Kip Thorne. Objects do not fall faster than light in a black hole
in [Math]
|
Prev: "Fermat's Last Theorem" Disproved? Why not to proof it anyway!
Next: An exact simplification challenge - 101 (tan, arctan)
From: bert on 13 Aug 2010 17:32 On Aug 12, 6:54 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Aug 12, 3:05 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 12, 1:26 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 12, 8:57 am, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 11, 4:44 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 11, 2:26 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 9, 10:24 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Aug 8, 2:42 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 3:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 10:16 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 11:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Kip Thorne's excuse would mean there is no more gravity for energy > > > > > > > > > > > once inside the event horizon. Otherwise the gravity inside would > > > > > > > > > > > propel energy faster than light in the black hole. > > > > > > > > > > > > The only way to make black holes work by Kip Thorne's excuse to get > > > > > > > > > > > rid of gravity and its action on energy when inside the black hole > > > > > > > > > > > itself. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > Get it right Inside a black hole nothing can overcome the gravity > > > > > > > > > > force. (no escape velosity).That is why it can't be seen TreBert > > > > > > > > > > If there is even greater gravity inside the theory says you reach > > > > > > > > > light speed at the event horizon then gravity would propel energy > > > > > > > > > faster than light. Even reaching light speed is a violation of SR > > > > > > > > > motion laws. So black holes are disproved by violating the motion law > > > > > > > > > of Einstein. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > the matenergy gets bended at the even horizon and > > > > > > > > then chew up as it falls deeper and deeper, then, > > > > > > > > at the breaking barrier stage, everything > > > > > > > > turns into electromagnetic waves at c > > > > > > > > > r.y- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Matter falling at light speed violates the motion laws of Special > > > > > > > Relativity. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > that matter becomes light (and other not visible waves) > > > > > > that light gets swallowed by the black hole so it escapes our > > > > > > spacetime and we can't see it > > > > > > > r.y- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Where did Einstein say matter could become light because of gravity? > > > > > General Relativity does not say so. That is your excuse for science. > > > > > Oh Burt, you still need to learn a lot but you r getting better. > > > > where does he say that? > > > > > e=mc^2 > > > > That doesn't involove gravity. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > gravity can be better than all cyclotrons together > > > > converting matter into energy. > > > > > r.y- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Kip Thorne was big on "worm holes" He went where others were afraid to > > go. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Wormholes are a bunk idea. A correct interpretation of GR does not > even predict them. > > There are no gravity wells just curved space where gravity geoemetry > passes through itself in a multibody gravity system. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - GR does not fit in quaNTUM REALM wORMHOLES go with Planck time and energy,where GR breaks down. TreBert
From: BURT on 13 Aug 2010 18:48
On Aug 13, 2:32 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > On Aug 12, 6:54 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 12, 3:05 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 12, 1:26 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 12, 8:57 am, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 11, 4:44 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 11, 2:26 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Aug 9, 10:24 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Aug 8, 2:42 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 3:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 10:16 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 11:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kip Thorne's excuse would mean there is no more gravity for energy > > > > > > > > > > > > once inside the event horizon. Otherwise the gravity inside would > > > > > > > > > > > > propel energy faster than light in the black hole. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only way to make black holes work by Kip Thorne's excuse to get > > > > > > > > > > > > rid of gravity and its action on energy when inside the black hole > > > > > > > > > > > > itself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > Get it right Inside a black hole nothing can overcome the gravity > > > > > > > > > > > force. (no escape velosity).That is why it can't be seen TreBert > > > > > > > > > > > If there is even greater gravity inside the theory says you reach > > > > > > > > > > light speed at the event horizon then gravity would propel energy > > > > > > > > > > faster than light. Even reaching light speed is a violation of SR > > > > > > > > > > motion laws. So black holes are disproved by violating the motion law > > > > > > > > > > of Einstein. > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > the matenergy gets bended at the even horizon and > > > > > > > > > then chew up as it falls deeper and deeper, then, > > > > > > > > > at the breaking barrier stage, everything > > > > > > > > > turns into electromagnetic waves at c > > > > > > > > > > r.y- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Matter falling at light speed violates the motion laws of Special > > > > > > > > Relativity. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > that matter becomes light (and other not visible waves) > > > > > > > that light gets swallowed by the black hole so it escapes our > > > > > > > spacetime and we can't see it > > > > > > > > r.y- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Where did Einstein say matter could become light because of gravity? > > > > > > General Relativity does not say so. That is your excuse for science. > > > > > > Oh Burt, you still need to learn a lot but you r getting better. > > > > > where does he say that? > > > > > > e=mc^2 > > > > > That doesn't involove gravity. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > gravity can be better than all cyclotrons together > > > > > converting matter into energy. > > > > > > r.y- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Kip Thorne was big on "worm holes" He went where others were afraid to > > > go. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Wormholes are a bunk idea. A correct interpretation of GR does not > > even predict them. > > > There are no gravity wells just curved space where gravity geoemetry > > passes through itself in a multibody gravity system. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > GR does not fit in quaNTUM REALM wORMHOLES go with Planck time and > energy,where GR breaks down. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Where GR breaks down it is wrong. There are no black holes. Curved space cannot provide a bridge in distance. Mitch Raemsch |