Prev: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 6th Edition Incropera, DeWitt Solutions Manual
Next: From the book: "How to Succeed in College Mathematics - A Guide for the College Mathematics Student", Richard M. Dahlke, Ph.D., 2008.
From: mpc755 on 6 May 2010 12:01
On May 6, 1:15 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> in other words,
> just substitute the word "aether"
> for the word "energy" in any dyscussiom
> of "physics" -- thanks, Nuevo Einstein!

> thus, was maether born (and,
> presumably, antimaether).

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
I named this material mæther.
Aether is decompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther.

Anti-matter or anti-mæther are inadequate concepts. Think of an
electron and positron as both consisting of mæther but being exact
opposites (i.e. mirror images) of one another.

When the electron and positron 'annihilate' one another the mæther
which is both the electron and the positron converts to aether. The
physical effects caused by the conversion is energy. The mass
associated with both the electron and positron still exists, as
aether.

A more correct term would be opposite-matter or opposite-mæther, since
a particle and its opposite both consist of mæther.

Aether and energy are not the same. Aether is a state of mæther.
Aether has mass. In terms of E=mc^2, the physical effects of mæther
decompressing (i.e. matter converting to aether) is energy.

Mæther decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect.

In terms of substitutions, the following is conceptually correct:

A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

"The basic concept behind any fusion reaction is to bring two or more
atoms close enough together so that the residual strong force (nuclear
force) in their nuclei will pull them together into one larger atom.
If two light nuclei fuse, they will generally form a single nucleus
with a slightly smaller mass than the sum of their original masses.
The difference in mass is released as energy according to Albert
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc^2."

The released mass is decompressed mæther. The released mass is aether.

Mass is conserved.
From: mpc755 on 6 May 2010 12:04
On May 6, 1:15 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> in other words,
> just substitute the word "aether"
> for the word "energy" in any dyscussiom
> of "physics" -- thanks, Nuevo Einstein!
> thus, was maether born (and,
> presumably, antimaether).

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
I named this material mæther.
Aether is decompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther.

Anti-matter or anti-mæther are inadequate concepts. Think of an
electron and positron as both consisting of mæther but being exact
opposites (i.e. mirror images) of one another.

When the electron and positron 'annihilate' one another the mæther
which is both the electron and the positron converts to aether. The
physical effects caused by the conversion is energy. The mass
associated with both the electron and positron still exists, as
aether.

A more correct term would be opposite-matter or opposite-mæther, since
a particle and its opposite both consist of mæther.

Aether and energy are not the same. Aether is a state of mæther.
Aether has mass. In terms of E=mc^2, the physical effects of mæther
decompressing (i.e. matter converting to aether) is energy.

Mæther decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect.

In terms of substitutions, the following is conceptually correct:

A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

"The basic concept behind any fusion reaction is to bring two or more
atoms close enough together so that the residual strong force (nuclear
force) in their nuclei will pull them together into one larger atom.
If two light nuclei fuse, they will generally form a single nucleus
with a slightly smaller mass than the sum of their original masses.
The difference in mass is released as energy according to Albert
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc^2."

The released mass is decompressed mæther. The released mass is aether.

Mass is conserved.
From: spudnik on 6 May 2010 14:52
hey, you used Einstein's original formulation,
A=mcc; cool, and that really explains every thing.

thank you for your gold-plated theory,
aether is maether times teh second power of the speed of light!

thus:
um, why do some folks seem to assume that
oil companies do not support capNtrade,
the Kyoto Protocol (capNtrade) or
Waxman's '91 bill on NOx and SO2 (capNtrade) --
why would that be?

thus:
anyway, the real problem is yours, of "reifying the math,"
just because you can write some formulary that happens
to include a "mass" in it (does YP think,
MKS stands for "mass-kosher-system?"), and therefore
the funky Newtonic corpuscle can be said a)
to exist and b)
to "have momentum," the *sine qua non* of has-to-
be-not-no-mass, because "then, the momentum'd be nothing viz the God-
am formula."

that is to say, the Nobel-winning, Newton-saving photoelectrical
effect
is nothing, but an instrumental datum (not a particle, as proven
by Young et al in the interim between "classical" and "Copenhagenskool
yardcat"
-- sheesh).

"there are no photons" and
"death to the lightcone -- long-live the lightcone-heads!"

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.TAKEtheGOOGOLout.com

--Stop Waxman's #2 capNtrade rip-off (unless,
you like gasoline at a dime per drop)
From: mpc755 on 6 May 2010 18:07
On May 6, 2:52 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> hey, you used Einstein's original formulation,
> A=mcc; cool, and that really explains every thing.
>
> thank you for your gold-plated theory,
> aether is maether times teh second power of the speed of light!
>

Aether is equivalent to matter. Both aether and matter are different
states of mæther.

> thus:
> um, why do some folks seem to assume that
> oil companies do not support capNtrade,
> the Kyoto Protocol (capNtrade) or
> Waxman's '91 bill on NOx and SO2 (capNtrade) --
> why would that be?
>
> thus:
> anyway, the real problem is yours, of "reifying the math,"
> just because you can write some formulary that happens
> to include a "mass" in it (does YP think,
> MKS stands for "mass-kosher-system?"), and therefore
> the funky Newtonic corpuscle can be said a)
> to exist and b)
> to "have momentum," the *sine qua non* of has-to-
> be-not-no-mass, because "then, the momentum'd be nothing viz the God-
> am formula."
>
> that is to say, the Nobel-winning, Newton-saving photoelectrical
> effect
> is nothing, but an instrumental datum (not a particle, as proven
> by Young et al in the interim between "classical" and "Copenhagenskool
> yardcat"
> -- sheesh).
>
> "there are no photons" and
> "death to the lightcone -- long-live the lightcone-heads!"
>
> --Light: A History!http://wlym.TAKEtheGOOGOLout.com
>
> --Stop Waxman's #2 capNtrade rip-off (unless,
> you like gasoline at a dime per drop)

From: mpc755 on 7 May 2010 01:11
On May 6, 2:52 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> hey, you used Einstein's original formulation,
> A=mcc; cool, and that really explains every thing.
>
> thank you for your gold-plated theory,
> aether is maether times teh second power of the speed of light!
>

Aether is equivalent to matter. Both aether and matter are different
states of mæther.

Conceptually, at least, aether is matter times the second power of the
speed of light.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
Prev: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 6th Edition Incropera, DeWitt Solutions Manual
Next: From the book: "How to Succeed in College Mathematics - A Guide for the College Mathematics Student", Richard M. Dahlke, Ph.D., 2008.