Mass-Energy Equivalence
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Physics_For_Entertaiment
Next: PING: Steve Willner
From: mpc755 on 27 Apr 2010 12:59 On Apr 27, 12:54 pm, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > Aether John "mpc755" <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > and here is a more-refined argument." > > Aether John "mpc755" > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following: > Aether Displacement is a unified theory and: > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > hanson wrote: > > ... Aether John, you may be quite right, as long as > you define what "is" is... It worked for Bill Clinton. > Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahanson Wrong name douchebag. That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following: Aether Displacement is a unified theory. and: Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: Aether Displacement is the unified theory.
From: mpc755 on 27 Apr 2010 13:26 On Apr 27, 12:54 pm, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > Aether John "mpc755" <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > and here is a more-refined argument." > > Aether John "mpc755" > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following: > Aether Displacement is a unified theory and: > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > hanson wrote: > > ... Aether John, Wrong name. > you may be quite right, as long as > you define what "is" is... It worked for Bill Clinton. > Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahanson That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following: Aether Displacement is a unified theory. and: Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: Aether Displacement is the unified theory.
From: BURT on 27 Apr 2010 14:36 On Apr 27, 4:59 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 1:17 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > > and here is a more-refined argument." > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > > That is why I also add in 'to date'. > > Stating the following: > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory. > > and: > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. If you were let have that what would you have? Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 27 Apr 2010 14:49 On Apr 27, 2:36 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 4:59 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 27, 1:17 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > > > and here is a more-refined argument." > > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > > > That is why I also add in 'to date'. > > > Stating the following: > > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory. > > > and: > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > If you were let have that what would you have? > > Mitch Raemsch You would have THE understanding of the physics of nature. "Of course it would be a great advance if we could succeed in comprehending the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field together as one unified conformation. Then for the first time the epoch of theoretical physics founded by Faraday and Maxwell would reach a satisfactory conclusion. The contrast between ether and matter would fade away, and ... the whole of physics would become a complete system of thought, like geometry, kinematics, and the theory of gravitation." - Albert Einstein
From: mpc755 on 27 Apr 2010 14:53
On Apr 27, 2:36 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 4:59 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 27, 1:17 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because > > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is, > > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory, > > > and here is a more-refined argument." > > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory. > > > That is why I also add in 'to date'. > > > Stating the following: > > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory. > > > and: > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. > > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory. > > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say: > > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory. > > If you were let have that what would you have? > > Mitch Raemsch You would have the understanding of the physics of nature. "Of course it would be a great advance if we could succeed in comprehending the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field together as one unified conformation. Then for the first time the epoch of theoretical physics founded by Faraday and Maxwell would reach a satisfactory conclusion. The contrast between ether and matter would fade away, and ... the whole of physics would become a complete system of thought, like geometry, kinematics, and the theory of gravitation." - Albert Einstein |