Mass-Energy Equivalence
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Physics_For_Entertaiment
Next: PING: Steve Willner
From: BURT on 27 Apr 2010 15:00 On Apr 27, 11:53 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 2:36 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 4:59 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 27, 1:17 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > > > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > > > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > > > > and here is a more-refined argument." > > > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > > > > That is why I also add in 'to date'. > > > > Stating the following: > > > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory. > > > > and: > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > > > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > > > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > > > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > > If you were let have that what would you have? > > > Mitch Raemsch > > You would have the understanding of the physics of nature. Yes. But what do you have? > > "Of course it would be a great advance if we could succeed in > comprehending the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field > together as one unified conformation. Then for the first time the > epoch of theoretical physics founded by Faraday and Maxwell would > reach a satisfactory conclusion. The contrast between ether and matter > would fade away, and ... the whole of physics would become a complete > system of thought, like geometry, kinematics, and the theory of > gravitation." - Albert Einstein- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The gravity field raises the energy of light by its rateless gamma. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 27 Apr 2010 15:08 On Apr 27, 3:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 11:53 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 27, 2:36 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 27, 4:59 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 27, 1:17 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > > > > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > > > > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > > > > > and here is a more-refined argument." > > > > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > > > > > That is why I also add in 'to date'. > > > > > Stating the following: > > > > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory. > > > > > and: > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > > > > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > > > > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > > > > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > > > If you were let have that what would you have? > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > You would have the understanding of the physics of nature. > > Yes. But what do you have? > I have Aether Displacement (AD). http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf "A possible candidate for dark energy that avoids some of the fine- tuning problems associated with the cosmological is quintessence, a very low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the known universe. In addition to its effect on the expansion of the universe, quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible interactions with matter and radiation." http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quintessence "quin·tes·sence â â/kwɪnËtÉsÉns/ Show Spelled[kwin-tes-uhns] Show IPA ânoun 1. the pure and concentrated essence of a substance. 2. the most perfect embodiment of something. 3. (in ancient and medieval philosophy) the fifth essence or element, ether, supposed to be the constituent matter of the heavenly bodies" A low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the known universe is aether as a one something. Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is the pure essence of matter. "quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible interactions with matter" Aether interacts with matter by being displaced by matter. The pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter manifests itself as gravity. The following image represents the aether's state of displacement as determined by its connections with the matter. The image would be more accurate if the grid connected to and through the Earth. This would more accurately reflect Einstein's concept of the state of the aether is determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places: http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2005/11/16/16nov_gpb_resources/vortex1_crop.jpg 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' "What is fundamentally new in the ether of the general theory of relativity as opposed to the ether of Lorentz consists in this, that the state of the former is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, which are amenable to law in the form of differential equations; whereas the state of the Lorentzian ether in the absence of electromagnetic fields is conditioned by nothing outside itself, and is everywhere the same. The ether of the general theory of relativity is transmuted conceptually into the ether of Lorentz if we substitute constants for the functions of space which describe the former, disregarding the causes which condition its state." http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html The cause which conditions its state is its displacement by matter. Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047 "There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence space effectively âflowsâ towards matter. However this is not a âflowâ of some form of âmatterâ through space, as previously considered in the aether models or in the ârandomâ particulate Le Sage kinetic theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the âflowâ in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not relative to some a priori background geometrical space" What is described as "space effectively âflowsâ towards matter" is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter. "Then the âflowâ in one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions" http://home.netcom.com/~sbyers11/ Quote from Albert A Michelson's lecture circa 1899. "Suppose that an aether strain corresponds to an electric charge, an aether displacement to the electric current, aether vortices to the atoms; if we continue these suppositions, we arrive at what may be one of the grandest generalizations of modern science, namely that all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations of the various modes of motion of one all-pervading (substance), the aether. The day seems not to distant when the converging lines from many apparently remote regions of thought will meet on some common ground. Then the nature of the atom and the forces called into play in their chemical union, the interactions between these atoms and the non-differentiated aether as manifested in the phenomena of light and electricity , the structure of the molecule, the explanation of cohesion, elasticity and gravitation, all of these will be marshaled into a single compact and consistent body of scientific knowledge." I would modify the statement to read: "all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations of the various states of one all-pervading (substance), the aether." http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html Albert Einstein: "the state of the former is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" I would modify the statement to read: The state of the aether as determined by the connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the aether's state of displacement. Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacement creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. 'Frictionless supersolid a step closer' http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the swimming pool." In the analogy the swimmer is any body and the water is the aether. Just as the swimmer displaces the water, whether the swimmer is at rest with respect to the water, or not, a body displaces the aether, whether the body is at rest with respect to the aether, or not. In the analogy the moving swimmer creates a displacement wave in the water. A moving body creates a displacement wave in the aether. 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum medium and the inertial motion of particles' http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf "Abstract: The similarity between the energy spectra of relativistic particles and that of quasi-particles in super-conductivity BCS theory makes us conjecture that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as the ground state of the background field is a super fluid medium, and the rest mass of a relativistic particle is like the energy gap of a quasi-particle. This conjecture is strongly supported by the results of our following investigation: a particle moving through the vacuum medium at a speed less than the speed of light in vacuum, though interacting with the vacuum medium, never feels friction force and thus undergoes a frictionless and inertial motion." A particle in the super fluid medium displaces the super fluid medium, whether the particle is at rest with respect to the super fluid medium, or not. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in the super fluid medium. A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in the aether. Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the object. 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case of an external field acting on the particle." "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is located." de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of the wave. In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits. A C-60 molecule displaces the aether. A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and there is no interference. The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity. Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the plates forces the plates together. 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "These are essentially based on the way in which quantities respectively characterizing the regular v wave and the internal u0 wave of the particle connect with the neighbourhood of the singular region. u0 would have to increase very sharply as one penetrates the singular region." This is similar to Einstein's concept of: 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places". There is a connectedness between the particle and the neighborhood. There is a connectedness between the matter and the aether. The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the aether's state of displacement. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. In AD, mass is conserved. The rate at which an atomic clock 'ticks' is based upon the aether pressure in which it exists. In terms of motion, the speed of a GPS satellite with respect to the aether causes it to displace more aether and for that aether to exert more pressure on the clock in the GPS satellite than the aether pressure associated with a clock at rest with respect to the Earth. This causes the GPS satellite clock to "result in a delay of about 7 ìs/day". The aether pressure associated with the aether displaced by the Earth exerts less pressure on the GPS satellite than a similar clock at rest on the Earth "causing the GPS clocks to appear faster by about 45 ìs/day". The aether pressure associated with the speed at which the GPS satellite moves with respect to the aether and the aether pressure associated with the aether displaced by the Earth causes "clocks on the GPS satellites [to] tick approximately 38 ìs/day faster than clocks on the ground." (quoted text from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_relativity_on_GPS). The state of the aether is determined by its connections with the matter which is the Earth. This means the aether is less connected to the Earth where the airplanes fly in the 'Hafele and Keating Experiment' than it is to the surface of the Earth. If you looked up from the surface of the Earth to 'see' the aether it would appear as if the aether were 'flowing' east to west compared to the surface of the Earth. The aether is still 'flowing' west to east but not at the same rate as the surface of the Earth. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/Relativ/airtim.html "Relative to the atomic time scale of the U.S. Naval Observatory, the flying clocks lost 59+/-10 nanoseconds during the eastward trip and gained 273+/-7 nanosecond during the westward trip, where the errors are the corresponding standard deviations." Flying with the Earth's rotation, eastward, is flying against the 'flow' of aether, relative to the surface of the Earth, causing a greater aether pressure on the atomic clock causing the atomic clock to tick slower. Flying against the Earth's rotation, westward, is flying with the 'flow' of aether, relative to the surface of the Earth, causing a lower aether pressure on the atomic clock causing the atomic clock to tick faster. There is a train and an embankment. "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" - Albert Einstein Relative to the train and the embankment the state of the aether is most determined by its connections with the matter which is the Earth. This means the aether is more 'localized' with respect to the embankment than it is to the train. Three Observers get together at M'. They each hold an atomic clock. They synchronize their clocks. One Observer begins to walk to B'. As the Observer walks to B' the observer, and the clock, are walking against the 'flow' of aether. This increases the aether pressure on the clock and causes the clock to tick slower. The Observer walking the clock to A' is walking with the 'flow' of aether which reduces the pressure associated with the aether on the atomic clock and the atomic clock ticks faster. When the Observers get to A' and B' their clocks are once again under the same amount of aether pressure as is the clock at M' and all three clocks tick at the same rate. Let's assume the clocks at A', M', and B' read 12:00:05, 12:00:03, and 12:00:01 respectively when they are at A', M', and B'. A flash of light occurs at A/A' and B/B'. The light arrives at M simultaneously. The flash of light occurs at B' when the clock at B' reads 12:00:01. The flash of light occurs at A' when the clock at A' reads 12:00:05. The light from B' propagates with the 'flow' of aether and takes 5 seconds to reach M'. The light from A' propagates against the 'flow' of aether and takes 9 seconds to reach M'. The light from the lightning strike at B/B' arrives at M' when the clock at M' reads 12:00:08. The light from the lightning strike at A/A' arrives at M' when the clock at M' reads 12:00:12. The three Observers get back together to discuss the experiment. The Observer at B' says the flash at B' occurred at 12:00:01. The Observer at A' says the flash of light at A' occurred at 12:00:05. The Observer at M' says the flash from B' arrived at 12:00:08 and the flash from A' arrived at 12:00:12. The Observers conclude the lightning strikes were not simultaneous and the light propagated at 'c' from B' to M' and propagated at 'c' from A' to M' and both sets of light waves took 7 seconds to arrive at M'. If the Observers on the train knew their state with respect to the state of the aether then the Observers would have been able to determine the rate at which their clocks ticked as they were walked to A' and B' and they would have been able to conclude the lightning strikes occurred simultaneously, in nature. Light propagates at 'c' with respect to the aether. The following is an explanation of what occurs in nature in a 'delayed choice quantum eraser' experiment. Following the explanation are two experiments which will provide evidence of Aether Displacement. In the image on the right here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experiment When the downgraded photon pair are created, in order for there to be conservation of momentum, the original photons momentum is maintained. This means the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums. We will describe one of the photons as being the 'up' photon and the other photon as being the 'down' photon. One of the downgraded photons travels either the red or blue path towards D0 and the other photon travels either the red or blue path towards the prism. There are physical waves in the aether propagating both the red and blue paths. The aether waves propagating towards D0 interact with the lens and create interference prior to reaching D0. The aether waves create interference which alters the direction the photon travels prior to reaching D0. There are actually two interference patterns being created at D0. One associated with the 'up' photons when they arrive at D0 and the other interference pattern associated with the 'down' photons when they arrive at D0. Both 'up' and 'down' photons are reflected by BSa and arrive at D3. Since there is a single path towards D3 there is nothing for the wave in the aether to interfere with and there is no interference pattern and since it is not determined if it is an 'up' or 'down' photon being detected at D3 there is no way to distinguish between the photons arriving at D0 which interference pattern each photon belongs to. The same for photons reflected by BSb and arrive at D4. Photons which pass through BSa and are reflected by BSc and arrive at D1 are either 'up' or 'down' photons but not both. If 'up' photons arrive at D1 then 'down' photons arrive at D2. The opposite occurs for photons which pass through BSb. Photons which pass through BSa and pass through BSb and arrive at D1 are all either 'up' or 'down' photons. If all 'up' photons arrive at D1 then all 'down' photons arrive at D2. Since the physical waves in the aether traveling both the red and blue paths are combined prior to D1 and D2 the aether waves create interference which alters the direction the photon travels. Since all 'up' photons arrive at one of the detectors and all 'down' photons arrive at the other an interference pattern is created which reflects back to the interference both sets of photons are creating at D0. Figures 3 and 4 here: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9903/9903047v1.pdf Show the interference pattern of the 'up' and 'down' photons. If you were to combine the two images and add the peaks together and add the valleys together you would have the interference pattern of the original photon. This is evidence the downgraded photon pair maintain the original photons momentum and have opposite angular momentums. Nothing is erased. There is no delayed choice. Physical waves in the aether are traveling both the red and blue paths and when the paths are combined the waves create interference which alters the direction the photon 'particle' travels. Experiments which will provide evidence of Aether Displacement: Experiment #1: Instead of having a single beam splitter BSc have two beam splitters BSca and BScb. Have the photons reflected by mirror Ma interact with BSca and have the photons reflected by mirror Mb interact with BScb. Do not combine the red and blue paths. Have additional detectors D1a, D2a, D1b, and D2b. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through BSca be detected at D1a and D2a. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through BScb be detected at D1b and D2b. If you compare the photons detected at D1a and D1b with the photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference pattern. If you compare the photons detected at D2a and D2b with the photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference pattern. What is occurring is all 'up' photons are being detected at one pair of detectors, for example D1a and D1b, and all 'down' photons are being detected at the other pair of detectors, for example D2a and D2b. Interference patterns do not even need to be created in order to 'go back' and determine the interference patterns created at D0. Experiment #2: Alter the experiment. When the downgraded photon pair are created, have each photon interact with its own double slit apparatus. Have detectors at one of the exits for each double slit apparatus. When a photon is detected at one of the exits, in AD, the photon's aether wave still exists and is propagating along the path exiting the other slit. When a photon is not detected at one of the exits, the photon 'particle' along with its associated aether wave exits the other slit. Combine the path the aether wave the detected photon is propagating along with the path of the other photon and its associated aether wave. An interference pattern will still be created. This shows the aether wave of a detected photon still exists and is able to create interference with the aether wave of another photon, altering the direction the photon 'particle' travels.
From: BURT on 27 Apr 2010 15:15 On Apr 27, 12:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 3:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 11:53 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 27, 2:36 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 27, 4:59 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 27, 1:17 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > > > > > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > > > > > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > > > > > > and here is a more-refined argument." > > > > > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > > > > > > That is why I also add in 'to date'. > > > > > > Stating the following: > > > > > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory. > > > > > > and: > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > > > > > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > > > > > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > > > > If you were let have that what would you have? > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > You would have the understanding of the physics of nature. > > > Yes. But what do you have? > > I have Aether Displacement (AD). > > http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf > > "A possible candidate for dark energy that avoids some of the fine- > tuning problems associated with the cosmological is quintessence, a > very low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the > known universe. In addition to its effect on the expansion of the > universe, quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible > interactions with matter and radiation." > > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quintessence > > "quin·tes·sence > â â/kwɪnËtÉsÉns/ Show Spelled[kwin-tes-uhns] Show IPA > ânoun > 1. the pure and concentrated essence of a substance. > 2. the most perfect embodiment of something. > 3. (in ancient and medieval philosophy) the fifth essence or element, > ether, supposed to be the constituent matter of the heavenly bodies" > > A low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the > known universe is aether as a one something. > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > > Aether is the pure essence of matter. > > "quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible > interactions with matter" > > Aether interacts with matter by being displaced by matter. > > The pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter manifests itself as > gravity. > > The following image represents the aether's state of displacement as > determined by its connections with the matter. The image would be more > accurate if the grid connected to and through the Earth. This would > more accurately reflect Einstein's concept of the state of the aether > is determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the > aether in neighboring places: > > http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2005/11/16/16nov_gpb_resou... > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity > by > Albert Einstein' > > "What is fundamentally new in the ether of the general theory of > relativity as opposed to the ether of Lorentz consists in this, that > the state of the former is at every place determined by connections > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, > which are amenable to law in the form of differential equations; > whereas the state of the Lorentzian ether in the absence of > electromagnetic fields is conditioned by nothing outside itself, and > is everywhere the same. The ether of the general theory of relativity > is transmuted conceptually into the ether of Lorentz if we substitute > constants for the functions of space which describe the former, > disregarding the causes which condition its state."http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > The cause which conditions its state is its displacement by matter. > > Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constanthttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047 > > "There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity > for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter > level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam > system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that > gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the > informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence > space effectively âflowsâ towards matter. However this is not a âflowâ > of some form of âmatterâ through space, as previously considered in > the aether models or in the ârandomâ particulate Le Sage kinetic > theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the > quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a > geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the âflowâ in > one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not > relative to some a priori background geometrical space" > > What is described as "space effectively âflowsâ towards matter" is the > pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter. > > "Then the âflowâ in one region is relative only to the patterns in > nearby regions" > > http://home.netcom.com/~sbyers11/ > > Quote from Albert A Michelson's lecture circa 1899. > > "Suppose that an aether strain corresponds to an electric charge, an > aether displacement to the electric current, aether vortices to the > atoms; if we continue these suppositions, we arrive at what may be one > of the grandest generalizations of modern science, namely that all the > phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations > of the various modes of motion of one all-pervading (substance), the > aether. The day seems not to distant when the converging lines from > many apparently remote regions of thought will meet on some common > ground. Then the nature of the atom and the forces called into play in > their chemical union, the interactions between these atoms and the > non-differentiated aether as manifested in the phenomena of light and > electricity , the structure of the molecule, the explanation of > cohesion, elasticity and gravitation, all of these will be marshaled > into a single compact and consistent body of scientific knowledge." > > I would modify the statement to read: > > "all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different > manifestations of the various states of one all-pervading (substance), > the aether." > > http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html > > Albert Einstein: > > "the state of the former is at every place determined by connections > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" > > I would modify the statement to read: > > The state of the aether as determined by the connections with the > matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the > aether's state of displacement. > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > Aether is displaced by matter. > Displacement creates pressure. > Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. > > 'Frictionless supersolid a step closer'http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html > > "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without > friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such > particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer > who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the > swimming pool." > > In the analogy the swimmer is any body and the water is the aether. > Just as the swimmer displaces the water, whether the swimmer is at > rest with respect to the water, or not, a body displaces the aether, > whether the body is at rest with respect to the aether, or not. > > In the analogy the moving swimmer creates a displacement wave in the > water. A moving body creates a displacement wave in the aether. > > 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum > medium and the inertial motion of particles'http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf > > "Abstract: The similarity between the energy spectra of relativistic > particles and that of quasi-particles in super-conductivity BCS theory > makes us conjecture that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as > the ground state of the background field is a super fluid medium, and > the rest mass of a relativistic particle is like the energy gap of a > quasi-particle. This conjecture is strongly supported by the results > of our following investigation: a particle moving through the vacuum > medium at a speed less than the speed of light in vacuum, though > interacting with the vacuum medium, never feels friction force and > thus undergoes a frictionless and inertial motion." > > A particle in the super fluid medium displaces the super fluid medium, > whether the particle is at rest with respect to the super fluid > medium, or not. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in the > super fluid medium. > > A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is > at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an > individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in > the aether. > > Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity > as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what > is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every > nucleus which is the matter which is the object. > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > by the double solution theory > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > of an external field acting on the particle." > > "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present > theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave > where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite > natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always > be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is > located." > > de Broglie's definition of ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - How does aether displacement effect the energy of light? Mitch Raemsch
From: hanson on 27 Apr 2010 15:15 Aether John "mpc755" <mpc755(a)gmail.com> wrote: "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > Aether John "mpc755" <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > and here is a more-refined argument." > > Aether John "mpc755" > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following: > Aether Displacement is a unified theory and: > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > hanson wrote: > ... Aether John, > Aether John cranked himself & wrote: Wrong name. > hanson wrote: .... ahahahahaha... well, so I will label you as "mpc755", the "Aether Pimp" or "Aether Peddler". > > hanson wrote: > you may be quite right, as long as > you define what "is" is... It worked for Bill Clinton. > Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahanson > Aether Pimp n' Peddler wrote: That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > hanson wrote: .... ahahahahaha... No good. You did not define what "is" is. All you did was to Pimp n' Peddle your unified tripe about Aether Displacement... ahahahaha... > Aether Pimp n' Peddler wrote: [Snipped the repetition of your Aether Pimping n' Peddling] > hanson wrote: Thanks for the laughs, you splendid Aether pimp... ahahaha ahahahaha...ahahahahahanson
From: hanson on 27 Apr 2010 15:15
Aether John "mpc755" <mpc755(a)gmail.com> wrote: >"hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > Aether John "mpc755" <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > and here is a more-refined argument." > > Aether John "mpc755" wrote: > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following: > Aether Displacement is a unified theory and: > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > hanson wrote: > ... Aether John, you may be quite right, as long as > you define what "is" is... It worked for Bill Clinton. > Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahanson > Aether John "mpc755" cranked himself wrote: Wrong name douchebag. That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following: Aether Displacement is a unified theory ...and: Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > hanson wrote: .... ahahahaha.. It is not clear why "douchebag" is the "wrong name" for your "Aether Displacement theory" But you are wholly correct to say that your Aether Displacement" has influenced your own Weltbild: Thanks for the laughs, Aether John... ahahahanson |