Minkowski Metric.
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Infinite vs. instant
Next: It's a heatwave
From: eric gisse on 9 Jun 2010 21:18 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...basic optics...] > > That would be true only if light travels at exactly c BETWEEN atoms. You reject Earthbound experiments which prove ballistic theory wrong, why not say all of optics is wrong too? > >>The phase shift caused by the atomic interactions in >>a dielectric has been known for more than a century, Henry. > > It is assumed. It is also observed. The existence of phased array radar and radio interferometry ought to tell you something, but it won't. > How can you distinguish between a phase shift and a time lag? You start by knowing the difference. > >>How come you didn't know that? > > How come you just decided to mention it after I raised the subject? > >> >> Will you keep fleeing, Henry? >> > >> > From what? Relativist ignorance? >> >> From the challenge: >> >>If we write the speed of light in moving water as c/n + xv >>then the fringe displacement in M&M's repetition of Fizeau will be: >> delta = (4Lvn^2/lambda.c)x > > I thought you claimed that the speed in water was c. > >>The challenge is to answer this question: >>Do you still refute it? > > Renshaw refuted it. Cling to that life preserver no matter what it turns out to be, Henri! > >>In case the answer is yes, please show what >>you think the correct equation should be. >> >>I see you now have given up referring to Renshaw's >>calculation, so now you had to invent a new idiocy: >>you claim that the equation which predicts the difference >>in the phase shifts of the two light beams does not include >>the phase shift caused by atomic interactions in the water. >> >>Make my day, repeat that claim! >> >>Will you keep fleeing, Henry ? > > If you want to talk about phase shifts, what about the shift from the 45 > mirror in a sagnac interferometer? It affects only one beam. Yes, move on to a more complicated subject when the basics fly over your head. > > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 9 Jun 2010 22:36 On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:18:26 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >[...basic optics...] > >> >> That would be true only if light travels at exactly c BETWEEN atoms. > >You reject Earthbound experiments which prove ballistic theory wrong, why >not say all of optics is wrong too? > >> >>>The phase shift caused by the atomic interactions in >>>a dielectric has been known for more than a century, Henry. >> >> It is assumed. > >It is also observed. The existence of phased array radar and radio >interferometry ought to tell you something, but it won't. > >> How can you distinguish between a phase shift and a time lag? > >You start by knowing the difference. > >> >>>How come you didn't know that? >> >> How come you just decided to mention it after I raised the subject? >> >>> >> Will you keep fleeing, Henry? >>> > >>> > From what? Relativist ignorance? >>> >>> From the challenge: >>> >>>If we write the speed of light in moving water as c/n + xv >>>then the fringe displacement in M&M's repetition of Fizeau will be: >>> delta = (4Lvn^2/lambda.c)x >> >> I thought you claimed that the speed in water was c. >> >>>The challenge is to answer this question: >>>Do you still refute it? >> >> Renshaw refuted it. > >Cling to that life preserver no matter what it turns out to be, Henri! > >> >>>In case the answer is yes, please show what >>>you think the correct equation should be. >>> >>>I see you now have given up referring to Renshaw's >>>calculation, so now you had to invent a new idiocy: >>>you claim that the equation which predicts the difference >>>in the phase shifts of the two light beams does not include >>>the phase shift caused by atomic interactions in the water. >>> >>>Make my day, repeat that claim! >>> >>>Will you keep fleeing, Henry ? >> >> If you want to talk about phase shifts, what about the shift from the 45 >> mirror in a sagnac interferometer? It affects only one beam. > >Yes, move on to a more complicated subject when the basics fly over your >head. ........poor little eric....too many books and not enough brains... Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 9 Jun 2010 22:40 On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:52:00 +1000, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> wrote: >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:34501691b1ub8tk2fjvugb1fu2cie4s468(a)4ax.com... >[snip] >> When the human race comes to its senses, the new six days of the week will >> be >> named Wday, Iday, Lday, Sday, Oday, Nday. > >Bahaha .. you're such a clown. If I want to be...but you have to admit a six day week would be much more appropriate these days. .....and like I said, EVERYBODY would be better off. Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 10 Jun 2010 03:45 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...] > .......poor little eric....too many books and not enough brains... Notice how you can't even respond to what I say anymore without resorting to one-liners when you get cornered. Sad. > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: Paul B. Andersen on 10 Jun 2010 16:38
On 10.06.2010 00:23, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:40:25 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" > <paul.b.andersen(a)somewhere.no> wrote: > >> The fully qualified physicist with degrees in math and physics, >> Doctor, Henry Wilson yet again displays his incredible ignorance >> of math and physics. >> >> Do you see that 'n' in the equation, Henry ? No, I didn't write that. I wrote: << The fully qualified physicist with degrees in math and physics, Doctor Ralph Rabbidge, yet again displays his incredible ignorance of math and physics. Do you see that 'n' in the equation, Ralph? >> This demonstrates: 1. The person calling himself Henry Wilson admits that his real name is Ralph Rabbidge. 2. The person calling himself Henry Wilson is a notorious liar, who even fake quotations. -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ |