From: Michael A. Terrell on 3 Aug 2006 14:33 John Fields wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:05:11 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian > <null(a)example.net> wrote: > > >My point is, that a person who claims that war can be reduced by making > >more war is clearly insane. It's like trying to put out a fire by pouring > >gasoline on it. > > --- > That's a stupid analogy. > > Our getting involved in WW2 and making more war obviously reduced > the number of casualties and the length of the war. > > Using the analogy of burning a fire bridge to contain an existing > conflagration in order to let it burn itself out is more accurate. > > -- > John Fields > Professional Circuit Designer Its a good thing Rich doesn't have to fight forest fires. The concept of a backfire would cause his tiny brain to implode. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Eeyore on 3 Aug 2006 14:37 "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > John Fields wrote: > > > > On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:05:11 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian > > <null(a)example.net> wrote: > > > > >My point is, that a person who claims that war can be reduced by making > > >more war is clearly insane. It's like trying to put out a fire by pouring > > >gasoline on it. > > > > --- > > That's a stupid analogy. > > > > Our getting involved in WW2 and making more war obviously reduced > > the number of casualties and the length of the war. > > > > Using the analogy of burning a fire bridge to contain an existing > > conflagration in order to let it burn itself out is more accurate. > > > > -- > > John Fields > > Professional Circuit Designer > > Its a good thing Rich doesn't have to fight forest fires. The > concept of a backfire would cause his tiny brain to implode. Has anyone ever mentioned to you that you're out of your depth ? Graham
From: Frank Bemelman on 3 Aug 2006 14:41 "Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> schreef in bericht news:4jetnlF7nbi8U1(a)individual.net... > > Oh... and Israel would disappear down the historical plughole. And good riddance with it. -- Thanks, Frank. (remove 'q' and '.invalid' when replying by email)
From: John Woodgate on 3 Aug 2006 14:35 In message <spd4d2p94a17j8g2sfqo5rp33c28mp37m2(a)4ax.com>, dated Thu, 3 Aug 2006, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> writes >Think about this: What do you think would happen if we weren't here? The oceans would drain away into the hole? -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: John Fields on 3 Aug 2006 14:46
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 02:26:16 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> wrote: >John Fields wrote: >> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:33:35 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax >> --- >> LOL, you were there, huh? > >I was around, and complaining about Saddam being a tyrannical murderer, >when he was your good pal and Rummy was photographed shaking his hand. --- We try to give everyone second and third chances... -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |