New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 1 Aug 2006 08:14 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:50:38 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Phat Bytestard wrote: > >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 04:25:54 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >> > As for bombing the UN too !!!!! >> >> For all you know (trust me you do not) it was Hezbollah that killed >> them, and blamed it on the Israelis. > >Actually, think it came from a plane, and the last time I checked, Hezbollah >didn't have an air force ! > Ten retards pointing up in the air is not proof of origin.
From: Phat Bytestard on 1 Aug 2006 08:19 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:58:40 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Phat Bytestard wrote: > >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:11:25 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >> > >> >Neither does the Moslem one. >> >> Then why are the fucktards doing it? > >Because life isn't fair ? > That's also why we have uninformed, politically manipulated twits like you in these groups spewing disinformation.
From: Phat Bytestard on 1 Aug 2006 08:25 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 06:12:22 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: >> > >> > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: >> > >> > > you're just another brainless Eurosheep. :( >> > >> > I can think for myself. Something that seems beyond your capability. >> > >> > Graham >> >> No, I think that you're an effeminate Eurosheep. > >Your obsession with gender issues is again noted. > Stop being a nutless wuss then.
From: Phat Bytestard on 1 Aug 2006 08:34 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 06:59:36 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: >> > >> > John Larkin wrote: >> > >> > > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:15:04 +0100, Eeyore >> > > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > >Automatic assault weapons are certainly legal. >> > > > >> > > >Graham >> > > >> > > Possession of an automatic weapon (or a bazooka, or explosives, or a >> > > sawed-off shotgun) is a Federal felony here. >> > >> > It seems I had semi-autos in mind. It's a tricky distinction to someone not used to >> > them. Don't semi-atos simply have a single shot mode too ? Doesn't stop them being used >> > for automatic fire AIUI. >> > >> > Graham >> >> You have it backwards. Automatic fire requires a fully automatic >> weapon, but they can be fired in single shot or short bursts like the >> M16 and M60. > >Ok. Got it although there seems to have been some dispute over the terms. > >" There is some casual dispute over the correct use of the words automatic and >semi-automatic. Gun enthusiasts sometimes argue that the word automatic is incorrectly linked >to fully-automatic fire and that an automatic weapon is simply any weapon that chambers a new >round during the extraction of the previous cartridge's casing. " >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-automatic > Do you actually know ANYTHING yourself?
From: Phat Bytestard on 1 Aug 2006 08:36
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:02:31 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >It's so rare for me to see someone with such a bizarre notion of what 'being a >man' means ! It's not smart to be cannon-fodder you know. > Coming from someone that has the mental maturity of a freshly pinched turd, and has ZERO honor and ZERO character, I'd say that any definition you would give is 100% without any credibility. Hell, you don't even know what a semi-auto weapon is, little girl. |