New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 1 Aug 2006 01:06 John Larkin wrote: > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:13:23 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >John Larkin wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 04:04:26 +0100, Eeyore > >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >This is the kind of attitude that makes the USA so truly loathesome. > >> > >> We like it! > > > >Which only goes to show how out of sync the USA is with the entire rest of the > >world. Along with gas-guzzling SUVs, 400 lb human beings and all that other > >nonsense too. > > Whoa, we're talking some serious nationalistic stereotyping here. You'll see more of those things in the USA than anywhere else ! I do hate those stereotypes too but the last time I saw some American tourists in London I'm afraid they simply fitted the bill perfectly. > As if Europe is "the entire rest of the world", which it sure ain't. It's more 'in sync' with it though. > And I recently read that the French women are getting fat, too. Last > time I was in Oxford, most of the engineers and scientists I was > working with were a lot rounder than I am. > > My wife weighs 105, and I like her that way. > > How much do you weigh? More than I'd like I'll admit. Not enough exercise recently. I don't even know the figure to be honest. Graham
From: Eeyore on 1 Aug 2006 01:10 John Larkin wrote: > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:14:11 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >Phat Bytestard wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:47:16 +0100, Eeyore > >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > >> > >> >They see things from another perspective of course. Maybe you should think about > >> >that. > >> > >> The word for today for you is propaganda. That is what you are a > >> victim of. > > > >Fuuny how I see it *exactly* the other way. Along with the other 95% of humanity. > > Hardly 95%. The Indians and, even more, the Chinese see radical Islam > as a threat. 2.5 billion right there. It wasn't Islam I had in mind. Graham
From: Eeyore on 1 Aug 2006 01:08 John Larkin wrote: > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:15:04 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Automatic assault weapons are certainly legal. > > > >Graham > > Possession of an automatic weapon (or a bazooka, or explosives, or a > sawed-off shotgun) is a Federal felony here. It seems I had semi-autos in mind. It's a tricky distinction to someone not used to them. Don't semi-atos simply have a single shot mode too ? Doesn't stop them being used for automatic fire AIUI. Graham
From: Eeyore on 1 Aug 2006 01:12 "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > > > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > > > > > you're just another brainless Eurosheep. :( > > > > I can think for myself. Something that seems beyond your capability. > > > > Graham > > No, I think that you're an effeminate Eurosheep. Your obsession with gender issues is again noted. Graham
From: Eeyore on 1 Aug 2006 01:13
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > Good, then we won't have to buy their crappy exports anymore. Fine. We won't buy yours then ! Nerr, nerr, nerr ! LMAO ! Have you seriously got nothing better to offer ? Graham |