Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 4 Nov 2006 19:37 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:454CAFB9.3433D447(a)hotmail.com... > >>>I never was able to find buttermilk in any shop or >>>"supermarket." >> >>Probably because there's little demand for it. > > > It's one of those regional cuisine things. > > > >>I've not even sure what it is ! > > > It used to be the name for the whey that is left over when you make butter. > Now it refers to milk that is cultured with some sort of bacteria > (acidophilus?) that makes it slightly acidic and slightly thicker than > regular milk. It's kind of like kefir, if you're familiar with it. > > > >>What do you use it for ? > > > It's often used to give a slightly sour taste to baked goods, and the acid > reacts with baking soda to leaven non-yeast based ("quick") breads. Boston > brown bread comes to mind, because I make a big batch of it for the holidays > ever year. It is a beverage many people like to drink.
From: lucasea on 4 Nov 2006 19:38 "Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_(a)charter.net> wrote in message news:Zg33h.1145$vj4.406(a)newsfe07.lga... > Eeyore wrote: > >> >> Spehro Pefhany wrote: >> >> >>> if you're in the market for a $5K+ >>>watch, there are only a few places worldwide that are comparable >> >> >> Why would anyone spend that much on a watch ? I can't figure it. Aside >> from >> bragging rights of course ! >> > you can't figure it out? why does that > not surprise me? Because not everybody in the world allows the cost of their possessions to define them as human beings? Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 4 Nov 2006 19:40 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:15e6a$454cbf2e$4fe7077$9345(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > krw wrote: > >> In article <GRH2h.485$Mw.139(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, >> lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... >> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:eifcgg$8qk_001(a)s820.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> >>>>Yes, Medicare and Medicaid in the US. If these two programs which >>>>are single payer don't work, why would making them be the only >>>>insurance payer in the country work? For that matter, why should >>>>we allow medical insurance payouts be a federal responsibility? That >>>>is undermining our Constitution by transferring power to the federal >>>>government rather than keeping it in each State. >>> >>>What part of "provide for the general welfare" do you not understand? >> >> >> Perhaps you want to read what the founding fathers thought it meant. >> Hint: I has nothing to do with what we call "welfare". > > Try common weal, sometimes commonweal. > > http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=commonweal Yes. And you don't think that the health of its citizens is a major part of the "common good". If it isn't, then exactly what *does* it refer to? Eric Lucas
From: JoeBloe on 4 Nov 2006 19:43 On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:39:43 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Have you already forgotten the reason for the Arab Embargo ? >> >> Yes. I don't remember all the details. > >It was because of western backing of Israel. Sound familiar ? Truth is that >Israel is the number one messmaker in the region. > You're a goddamned idiot!
From: unsettled on 4 Nov 2006 19:50
lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:454CBEC1.512631B8(a)hotmail.com... > >> >>unsettled wrote: >> >> >>>Eeyore wrote: >>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Yeah, so? That bitterness is a good summary of those peoples' >>>>>>personal >>>>>>experiences. How does that invalidate the study? >>>>> >>>>>The conclusions from the data showed the opposite. >>>> >>>> >>>>Eh ? Do explain what you mean. >>> >>>BAH explained it. You snipped the context and came back >>>with this "Eeyore is stupid, please explain it again" >>>thing you do all the time. >>> >>>The problem, simply stated, is that the way questions >>>were asked in the poll prevented the people's actual >>>feelings from being heard. >> >>How do you know this ? >> >>Divine Guidance ? > > > No, it just disagrees with his/her preconceived notions of how the world > *must* be, and therefore it *must* be wrong. > > > >>>I provided this book for you to read earlier in this >>>thread. You need to educate yourself in such matters >>>because based on your responses it is apparent you're >>>not qualified to engage in the conversations you're >>>embroiled in: >>> >>>_The Illusion of Public Opinion: Fact and Artifact in >>>American Public Opinion Polls_ by George F. Bishop >> >>I'm aware of the potential for distortion by asking 'leading questions'. >> >>Do you have any evidence this was done in this poll ? > > > Of course not. That would be actual data, which s/he refuses to discuss. > Better to broadly dismiss all polls, than admit one that belies his/her > twisted worldview. I discussed it all right, but you failed to understand simple logis, and now you deny the discussion happened. Classic trolling. |