Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MooseFET on 4 Nov 2006 12:43 Eeyore wrote: [....] > > Seriously, do you exist in some Bizzaro world of 50 years ago? It would > > explain your reluctance to use a web browser on your otherwise capable PC. > > Is there a DOS browser ? There is at least one: http://home.arachne.cz/
From: T Wake on 4 Nov 2006 12:44 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:454C9B45.980DB36A(a)hotmail.com... > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >> >>>So you choose to listen to somebody who isn't even running for office, >> >> >> >> Kerry? He's running for President. >> > >> >Funny, we're not electing a president next week. Focus. >> >> I'm not the one who has to focus. The Democrats are the ones >> who have to focus. That is what I'm saying in this thread. >> They are avoiding everything that has to do with reality. > > Such as ? Fictional threats. Imagined disasters and general under the bed bogeymen. All the real threats like them.
From: Eeyore on 4 Nov 2006 12:45 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >>> > >>> What counts with measuring the effectiveness of any social program > >>> is the individual stories, not the cut and dried percentages > >>> of service delivery counts. > >> > >>And yet you prefer to believe impersonal books when learning about what > >>Islam is all about, instead of talking to actual Muslims. > > > > What do you suggest? I'm reading about their history. > > Try doing both. I get the feeling you distance yourself from society > somewhat, which may explain the perspective you bring to the discussion. > > Try talking to, and spending time with, Moslems. They are not very different > from Christians. They're also usually quite keen to talk about their religion and how it affects their lives too. Graham
From: unsettled on 4 Nov 2006 12:45 Eeyore wrote: > > unsettled wrote: > > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >>>unsettled wrote: >>> >>>>Jamie wrote: >>>> >>>>>Eeyore wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Spehro Pefhany wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>if you're in the market for a $5K+ >>>>>>>watch, there are only a few places worldwide that are comparable >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Why would anyone spend that much on a watch ? I can't figure it. Aside >>>>> >>>>>>from bragging rights of course ! >>>>> >>>>>>Graham >>>>> >>>>>you can't figure it out? why does that >>>>>not surprise me? >>>> >>>>Easy things are difficult for our camel jockey. >>> >>> >>>So do tell why a $5k watch makes sense. >>> >>>Graham >> >>What does "make sense" have to do with jewelry? > > > Thank you for admitting it makes no sense. > > Graham > > Well that was easy! My last 2 watches cost under $7 from walmart. The 1st one lasted 5 years on the original battery till I broke the crystal (it was still running). The second is still running strong on the original battery (pushing 4 years now). But then I'm into functionality, not jewelry.
From: unsettled on 4 Nov 2006 12:46
Eeyore wrote: > > unsettled wrote: > > >>Arab = Muslim > > > Mainly. > > And Muslim does not mean Arab. > > Graham > I said that. You snipped it. Islam is a superset of Arab. |