Most limited Netbook ever made!
in [Laptops]
|
From: felmon on 25 Dec 2009 12:46 On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:13:14 -0600, BillW50 wrote: > Most programs > doesn't like this 6 hour low quality DVD format. sorry for the quick follow-up. I don't know if ffmpeg (or mencoder) can deal with the specific format you want. Felmon
From: felmon on 25 Dec 2009 12:50 On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:41:20 -0600, BillW50 wrote: > Like the Linux/Unix command sudo for example! It doesn't even sound > English. pseudo. I thought it was a pun. Felmon
From: felmon on 25 Dec 2009 15:22 On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:50:17 -0700, AJL wrote: > These DOS commands work on my 2G Surf: > > CD > CLS > COPY > DATE > DEL > DIR > ECHO > EXIT > FC > FIND > HOSTNAME > MKDIR > MORE > PING > REN > SET > TIME > TYPE... does your setup have some kind of 'alias' file for some of these? only some of these commands seem native to bash. for instance 'copy', 'cls', 'del', 'ren' and a couple more do nothing in Debian 5.x or OpenSUSE 10.0, using bash. Felmon
From: AJL on 25 Dec 2009 22:45 felmon <nemo(a)nowhere.INVALID> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:50:17 -0700, AJL wrote: > >> These DOS commands work on my 2G Surf: >> >> CD >> CLS >> COPY >> DATE >> DEL >> DIR >> ECHO >> EXIT >> FC >> FIND >> HOSTNAME >> MKDIR >> MORE >> PING >> REN >> SET >> TIME >> TYPE... > >does your setup have some kind of 'alias' file for some of these? It is an Asus version of Xandros that came in my Eee PC 2G Surf netbook. >only some of these commands seem native to bash. For the heck of it (too much time on my hands) I compared: MSDOS at http://www.computerhope.com/msdos.htm#02 to Bash at http://ss64.com/bash/ And found an even longer list of common commands so apparently my little box isn't that unusual...: break cd date dir echo enable exit expand fdisk find for format ftp help hostname if mkdir more netstst nslookup ping popd pushd rename rmdir set shift shutdown sort time type
From: Richard Bonner on 29 Dec 2009 11:38
AJL (339(a)fakeaddress.com) wrote: > ak621(a)chebucto.ns.ca (Richard Bonner) wrote: > >AJL (340(a)fakeaddress.com) wrote: > >> Since the advent of the smartphone most popular websites have a > >> 'mobile' version that is designed for a small phone screen but also > >> works very well on a modern wireless PDA as well. No scrolling > >> required... > > > >*** True, but it means more work for a webpage author to design two > >versions of a website. > They do it to attract those mucho-million small screen users. More > eyeballs means more ad bux. So don't shed too many tears for those > poor overworked authors... ;) *** No tears shed, but floating pages should serve the purpose for most devices. I have most recently checked mine on a Nintendo and an iPod Touch. -- Richard Bonner http://www.chebucto.ca/~ak621/DOS/ |