From: mpc755 on
Aether is detected every time a double slit experiment is executed.
Aether is detected in the Casimir Effect.

A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
the aether.

Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
nucleus which is the matter which is the object.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
by the double solution theory
Louis de BROGLIE'
http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
of an external field acting on the particle."

"This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
located."

de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
the wave.

In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.

A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.

A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
there is no interference.

The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity.

Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate
displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past
the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the
plates forces the plates together.

While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed at the
exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule is detected exiting a single
slit. While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed and
removed from the exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule creates an
interference pattern.

Explain how this is possible.

There is something incorrect with your 'understanding' of nature if
you can not answer such a simple question. Not being able to answer
such a simple question is evidence you do not understand the physics
of nature.

In Aether Displacement, the C-60 molecule has an associated aether
displacement wave and the C-60 molecule ALWAYS enters and exits a
single slit in a double slit experiment. It is the displacement wave
in the aether which enters and exits multiples slits. The displacement
wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the
direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detectors at the exits to the
slits causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the
wave into chop) and there is no interference.
From: Bill Hobba on
On 4/05/2010 5:54 AM, PD wrote:
> On May 3, 10:14 am, Ralph Garbage<ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 3, 6:30 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 2, 9:22 pm, mpc755<mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On May 2, 2:39 am, mpc755<mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 1, 6:43 pm, Bill Hobba<bho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On 28/04/2010 9:49 PM, mpc755 wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
>>>>>>> matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
>>>>>>> aether's state of displacement.
>>
>>>>>> And the state of the aether as determined by out inability to detect it
>>>>>> is its state of actuality - ie non existent.
>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Bill
>>
>>>>> Aether is detected every time a double slit experiment is executed.
>>>>> Aether is detected in the Casimir Effect.
>>
>>>>> A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
>>>>> at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
>>>>> individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
>>>>> the aether.
>>
>>>>> Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
>>>>> as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
>>>>> is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
>>>>> nucleus which is the matter which is the object.
>>
>>>>> 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
>>>>> by the double solution theory
>>>>> Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
>>
>>>>> "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
>>>>> wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
>>>>> of an external field acting on the particle."
>>
>>>>> "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
>>>>> theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
>>>>> where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
>>>>> natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
>>>>> be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
>>>>> located."
>>
>>>>> de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
>>>>> and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
>>>>> the wave.
>>
>>>>> In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
>>>>> the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
>>>>> exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.
>>
>>>>> A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.
>>
>>>>> A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
>>>>> C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
>>>>> C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
>>>>> experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
>>>>> the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
>>>>> it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
>>>>> travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
>>>>> associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
>>>>> there is no interference.
>>
>>>>> The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity.
>>
>>>>> Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate
>>>>> displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past
>>>>> the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the
>>>>> plates forces the plates together.
>>
>>>>> While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed at the
>>>>> exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule is detected exiting a single
>>>>> slit. While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed and
>>>>> removed from the exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule creates an
>>>>> interference pattern.
>>
>>>>> Explain how this is possible.
>>
>>>>> In Aether Displacement, the C-60 molecule has an associated aether
>>>>> displacement wave and the C-60 molecule ALWAYS enters and exits a
>>>>> single slit in a double slit experiment. It is the displacement wave
>>>>> in the aether which enters and exits multiples slits. The displacement
>>>>> wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the
>>>>> direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detectors at the exits to the
>>>>> slits causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the
>>>>> wave into chop) and there is no interference.
>>
>>>>> Should I post the '<crickets>' response to your non-response now, or
>>>>> should I wait 24 hours?
>>
>>>> <crickets>
>>
>>>> No one has been able to answer the question except for the one person
>>>> who insists the future determines the past. There is something
>>>> incorrect with your 'understanding' of nature if you can not answer
>>>> such a simple question. Not being able to answer the question is
>>>> evidence you do not understand the physics of nature.
>>
>>> This is the "dare you to convince me" model of usenet interaction. As
>>> in, "convince me you're right, or you're wrong." Of course, there's no
>>> point in trying to convince a babbling psychopath or a stick of butter
>>> or a rusty horseshoe. There are better ways to spend one's time than
>>> to work hard to respond to things like this.
>>
>> I completely agree
>>
>> with MPC!
>
> You certainly have the option of engaging with him. I've learned his
> personality quirks and have found it to be a complete waste of time to
> engage with him seriously. He's too funny to ignore completely, but
> not so funny that he deserves more attention, especially since that's
> what he craves.

Too true.

Thanks
Bill
From: mpc755 on
On May 4, 2:32 am, Bill Hobba <bho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 4/05/2010 5:54 AM, PD wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 3, 10:14 am, Ralph Garbage<ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> On May 3, 6:30 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>> On May 2, 9:22 pm, mpc755<mpc...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>> On May 2, 2:39 am, mpc755<mpc...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>>> On May 1, 6:43 pm, Bill Hobba<bho...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On 28/04/2010 9:49 PM, mpc755 wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
> >>>>>>> matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> >>>>>>> aether's state of displacement.
>
> >>>>>> And the state of the aether as determined by out inability to detect it
> >>>>>> is its state of actuality - ie non existent.
>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>> Bill
>
> >>>>> Aether is detected every time a double slit experiment is executed.
> >>>>> Aether is detected in the Casimir Effect.
>
> >>>>> A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
> >>>>> at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
> >>>>> individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
> >>>>> the aether.
>
> >>>>> Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
> >>>>> as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
> >>>>> is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
> >>>>> nucleus which is the matter which is the object.
>
> >>>>> 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> >>>>> by the double solution theory
> >>>>> Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
>
> >>>>> "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
> >>>>> wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
> >>>>> of an external field acting on the particle."
>
> >>>>> "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
> >>>>> theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
> >>>>> where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
> >>>>> natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
> >>>>> be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
> >>>>> located."
>
> >>>>> de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
> >>>>> and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
> >>>>> the wave.
>
> >>>>> In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
> >>>>> the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
> >>>>> exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.
>
> >>>>> A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.
>
> >>>>> A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> >>>>> C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
> >>>>> C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
> >>>>> experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
> >>>>> the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
> >>>>> it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
> >>>>> travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
> >>>>> associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
> >>>>> there is no interference.
>
> >>>>> The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity.
>
> >>>>> Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate
> >>>>> displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past
> >>>>> the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the
> >>>>> plates forces the plates together.
>
> >>>>> While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed at the
> >>>>> exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule is detected exiting a single
> >>>>> slit. While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed and
> >>>>> removed from the exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule creates an
> >>>>> interference pattern.
>
> >>>>> Explain how this is possible.
>
> >>>>> In Aether Displacement, the C-60 molecule has an associated aether
> >>>>> displacement wave and the C-60 molecule ALWAYS enters and exits a
> >>>>> single slit in a double slit experiment. It is the displacement wave
> >>>>> in the aether which enters and exits multiples slits. The displacement
> >>>>> wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the
> >>>>> direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detectors at the exits to the
> >>>>> slits causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the
> >>>>> wave into chop) and there is no interference.
>
> >>>>> Should I post the '<crickets>' response to your non-response now, or
> >>>>> should I wait 24 hours?
>
> >>>> <crickets>
>
> >>>> No one has been able to answer the question except for the one person
> >>>> who insists the future determines the past. There is something
> >>>> incorrect with your 'understanding' of nature if you can not answer
> >>>> such a simple question. Not being able to answer the question is
> >>>> evidence you do not understand the physics of nature.
>
> >>> This is the "dare you to convince me" model of usenet interaction. As
> >>> in, "convince me you're right, or you're wrong." Of course, there's no
> >>> point in trying to convince a babbling psychopath or a stick of butter
> >>> or a rusty horseshoe. There are better ways to spend one's time than
> >>> to work hard to respond to things like this.
>
> >> I completely agree
>
> >> with MPC!
>
> > You certainly have the option of engaging with him. I've learned his
> > personality quirks and have found it to be a complete waste of time to
> > engage with him seriously. He's too funny to ignore completely, but
> > not so funny that he deserves more attention, especially since that's
> > what he craves.
>
> Too true.
>
> Thanks
> Bill

The poster is not engaging with me, the poster is agreeing with me.
The poster agrees a moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether
displacement wave.

Obviously you can not answer the following. You are obviously one more
of many who choose to exist in a state of delusional denial rather
than understand the physics of nature.

While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed at the
exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule is detected exiting a single
slit. While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed and
removed from the exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule creates an
interference pattern.

Explain how this is possible.

In Aether Displacement, the C-60 molecule has an associated aether
displacement wave and the C-60 molecule ALWAYS enters and exits a
single slit in a double slit experiment. It is the displacement wave
in the aether which enters and exits multiples slits. The displacement
wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the
direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detectors at the exits to the
slits causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the
wave into chop) and there is no interference.
From: Ralph Garbage on
On May 3, 10:39 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 4, 2:32 am, Bill Hobba <bho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 4/05/2010 5:54 AM, PD wrote:
>
> > > On May 3, 10:14 am, Ralph Garbage<ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
> > >> On May 3, 6:30 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > >>> On May 2, 9:22 pm, mpc755<mpc...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > >>>> On May 2, 2:39 am, mpc755<mpc...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > >>>>> On May 1, 6:43 pm, Bill Hobba<bho...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> On 28/04/2010 9:49 PM, mpc755 wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>> The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
> > >>>>>>> matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> > >>>>>>> aether's state of displacement.
>
> > >>>>>> And the state of the aether as determined by out inability to detect it
> > >>>>>> is its state of actuality - ie non existent.
>
> > >>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>> Bill
>
> > >>>>> Aether is detected every time a double slit experiment is executed.
> > >>>>> Aether is detected in the Casimir Effect.
>
> > >>>>> A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
> > >>>>> at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
> > >>>>> individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
> > >>>>> the aether.
>
> > >>>>> Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
> > >>>>> as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
> > >>>>> is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
> > >>>>> nucleus which is the matter which is the object.
>
> > >>>>> 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> > >>>>> by the double solution theory
> > >>>>> Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
>
> > >>>>> "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
> > >>>>> wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
> > >>>>> of an external field acting on the particle."
>
> > >>>>> "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
> > >>>>> theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
> > >>>>> where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
> > >>>>> natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
> > >>>>> be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
> > >>>>> located."
>
> > >>>>> de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
> > >>>>> and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
> > >>>>> the wave.
>
> > >>>>> In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
> > >>>>> the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
> > >>>>> exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.
>
> > >>>>> A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.
>
> > >>>>> A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave.. The
> > >>>>> C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
> > >>>>> C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
> > >>>>> experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
> > >>>>> the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
> > >>>>> it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
> > >>>>> travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
> > >>>>> associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
> > >>>>> there is no interference.
>
> > >>>>> The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity.
>
> > >>>>> Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate
> > >>>>> displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past
> > >>>>> the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the
> > >>>>> plates forces the plates together.
>
> > >>>>> While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed at the
> > >>>>> exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule is detected exiting a single
> > >>>>> slit. While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed and
> > >>>>> removed from the exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule creates an
> > >>>>> interference pattern.
>
> > >>>>> Explain how this is possible.
>
> > >>>>> In Aether Displacement, the C-60 molecule has an associated aether
> > >>>>> displacement wave and the C-60 molecule ALWAYS enters and exits a
> > >>>>> single slit in a double slit experiment. It is the displacement wave
> > >>>>> in the aether which enters and exits multiples slits. The displacement
> > >>>>> wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the
> > >>>>> direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detectors at the exits to the
> > >>>>> slits causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the
> > >>>>> wave into chop) and there is no interference.
>
> > >>>>> Should I post the '<crickets>' response to your non-response now, or
> > >>>>> should I wait 24 hours?
>
> > >>>> <crickets>
>
> > >>>> No one has been able to answer the question except for the one person
> > >>>> who insists the future determines the past. There is something
> > >>>> incorrect with your 'understanding' of nature if you can not answer
> > >>>> such a simple question. Not being able to answer the question is
> > >>>> evidence you do not understand the physics of nature.
>
> > >>> This is the "dare you to convince me" model of usenet interaction. As
> > >>> in, "convince me you're right, or you're wrong." Of course, there's no
> > >>> point in trying to convince a babbling psychopath or a stick of butter
> > >>> or a rusty horseshoe. There are better ways to spend one's time than
> > >>> to work hard to respond to things like this.
>
> > >> I completely agree
>
> > >> with MPC!
>
> > > You certainly have the option of engaging with him. I've learned his
> > > personality quirks and have found it to be a complete waste of time to
> > > engage with him seriously. He's too funny to ignore completely, but
> > > not so funny that he deserves more attention, especially since that's
> > > what he craves.
>
> > Too true.
>
> > Thanks
> > Bill
>
> The poster is not engaging with me, the poster is agreeing with me.
> The poster agrees a moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether
> displacement wave.

