List traffic
in [PgSql]
|
Prev: Patch for PKST timezone
Next: [HACKERS] SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs)
From: Tom Lane on 11 May 2010 10:41 Magnus Hagander <magnus(a)hagander.net> writes: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(a)hub.org> wrote: >> Not sure where the split would be, mind you ... almost thinking about patch review / discussions vs hashing out new features or something like that ... > We just *discontinued* -patches. Yeah, it's not time to reverse that decision. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Simon Riggs on 11 May 2010 10:59 On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:23 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Sure. You did a huge job of getting HS done and I will try to help > where I can, and I know you have a business to run > (http://www.2ndquadrant.com/). 2ndQuadrant is in the end the main and final reason Hot Standby exists and has now funded more than two-thirds of project costs, though the support of many others is very much appreciated. Luckily the business is successful and there are marketing and administration people to handle commercial matters now, while the team is working on open source projects and advocacy. As a privately held company it's easier to control our own destiny. Offering 24/7 support helps fund more time on open source development projects from all members of the now much expanded tech team. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: "Marc G. Fournier" on 11 May 2010 13:32 On Tue, 11 May 2010, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Marc G. Fournier's message of mar may 11 09:58:34 -0400 2010: > >> If list traffic, especially on -hackers, is getting so large, should we >> look at maybe splitting it? I could easily enough split things such that >> I duplicate the subscriber list, so nobody would have to subscribe, but it >> would make it easier for ppl to filter their incoming ... ? > > Maybe we could create a separate list where people would send patches, > and keep patchless discussion on -hackers? > > Just a thought ;-) The thing is, it seems to me, especially now that we have such strong commit fests, that we should have a seperate form for 'design phase' then for 'reivew discusions' ... *shrug* There may be some that are interested in what is being implemented, but don't really care about how it was implemented ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scrappy(a)hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy(a)hub.org -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Alvaro Herrera on 11 May 2010 13:24 Excerpts from Marc G. Fournier's message of mar may 11 09:58:34 -0400 2010: > If list traffic, especially on -hackers, is getting so large, should we > look at maybe splitting it? I could easily enough split things such that > I duplicate the subscriber list, so nobody would have to subscribe, but it > would make it easier for ppl to filter their incoming ... ? Maybe we could create a separate list where people would send patches, and keep patchless discussion on -hackers? Just a thought ;-) -- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas on 12 May 2010 12:24
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(a)hub.org> wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2010, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Excerpts from Marc G. Fournier's message of mar may 11 09:58:34 -0400 >> 2010: >> >>> If list traffic, especially on -hackers, is getting so large, should we >>> look at maybe splitting it? I could easily enough split things such that >>> I duplicate the subscriber list, so nobody would have to subscribe, but >>> it >>> would make it easier for ppl to filter their incoming ... ? >> >> Maybe we could create a separate list where people would send patches, >> and keep patchless discussion on -hackers? >> >> Just a thought ;-) > > The thing is, it seems to me, especially now that we have such strong commit > fests, that we should have a seperate form for 'design phase' then for > 'reivew discusions' ... *shrug* > > There may be some that are interested in what is being implemented, but > don't really care about how it was implemented ... The difference between discussing a patch and discussing an idea that might lead to a patch is fairly fine. Exactly how far people go with the design discussion before reducing it to code varies from person to person and project to project. I think the way to satisfy the people who want to know what but not how is through vehicles like PWN and blog postings. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |