mmm0c(a)4ax.com>, Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: >On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:57:10 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>> You are only counting interruptions. YOu also need to include >>> long-term effects. >> >>Yeah, and as much as you keep parroting that, you surely must be able to >>come up with some *quantified* long-term effects. Hint: they're minimal. > >The report _did_ include long term effects. If only jmfbahciv would >read it. How can a report specify effects that haven't happened yet? /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 30 Oct 2006 07:51 In article <cb1d3$45452d8a$4fe72af$23817(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >snip > >> Nothing about annihilation of western civilization is amusing. >> This is serious business and it will take another three massive >> killings before the insane politicians are thrown out and >> ones who are willing to deal with problem constructively are >> put back in power. > >Those who persist in denying the announced and obvious >end up driving the defensive system towards an eventual >dictatorial authority. > >Hitler's Mein Kampf was not a secret. The agenda was >mapped out in advance. Militant Islam has been advocating >against the west for decades. Despite the protestations >of some, it is a religion spread by violence and has been >from the day that Mohammed decided he was heading up a >new religion. > >If we look at British conduct in the face of Hitler's >growing menace, we see the same sorts of appeasement >as is being promoted in these related threads. In the >case of Britain, they eventually put Churchill in >charge. He was one of those "last choice" sorts of >men that the appeasers disdained. They historically >worked hard to derail him but there came a moment >of truth when they were finally unable to deny the >realities facing them any longer, and needed a >strong man to drive them towards victory. By that >time they were in trouble, so America was pulled >into the fray, with its own dictator style president >at the helm replaced eventually (after death) by a >sleeper sort of a strong man who didn't hesitate to >use the atomic bomb to end the Pacific war. > >How many today would have the nerve to actually use a >nuclear weapon? Certainly none of the appeasers here >want that to happen, but by their actions they're >driving the system towards the point where other >options will cease to exist. > >Unfortunately, with the sorts of "good human beings" >we're encountering in this newsgroup, we'll probably >evenually get to the point where we'll have to use >our own final solution to the problem by using nukes. > >History has taught us that it is a much smaller mess >if you take care of business and protect yourself >early in the game, rather than late. Keep on ignoring >all of history folks. I'll be investing in uranium >futures. Thank you. You write better than I do. Very nicely written. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 30 Oct 2006 07:52 In article <Lga1h.2227$s6.11(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >news:cb1d3$45452d8a$4fe72af$23817(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> snip >> >>> Nothing about annihilation of western civilization is amusing. >>> This is serious business and it will take another three massive >>> killings before the insane politicians are thrown out and >>> ones who are willing to deal with problem constructively are >>> put back in power. >> >> Those who persist in denying the announced and obvious >> end up driving the defensive system towards an eventual >> dictatorial authority. >> >> Hitler's Mein Kampf was not a secret. The agenda was >> mapped out in advance. Militant Islam has been advocating >> against the west for decades. Despite the protestations >> of some, it is a religion spread by violence and has been >> from the day that Mohammed decided he was heading up a >> new religion. >> >> If we look at British conduct in the face of Hitler's >> growing menace, we see the same sorts of appeasement >> as is being promoted in these related threads. In the >> case of Britain, they eventually put Churchill in >> charge. He was one of those "last choice" sorts of >> men that the appeasers disdained. They historically >> worked hard to derail him but there came a moment >> of truth when they were finally unable to deny the >> realities facing them any longer, and needed a >> strong man to drive them towards victory. By that >> time they were in trouble, so America was pulled >> into the fray, with its own dictator style president >> at the helm replaced eventually (after death) by a >> sleeper sort of a strong man who didn't hesitate to >> use the atomic bomb to end the Pacific war. >> >> How many today would have the nerve to actually use a >> nuclear weapon? Certainly none of the appeasers here >> want that to happen, but by their actions they're >> driving the system towards the point where other >> options will cease to exist. >> >> Unfortunately, with the sorts of "good human beings" >> we're encountering in this newsgroup, we'll probably >> evenually get to the point where we'll have to use >> our own final solution to the problem by using nukes. >> >> History has taught us that it is a much smaller mess >> if you take care of business and protect yourself >> early in the game, rather than late. Keep on ignoring >> all of history folks. I'll be investing in uranium >> futures. > >BAH--this is a new low for you. Self-congratulation and attacking other >posters by using another screen name. Huh? I can't write that well. You will assume any posture just to avoid the facts of what is really going on. I don't know how to deal with this kind of insanity. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 30 Oct 2006 07:54
In article <3cb9f$45454f12$4fe7132$24830(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >> news:cb1d3$45452d8a$4fe72af$23817(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>snip >>> >>> >>>>Nothing about annihilation of western civilization is amusing. >>>>This is serious business and it will take another three massive >>>>killings before the insane politicians are thrown out and >>>>ones who are willing to deal with problem constructively are >>>>put back in power. >>> >>>Those who persist in denying the announced and obvious >>>end up driving the defensive system towards an eventual >>>dictatorial authority. >>> >>>Hitler's Mein Kampf was not a secret. The agenda was >>>mapped out in advance. Militant Islam has been advocating >>>against the west for decades. Despite the protestations >>>of some, it is a religion spread by violence and has been >>>from the day that Mohammed decided he was heading up a >>>new religion. >>> >>>If we look at British conduct in the face of Hitler's >>>growing menace, we see the same sorts of appeasement >>>as is being promoted in these related threads. In the >>>case of Britain, they eventually put Churchill in >>>charge. He was one of those "last choice" sorts of >>>men that the appeasers disdained. They historically >>>worked hard to derail him but there came a moment >>>of truth when they were finally unable to deny the >>>realities facing them any longer, and needed a >>>strong man to drive them towards victory. By that >>>time they were in trouble, so America was pulled >>>into the fray, with its own dictator style president >>>at the helm replaced eventually (after death) by a >>>sleeper sort of a strong man who didn't hesitate to >>>use the atomic bomb to end the Pacific war. >>> >>>How many today would have the nerve to actually use a >>>nuclear weapon? Certainly none of the appeasers here >>>want that to happen, but by their actions they're >>>driving the system towards the point where other >>>options will cease to exist. >>> >>>Unfortunately, with the sorts of "good human beings" >>>we're encountering in this newsgroup, we'll probably >>>evenually get to the point where we'll have to use >>>our own final solution to the problem by using nukes. >>> >>>History has taught us that it is a much smaller mess >>>if you take care of business and protect yourself >>>early in the game, rather than late. Keep on ignoring >>>all of history folks. I'll be investing in uranium >>>futures. >> >> >> BAH--this is a new low for you. Self-congratulation and attacking other >> posters by using another screen name. > >Follow that lemming! Exactly. It is the lemming myth coming true. I keep wondering if this isn't what happened with Tower of Babel. Then I think about the net and its global access. I've thousands of hypotheses and have thrown out most of them. /BAH |