Mass-Energy Equivalence
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Physics_For_Entertaiment
Next: PING: Steve Willner
From: spudnik on 26 Apr 2010 15:00 so, why cannot the "propagation of light" be solely through matter in space?... what is a single quality of aether, that is required for "electromagnetism?" thus: what ever it says, Shapiro's last book is just a polemic; his real "proof" is _1599_; the fans of de Vere are hopelessly stuck-up -- especially if they went to Harry Potter PS#1. http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://entertainment.timesonline.co.... --Light: A History! http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 26 Apr 2010 16:00 so, "Aether Displacement is a unified theory," deserving of capitalization?... well, what this is really about, is my net-addiction, because you would otherwise not be so God-am "productive," without the goading of my own predeliction. so, let me quote from the LaRouche site's lead-article: Max Planck began his series of lectures on thermodynamics in 1909 by asserting that science is the systematic investigation of sense perceptions. Our concepts of basic principles, like force, come from those senses. The task of science "consists only in the relating of sense perceptions, in accordance with experience, to fixed laws." Those laws were, themselves, always brought closer and closer into line with experience. But, this description was only a trap for the unsuspecting, for Planck then made an about-face, and asserted that, "ladies and gentlemen, this view has never contributed to any advance in physics." Relating the sense perceptions to one another with mathematics, and pulling logical derivations out of those relations, can be quite interesting, but this could never, in itself, derive a new discovery of principle. The generation of new knowledge about the universe comes from a world different from that of sense perception, but one which the human mind has access to. .... The concepts "material" and "energetic" are thus well defined. Material is the stuff you can sense, and energetic is why you can sense it. Energetic phenomena are generally continuous, while material phenomena are generally discrete. Who would mistake the light emitted from a light bulb, for the light bulb itself? But, are these two concepts really so well defined? http://larouchepub.com/lym/2010/3716new_periodic_table.html and, have a very nice day/life!
From: mpc755 on 26 Apr 2010 19:40 On Apr 26, 3:00 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > so, why cannot the "propagation of light" > be solely through matter in space?... > what is a single quality of aether, > that is required for "electromagnetism?" > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is uncompressed matter and matter is compressed aether, so if you want to say light propagates through uncompressed matter, that would be correct. > thus: > what ever it says, Shapiro's last book is just a polemic; > his real "proof" is _1599_; > the fans of de Vere are hopelessly stuck-up -- > especially if they went to Harry Potter PS#1.http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://entertainment.timesonline.co.... > > --Light: A History!http://wlym.com
From: mpc755 on 26 Apr 2010 19:41 On Apr 26, 4:00 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > so, "Aether Displacement is a unified theory," deserving > of capitalization? Correct.
From: BURT on 26 Apr 2010 19:43
On Apr 26, 4:41 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 26, 4:00 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > so, "Aether Displacement is a unified theory," deserving > > of capitalization? > > Correct. There is an aether element in the universe. But there are other immutable substances that exist together with it. Mitch Raemsch |