Mass-Energy Equivalence [Math]

Prev: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 6th Edition Incropera, DeWitt Solutions Manual
Next: From the book: "How to Succeed in College Mathematics - A Guide for the College Mathematics Student", Richard M. Dahlke, Ph.D., 2008.

From: mpc755 on 5 May 2010 21:46

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

"The basic concept behind any fusion reaction is to bring two or more
atoms close enough together so that the residual strong force (nuclear
force) in their nuclei will pull them together into one larger atom.
If two light nuclei fuse, they will generally form a single nucleus
with a slightly smaller mass than the sum of their original masses.
The difference in mass is released as energy according to Albert
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc^2."

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
I named this material mæther.
Aether is decompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther.

The released mass is decompressed mæther. The released mass is aether.

The physical effects of decompression is energy.

Mass is conserved.

From: BURT on 5 May 2010 23:04

On May 5, 3:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 6:03 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > in other words, well after they reified Newton's corpuscle
> > in 1905; and everyone has been confused by the Copenhagenschoolers,
> > since then, about Young's simple findings.
>
> http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
> 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> by the double solution theory
> Louis de BROGLIE'
>
> "EDITOR'S NOTE. Historically, Einstein was the one who started all the
> trouble in 1905, with the introduction of this wave-particle dualism
> in radiation theory. Louis de Broglie did not ease the pressure in
> theoretical physics when he later on extended the puzzling dualism to
> every entity of Universe, not only photons, but also electrons, atoms,
> molecules, etc. And he was right, that is the way things work, and
> physicists have to accept facts, however upsetting.
> But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first lines of his
> article, was a realist, and he could not believe observable physical
> phenomena to only follow from abstract mathematical wave-functions.
> Somehow, these latter had to be connected to real waves, at variance
> with the prevailing Copenhagen interpretation, and with his keen sense
> for physics, Louis de Broglie did find a way out of the maze !"
>
> The real waves are aether waves.

Waves go away when light flow is present at the two slits.
The light wave has the ability to collapse the electric matter wave.
Somethings happen in the presence of light.

Mitch Raemsch

>
>
> > > Hey -- de Broglie got his Nobel Prize/Physics in 1929.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: BURT on 5 May 2010 23:12

On May 5, 8:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 3:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 6:03 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > in other words, well after they reified Newton's corpuscle
> > > in 1905; and everyone has been confused by the Copenhagenschoolers,
> > > since then, about Young's simple findings.
>
> >http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
> > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> > by the double solution theory
> > Louis de BROGLIE'
>
> > "EDITOR'S NOTE. Historically, Einstein was the one who started all the
> > trouble in 1905, with the introduction of this wave-particle dualism
> > in radiation theory. Louis de Broglie did not ease the pressure in
> > theoretical physics when he later on extended the puzzling dualism to
> > every entity of Universe, not only photons, but also electrons, atoms,
> > molecules, etc. And he was right, that is the way things work, and
> > physicists have to accept facts, however upsetting.
> > But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first lines of his
> > article, was a realist, and he could not believe observable physical
> > phenomena to only follow from abstract mathematical wave-functions.
> > Somehow, these latter had to be connected to real waves, at variance
> > with the prevailing Copenhagen interpretation, and with his keen sense
> > for physics, Louis de Broglie did find a way out of the maze !"
>
> > The real waves are aether waves.
>
> Waves go away when light flow is present at the two slits.
> The light wave has the ability to collapse the electric matter wave.
> Somethings happen in the presence of light.
>
> Mitch Raemsch
>

Light waves can collapse aether waves. This is a light flow phenomenon
on aether matter.

Mitch Raemsch
>
>
>
> > > > Hey -- de Broglie got his Nobel Prize/Physics in 1929.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: mpc755 on 5 May 2010 23:33

On May 5, 11:12 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 8:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 3:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 5, 6:03 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > in other words, well after they reified Newton's corpuscle
> > > > in 1905; and everyone has been confused by the Copenhagenschoolers,
> > > > since then, about Young's simple findings.
>
> > >http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
> > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> > > by the double solution theory
> > > Louis de BROGLIE'
>
> > > "EDITOR'S NOTE. Historically, Einstein was the one who started all the
> > > trouble in 1905, with the introduction of this wave-particle dualism
> > > in radiation theory. Louis de Broglie did not ease the pressure in
> > > theoretical physics when he later on extended the puzzling dualism to
> > > every entity of Universe, not only photons, but also electrons, atoms,
> > > molecules, etc. And he was right, that is the way things work, and
> > > physicists have to accept facts, however upsetting.
> > > But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first lines of his
> > > article, was a realist, and he could not believe observable physical
> > > phenomena to only follow from abstract mathematical wave-functions.
> > > Somehow, these latter had to be connected to real waves, at variance
> > > with the prevailing Copenhagen interpretation, and with his keen sense
> > > for physics, Louis de Broglie did find a way out of the maze !"
>
> > > The real waves are aether waves.
>
> > Waves go away when light flow is present at the two slits.
> > The light wave has the ability to collapse the electric matter wave.
> > Somethings happen in the presence of light.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Light waves can collapse aether waves. This is a light flow phenomenon
> on aether matter.
>
> Mitch Raemsch
>

Light waves are aether waves.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
by the double solution theory
Louis de BROGLIE'
http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
of an external field acting on the particle."

"This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
located."

de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
the wave.

In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
the photon 'particle' occupies a very small region of the associated
aether wave and enters and exits a single slit. The aether wave enters
and exits the available slits.

>
>
> > > > > Hey -- de Broglie got his Nobel Prize/Physics in 1929.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>

From: spudnik on 6 May 2010 01:15

in other words,
just substitute the word "aether"
for the word "energy" in any dyscussiom
of "physics" -- thanks, Nuevo Einstein!

thus, was maether born (and,
presumably, antimaether).

> The physical effects of decompression is energy.