From: Andrei Popescu on
On Mi, 30 iun 10, 10:29:20, Merciadri Luca wrote:

> I find this perfect, but it should be coupled with the impossibility of
> putting on two partitions the same stuff, i.e. putting /var on two
> partitions, for example.

For this there would have to be two /var in the tree ;)

Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
From: Merciadri Luca on
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 30 iun 10, 10:29:20, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
>> I find this perfect, but it should be coupled with the impossibility of
>> putting on two partitions the same stuff, i.e. putting /var on two
>> partitions, for example.
>>
>
> For this there would have to be two /var in the tree ;)
>
Yes, but

* your idea of the tree is a good idea (at least to me);
* in the installation procedure, one can choose to install the same
stuff at different places. Or the effect of choosing such a thing is
undocumented, and it should not be interesting to do.

--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.


Love is like war, Easy to start, Hard to end, Impossible to forget.

From: Alan Chandler on
On 30/06/10 09:29, Merciadri Luca wrote:

> I find this perfect, but it should be coupled with the impossibility of
> putting on two partitions the same stuff, i.e. putting /var on two
> partitions, for example.
>


You are still talking backwards

You put the partition (/dev/sdXY) on /var not the other way round. You
DON'T put /var on /dev/sdXY

If you imagine there is a conceptual drawing of the tree starting at /
and including all the major mount points - with the non standard mount
points being creatable manually, and somewhere below a list of
unallocated partitions.

Then you could drag any partition (from the unallocated list or from
another mount point) and drop it on mount point you wanted. If that
mount point already had a partition at that point it would warn you, and
if you said continue would move the old partition back into the
unallocated list. If you said don't continue it would leave the old one
where it was and the new one would return from whence it came.





--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4C2B2DD7.2070009(a)chandlerfamily.org.uk
From: Merciadri Luca on
Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 30/06/10 09:29, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> I find this perfect, but it should be coupled with the impossibility of
>> putting on two partitions the same stuff, i.e. putting /var on two
>> partitions, for example.
>>
>
>
> You are still talking backwards
>
> You put the partition (/dev/sdXY) on /var not the other way round.
> You DON'T put /var on /dev/sdXY
/
>
> If you imagine there is a conceptual drawing of the tree starting at /
> and including all the major mount points - with the non standard mount
> points being creatable manually, and somewhere below a list of
> unallocated partitions.
>
> Then you could drag any partition (from the unallocated list or from
> another mount point) and drop it on mount point you wanted. If that
> mount point already had a partition at that point it would warn you,
> and if you said continue would move the old partition back into the
> unallocated list. If you said don't continue it would leave the old
> one where it was and the new one would return from whence it came.
That's the way it should be done. But it isn't.

--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.


The heart has reasons that reason does not understand. (Jacques Bossuet)

From: Daniel Barclay on
Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 30/06/10 09:29, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> I find this perfect, but it should be coupled with the impossibility of
>> putting on two partitions the same stuff, i.e. putting /var on two
>> partitions, for example.
>>
>
>
> You are still talking backwards
>
> You put the partition (/dev/sdXY) on /var not the other way round. You
> DON'T put /var on /dev/sdXY

Not exactly.

Yes, it's the other way around when you're talking about _mounting_
the partition at the mount point.

However, you can certainly talk about putting /var on a partition,
to refers to putting the subtree of file and directories rooted at
/var on that partition (or to causing that to happen, by assigning
the (initial empty) directory /var to a partition by saying to mount
that partition at /var (and then have the installer populate it)).


Daniel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4C2B8ED7.9040302(a)fgm.com