Prev: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 6th Edition Incropera, DeWitt Solutions Manual
Next: From the book: "How to Succeed in College Mathematics - A Guide for the College Mathematics Student", Richard M. Dahlke, Ph.D., 2008.
From: mpc755 on 6 May 2010 01:50
On May 6, 1:15 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> in other words,
> just substitute the word "aether"
> for the word "energy" in any dyscussiom
> of "physics" -- thanks, Nuevo Einstein!
>
> thus, was maether born (and,
> presumably, antimaether).
>

Aether and energy are not the same thing. Aether is a state of mæther.
Aether has mass. In terms of E=mc^2, the physical effects of mæther
decompressing (i.e. matter converting to aether) is energy. Mæther
decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

"The basic concept behind any fusion reaction is to bring two or more
atoms close enough together so that the residual strong force (nuclear
force) in their nuclei will pull them together into one larger atom.
If two light nuclei fuse, they will generally form a single nucleus
with a slightly smaller mass than the sum of their original masses.
The difference in mass is released as energy according to Albert
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc^2."

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
I named this material mæther.
Aether is decompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther.

The released mass is decompressed mæther. The released mass is aether.

The physical effects of mæther decompressing is energy.

Mass is conserved.
From: mpc755 on 6 May 2010 02:04
On May 6, 1:15 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> in other words,
> just substitute the word "aether"
> for the word "energy" in any dyscussiom
> of "physics" -- thanks, Nuevo Einstein!
>
> thus, was maether born (and,
> presumably, antimaether).
>

Aether and energy are not the same. Aether is a state of mæther.
Aether has mass. In terms of E=mc^2, the physical effects of mæther
decompressing (i.e. matter converting to aether) is energy.

Mæther decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

"The basic concept behind any fusion reaction is to bring two or more
atoms close enough together so that the residual strong force (nuclear
force) in their nuclei will pull them together into one larger atom.
If two light nuclei fuse, they will generally form a single nucleus
with a slightly smaller mass than the sum of their original masses.
The difference in mass is released as energy according to Albert
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc^2."

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
I named this material mæther.
Aether is decompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther.

The released mass is decompressed mæther. The released mass is aether.

The physical effects of mæther decompressing is energy.

Mass is conserved.
From: mpc755 on 6 May 2010 03:23
On May 6, 1:15 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> in other words,
> just substitute the word "aether"
> for the word "energy" in any dyscussiom
> of "physics" -- thanks, Nuevo Einstein!
>
> thus, was maether born (and,
> presumably, antimaether).
>

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
I named this material mæther.
Aether is decompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther.

Aether and energy are not the same. Aether is a state of mæther.
Aether has mass. In terms of E=mc^2, the physical effects of mæther
decompressing (i.e. matter converting to aether) is energy.

Mæther decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

"The basic concept behind any fusion reaction is to bring two or more
atoms close enough together so that the residual strong force (nuclear
force) in their nuclei will pull them together into one larger atom.
If two light nuclei fuse, they will generally form a single nucleus
with a slightly smaller mass than the sum of their original masses.
The difference in mass is released as energy according to Albert
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc^2."

The released mass is decompressed mæther. The released mass is aether.

Mass is conserved.
From: mpc755 on 6 May 2010 11:46
On May 6, 1:15 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> in other words,
> just substitute the word "aether"
> for the word "energy" in any dyscussiom
> of "physics" -- thanks, Nuevo Einstein!
>
> thus, was maether born (and,
> presumably, antimaether).
>

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
I named this material mæther.
Aether is decompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther.

Anti-matter or anti-mæther are inadequate concepts. Think of an
electron and positron as both consisting of mæther but being exact
opposites (i.e. mirror images) of one another.

When the electron and positron 'annihilate' one another the mæther
which is both the electron and the positron converts to aether. The
physical effects caused by the conversion is energy. The mass
associated with both the electron and positron still exists, as
aether.

A more correct term would be opposite-matter or opposite-mæther, since
a particle and its opposite both consist of mæther.

Aether and energy are not the same. Aether is a state of mæther.
Aether has mass. In terms of E=mc^2, the physical effects of mæther
decompressing (i.e. matter converting to aether) is energy.

Mæther decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

"The basic concept behind any fusion reaction is to bring two or more
atoms close enough together so that the residual strong force (nuclear
force) in their nuclei will pull them together into one larger atom.
If two light nuclei fuse, they will generally form a single nucleus
with a slightly smaller mass than the sum of their original masses.
The difference in mass is released as energy according to Albert
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc^2."

The released mass is decompressed mæther. The released mass is aether.

Mass is conserved.
From: PD on 6 May 2010 11:53
On May 6, 10:46 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
> A more correct term would be opposite-matter or opposite-mæther, since
> a particle and its opposite both consist of mæther.
>

Progress! The creation of two new terms!
The fact that they are new means that they are more correct!
Yay!
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
Prev: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 6th Edition Incropera, DeWitt Solutions Manual
Next: From the book: "How to Succeed in College Mathematics - A Guide for the College Mathematics Student", Richard M. Dahlke, Ph.D., 2008.