If that's what I was agreeing with then I must be stupid.
From: H.Y. ADDANDSTUFF on
On May 4, 12:11 am, Ralph Garbage <ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 3, 10:39 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 2:32 am, Bill Hobba <bho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 4/05/2010 5:54 AM, PD wrote:
>
> > > > On May 3, 10:14 am, Ralph Garbage<ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
> > > >> On May 3, 6:30 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > > >>> On May 2, 9:22 pm, mpc755<mpc...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > > >>>> On May 2, 2:39 am, mpc755<mpc...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > > >>>>> On May 1, 6:43 pm, Bill Hobba<bho...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>> On 28/04/2010 9:49 PM, mpc755 wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>>> The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
> > > >>>>>>> matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> > > >>>>>>> aether's state of displacement.
>
> > > >>>>>> And the state of the aether as determined by out inability to detect it
> > > >>>>>> is its state of actuality - ie non existent.
>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>>> Bill
>
> > > >>>>> Aether is detected every time a double slit experiment is executed.
> > > >>>>> Aether is detected in the Casimir Effect.
>
> > > >>>>> A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
> > > >>>>> at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
> > > >>>>> individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
> > > >>>>> the aether.
>
> > > >>>>> Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
> > > >>>>> as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
> > > >>>>> is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
> > > >>>>> nucleus which is the matter which is the object.
>
> > > >>>>> 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> > > >>>>> by the double solution theory
> > > >>>>> Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
>
> > > >>>>> "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
> > > >>>>> wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
> > > >>>>> of an external field acting on the particle."
>
> > > >>>>> "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
> > > >>>>> theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
> > > >>>>> where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
> > > >>>>> natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
> > > >>>>> be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
> > > >>>>> located."
>
> > > >>>>> de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
> > > >>>>> and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
> > > >>>>> the wave.
>
> > > >>>>> In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
> > > >>>>> the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
> > > >>>>> exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.
>
> > > >>>>> A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.
>
> > > >>>>> A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> > > >>>>> C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
> > > >>>>> C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
> > > >>>>> experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
> > > >>>>> the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
> > > >>>>> it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
> > > >>>>> travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
> > > >>>>> associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
> > > >>>>> there is no interference.
>
> > > >>>>> The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity.
>
> > > >>>>> Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate
> > > >>>>> displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past
> > > >>>>> the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the
> > > >>>>> plates forces the plates together.
>
> > > >>>>> While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed at the
> > > >>>>> exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule is detected exiting a single
> > > >>>>> slit. While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed and
> > > >>>>> removed from the exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule creates an
> > > >>>>> interference pattern.
>
> > > >>>>> Explain how this is possible.
>
> > > >>>>> In Aether Displacement, the C-60 molecule has an associated aether
> > > >>>>> displacement wave and the C-60 molecule ALWAYS enters and exits a
> > > >>>>> single slit in a double slit experiment. It is the displacement wave
> > > >>>>> in the aether which enters and exits multiples slits. The displacement
> > > >>>>> wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the
> > > >>>>> direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detectors at the exits to the
> > > >>>>> slits causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the
> > > >>>>> wave into chop) and there is no interference.
>
> > > >>>>> Should I post the '<crickets>' response to your non-response now, or
> > > >>>>> should I wait 24 hours?
>
> > > >>>> <crickets>
>
> > > >>>> No one has been able to answer the question except for the one person
> > > >>>> who insists the future determines the past. There is something
> > > >>>> incorrect with your 'understanding' of nature if you can not answer
> > > >>>> such a simple question. Not being able to answer the question is
> > > >>>> evidence you do not understand the physics of nature.
>
> > > >>> This is the "dare you to convince me" model of usenet interaction.. As
> > > >>> in, "convince me you're right, or you're wrong." Of course, there's no
> > > >>> point in trying to convince a babbling psychopath or a stick of butter
> > > >>> or a rusty horseshoe. There are better ways to spend one's time than
> > > >>> to work hard to respond to things like this.
>
> > > >> I completely agree
>
> > > >> with MPC!
>
> > > > You certainly have the option of engaging with him. I've learned his
> > > > personality quirks and have found it to be a complete waste of time to
> > > > engage with him seriously. He's too funny to ignore completely, but
> > > > not so funny that he deserves more attention, especially since that's
> > > > what he craves.
>
> > > Too true.
>
> > > Thanks
> > > Bill
>
> > The poster is not engaging with me, the poster is agreeing with me.
> > The poster agrees a moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether
> > displacement wave.
>
> If that's what I was agreeing with then I must be stupid.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

If - this statement is used to open an exact proof p = np, if this is
true or false, do this.
= is equals, != equals not
{ is open function, } is close function
//comments here and more there
<!---// starts the script, //---> closes it.
http://meami.org/