New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 5 Aug 2006 16:07 On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:39:02 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Phat Bytestard wrote: > >> Yet another utterly retarded behavior on your part. > >Have you *nothing* to offer other than abuse ? It does mark you out as being of no >consequence and something of a waste ot time and space. > >I doubt you're even capable of thinking for yourself from what I see here. Trotting >out the nonsense you've been fed, parrot fashion, doesn't 'make it' in a debate. > Who was I parroting when I argued about Britain's involvement with state of the art modern technologies being used in current allied military gear? You could be a little more retarded, but not in this life.
From: Eeyore on 5 Aug 2006 16:12 Phat Bytestard wrote: > On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 16:00:46 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >> > >> Nope, it's quite simple. It's called war (declared by Iran, BTW). > > > >You're pathetic. > > No. He is correct. Where have you been? He's wrong. Iran no more declared war on the USA than the USA did on Iran with the 'Axis of Evil' speech. Both were examples of political rhetoric. Not sure about that - it may be a bit of a big word for you. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rhetoric The difference of course is that you believe it's ok for the USA to indulge in it about other countries but not vice-versa, 2 faced as you always are. Graham
From: John Woodgate on 5 Aug 2006 16:09 In message <n7q9d2thm7i2tlsrsep0lkimgsrfvljgk7(a)4ax.com>, dated Sat, 5 Aug 2006, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> writes >what you're interested in doping is needling me. Very Freudian! (;-) -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: John Woodgate on 5 Aug 2006 16:13 In message <ams9d2tksts40a3lndlfb3m1vu9391ridl(a)4ax.com>, dated Sat, 5 Aug 2006, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> writes >It has so much BIST that it barely works at all. BIST? British Ingenuity Still Triumphs? -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: John Fields on 5 Aug 2006 16:24
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:39:05 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:59:18 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >I was hard pressed to find a good description. You see I don't *hate* the US nor >> >does anyone else I know. >> > >> >Exasperated about the USA would be more accurate. >> >> --- >> Because we're conducting our affairs in ways of which you >> disapprove, and while we're happy to take that into consideration, >> in the long run we'll do what we want to. >> >> What I find incongruous is that so many of you all (Europeans, I >> guess.) would rather turn a blind eye toward the middle east and let >> Israel die than to help her. Why is that? > >What makes you think we want Israel to 'die' ? --- Your condemnation of the US's moral and financial help to Israel seems to me to indicate that you'd like to see Israel go it alone, which I think would make it rather more likely that Israel would be militarily conquered and all of its Jewish population that couldn't get out subjected to another holocaust. Do you doubt that? --- >There seems to be an entire lack of >subtlety in US views such as talking about hate when it's not too. --- "When it's not too?" I don't understand what that means. --- >Besides Israel doesn't *need* any 'help' in the sense that the US gives it ffs ! --- What resources other than the US's help do you think Israel has which it could use to defend against a perpetual attack and not fall? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |