Math
in [Science]
|
PROOF OF A WEIGHTED MINUS 1 IN PURE MATHEMATICS-- ERROR OF SQRT 3 The Proof is simple and not understood by the "Fermatists" for centuries that Math is not at zero and +1 , but a - weighted minus 1 and 3 1*1=1 1+1=2 2-1= 1*********** 1 equalizes with1 2*2=4 2+2=4 4-4=0 3 *3=9 3+3=6 9-6=3*********** 3 equalizes with 3 It is simple a 1 before a... 31 Jul 2010 15:05
inequality question Hello, Consider a set of pairs (r_k,x_k) for k=1...n. Assume that r_k>=0 and 1>=x_k>=0. Let s be any number such that s>=sum_k r_k. Does the following always hold? If yes, how you prove it? sum_k ((r_k /s)*(x_k^2)) >= (sum_k (r_k/s)*x_k)^2 Thanks Golabi ... 2 Aug 2010 05:59
an irreducible cubic? Can anybody prove or disprove that the cubic r x^3 - (r^2 + r + 1)x^2 - (r^3 - 1)x + r^2(r^2 + r + 1) = 0 is irreducible for all integers r /= 0? Kent Holing, Norway ... 3 Aug 2010 12:33
Try to solve a quartic equation I am trying to learn how to solve a quartic equation. In "Summary of Ferrari's method" of page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartic_function a root in the most simple case is x = -B/4/A + sqrt((-alfa + sqrt(alfa^2 - 4*gama))/2) My question is how to know the express inside sqrt is not negative: how to know alf... 2 Aug 2010 03:50
Solution space of sum atan(x_k)<a ? Hello, Consider the problem: sum_k arctan(x_k) < a where k=1,...n and x_k are real variables and "a" is a given constant. You choose a specific choice of values for x_1,...x_n and give it to me. I should give you one of these two answers: "your choice satsfies the inequality" or "I don't know". Of course, I... 2 Aug 2010 07:04
STATIC UNIVERSE: EINSTEINIANA'S NEW MONEY-SPINNER The old money-spinner: http://www.physorg.com/news179508040.html "More than a dozen ground-based Dark Energy projects are proposed or under way, and at least four space-based missions, each of the order of a billion dollars, are at the design concept stage." The new money-spinner (in Einsteiniana's schizophren... 2 Aug 2010 02:46
scientists and a glimpse of theory making Osher Doctorow wrote: From Osher Doctorow I've also gotten some arguably interesting results tying in related 2 or 1/2 ratios and also 0.43 to 0.488 ratios in my last few posts in my Quantum Gravity thread. Osher Doctorow Supporting evidence comes from observational evidence of those exopla... 31 Jul 2010 02:10
converting "pi base" to "e base" Re: Euclidean geom = Elliptic unioned Hyperbolic #4.33 & #249 Correcting Math & Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Looks like I invented some new terms here of: (a) ReCalculus to signify the strip-building rather than the decomposition into picket-fences of Calculus. I looked up the word "calculus" and surprized to find it is a Latin word th... 31 Jul 2010 01:05
Chapt17: solar system evidence Re: Discovered! - Exoplanets in Tight 2:1 Resonance #248 Atom Totality Robert L. Oldershaw wrote: Well, well. There was another pleasant surprise in the science news yesterday. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100728092633.htm Astronomers have discovered an "unusual" planetary system wherein the two planets orbit the system's core object in a relative... 31 Jul 2010 12:54
Quartic equation Hi, I am trying to learn how to solve a quartic equation. In page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartic_function I found the "Summary of Ferrari's method" part looks easier for me but still have two difficulties: 1. Do you think I can solve a general quartic equation by only following this part and ignoring all th... 31 Jul 2010 04:18 |