Minkowski Metric.
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Infinite vs. instant
Next: It's a heatwave
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 11 Jun 2010 17:11 On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:38:29 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On 6/10/10 6:31 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:10:11 -0500, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 6/10/10 5:14 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >>>> Time = velocity x distance >>>> (: >>>> Interesting...... >>> >>> Given that velocity, v = dx/dt >>> >>> amd speed = |v| = d/t >>> >>> t = distance/speed >>> >>> Henri is making no sense again! >> >> I was repeating what Paul claimed, you idiot. >> >> So you agree, Andersen is making no sense again? >> >> >> Henry Wilson... >> >> .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. > > All I can say, Henri, is that your posting record indicates > you don't much know physics. So the fact that PA made a blunder proves I know little about physics? Is that the way your mind works, wormey? No wonder you're silly enough worship Einstein. Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: spudnik on 11 Jun 2010 17:42 so, how is gold, the color of relativity? > It requires that the beams travel at c+/-v wrt the source. thus&so: I read [*] the name of the unindicted co-conspirator of HDubya in Iran-contra, Oliver "Buck" Revell, who laid down the law at the NSF meeting, that "global" cooling would henceforth not be funded. see, I put that word in scare-quotes, becuase it was the self- same flat-map miscomprehension of insolation -- merely the differential from pole to equator -- that presupposes that glaciation requires a lesser temperature, or that deglaciation'd require a greater one. * http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/ --Stop BP's and Waxman's arbitrageur's delight, the cap&trade that the WSUrinal *calls*, Captain Tax (but, there seems to be no provision for goment revenues )-!... Fermat's Next Theorem: http://wlym.com
From: Paul B. Andersen on 12 Jun 2010 10:51 On 11.06.2010 23:09, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: > How about correcting your sagnac screw up. Can't you do it for me? http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/sagnac_ring.pdf http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/FourMirrorSagnac.html Please correct them. -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
From: eric gisse on 12 Jun 2010 22:09 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [....] >>>> Your question: >>>> "How can you distinguish between a phase shift and a time lag?" >>>> is a stupid question, because the one gives the other >>>> when the angular frequency is known. >> >>This is a gem: >> >>> What's this 'angular frequency' business? >> >>The fully qualified physicist with degrees in math and physics, >>Doctor Henry Wilson, yet again demonstrates his expertise >>in elementary physics. :-) > > Hahahahha! This quite hilarious. > Do you consider a photon as being similar to a spinning wheel? How many > RPM does a red one do? > If you are refering to phase angles, then please say so. Unless you know > something the rest of the world doesn't, photons don't have 'angular > fequencies'. How did you get a degree in physics without passing a course in classical electrodynamics, Henri? [...]
From: eric gisse on 13 Jun 2010 19:52
...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...] > That is probably why I am the only person who contributes any real physics > to this NG. You couldn't solve a graduate mechanics problem if your life depended on it. [...] |