From: jmfbahciv on
In article <1162659322.488191.228410(a)f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"MooseFET" <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>[...]
>> Sure. But preventative health care does not apply to the needs of
>> the old and the dying.
>
>It does apply to the needs of the old a great deal. Preventing a
>broken hip saves a huge amount of money. Preventing bone loss is very
>important in the elderly.

The number of preventable things that can be done diminishes as
you get older. Preventing a broken hip is also fixing the creaky
joints so that the person doesn't trip and break things. Yet
there is a waiting line for hip replacement because it is an
elective operation and not one that is needed by patient because
he/she isn't sick enough.

Fixing the joint so a person can keep his balance is mess
prevention. Fixing the bone loss is something that happens
way after the person stops walking and jarring the bones.

/BAH

From: jmfbahciv on
In article <ba83h.4304$9v5.2300(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
<lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>news:eihvvg$8ps_003(a)s792.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>>
>>>Auto insurance doesn't cover damage from low oil, just accidents, so your
>>>analogy isn't correct.
>>
>> I don't know how to explain the analogy so you would understand what
>> I'm talking about.
>
>That's because it's an inappropriate analogy.

I suggest you wake up because that's what is going in the medical
insurance politics these days.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <454C9A44.7DAD3C4(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Yeah, so? That bitterness is a good summary of those peoples' personal
>> >experiences. How does that invalidate the study?
>>
>> The conclusions from the data showed the opposite.
>
>Eh ? Do explain what you mean.

I did; I tried. The conclusions of the study were that people
didn't have financial problems after retirement. It did not
show that people had to reduce their styles of living at least
several levels because the income was not enough.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <KZa3h.5012$B31.2822(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
<lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
>news:SJqdneZANLpQVNHYnZ2dnUVZ8q-dnZ2d(a)pipex.net...
>>
>>> It isn't just one or two. It is everyone I listened to plus
>>> relatives of in-laws who needed the service.
>>
>> How many did you listen to? How many relatives? What percentage of the
>> total did this reflect? How did you ensure your sample was representative
>> and not just people with complaints?
>>
>>> The only ones
>>> who thought Canada's medical system was wonderful were those
>>> husbands who were very, very sick.
>>
>> How can you make a claim like this? Did you speak to _every_ one?
>>
>> You were the first to complain about the data sample methods and
>> conclusions in the Lancet report, yet here you seem to be more than happy
>> to weigh personal anecdote over data.
>
>Oh, but she's much better at it,

I'm not only better at it, but I'm very, very, very good doing this
kind of work.

/BAH
From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Popular restaurants here include Chinese, Indian, Italian, Spanish, Greek,
> >Turkish, Thai, Japanese, French, Moroccan etc etc ..... There's even Swedish
> >foodavailable ( at Ikea ! ) and you can find Swiss cooking !!! of all things
> at
> >the Swiss Cente in London. More 'exotic' eating out ( rather fewer restaurants
> )
> >include Russian and Hungarian.
>
> What?! No Mexican food?

I dare say you can find it but I'm not very keen on especially hot food so I
woundn't bother myself.

Also bear in mind that the food available will tend to reflect the immigrant
population and I'm not aware of many Mexicans here !

Much Spanish food is similar of course.

Graham