From: Jim Thompson on 22 Oct 2005 12:05 On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:00:01 +0200, "Fred Bartoli" <fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli(a)RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> wrote: > >"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone(a)example.com> a ?crit dans le message de >news:eknkl11gtvb8skuvqn6mgvhbecqm07srgb(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:55:15 +0200, "Fred Bartoli" >> <fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli(a)RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> wrote: >> >> > >> >"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone(a)example.com> a ?crit dans le message de >> >news:0b5jl1tt604q2fgbnftujf0ptsukoj22lh(a)4ax.com... >> >> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:33:29 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie" >> >> <fff(a)example.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 07:15:19 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Bob Stephens wrote... >> >> >>> Winfield Hill wrote: >> >> >>>> Rich Grise wrote... >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Dibs on a half share of ROFLMAOPIMP! >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> PIMP? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I'm guessing it's 'peeing in my pants'? Perhaps some of our >> >> >>> older viewers can give us the benefit of their experience? ;)~ >> >> >> >> >> >> It's probably what George Bush was doing as he sat frozen with >> >> >> a story book in front of the children, for six minutes after >> >> >> being told the U.S. was under attack. >> >> > >> >> >Oh, Win, come on, give it a rest. You're clearly under some kind >> >> >of deadline or something, and getting all stressed out about it >> >> >because things aren't going as planned, and you're stuck in the >> >> >unenviable position of explaining to the tenured elders why >> >> >reality doesn't fit in with their preconceptions. >> >> > >> >> >Will any airplanes crash if it's late? Will anybody die? >> >> > >> >> >Then relax! Have a margarita and a nice hot bath. We'll live. >> >> > >> >> >(Notwhithstanding it's not nice to kick a guy when he's down. ;-> ) >> >> > >> >> >Cheers! >> >> >Rich >> >> >> >> Win is so leftist he can't be rational ;-) >> >> >> > >> >Does being right wing makes you Real? >> >> Right on the positive real axis ;-) >> > >So... unstable... and unimaginative? We produce power instead of sucking it ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: John Larkin on 22 Oct 2005 12:06 On 22 Oct 2005 03:20:11 -0700, Winfield Hill <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >keith wrote... >> >> How come we get all the leftists on the right coast? >> Blue-nosed red-statist leftists, at that! ;-) > > You think it's funny to smear other group members, but > George Bush is an idiot, pure and simple, and is doing > us all more damage than we should put up with. That's > not the least bit funny. I can't understand how you > right-wingers put up with him. When are y'all going to > wake up, clear your eyes, and see him for what he is? Part of the reason is that a largish number of Americans actually want ineffective Federal government... I sure do... so if they accept Bush as inept, that's fine with them. And if they accept him as a politically-skilled conservative, that's just about as good. Liberals, meaning people who want lots of government involvement in everything, assume that a successful, activist President is desirable. Lots of people disagree, which is why we so often elect a President from one party and a Congress from the other, or why we so seldom elect Senators or VPs or policy wonks to the Presidency. And I don't personally see what damage he's causing, especially if you compare him to train-wreck administrations like Johnson, Carter, or Clinton. If you refer to whining by Europeans, that ain't damage. John
From: Fred Bartoli on 22 Oct 2005 12:28 "Jim Thompson" <thegreatone(a)example.com> a ?crit dans le message de news:ppokl190h87fvntp3813bnlh51h08hiur1(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:00:01 +0200, "Fred Bartoli" > <fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli(a)RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> >(Notwhithstanding it's not nice to kick a guy when he's down. ;-> ) > >> >> > > >> >> >Cheers! > >> >> >Rich > >> >> > >> >> Win is so leftist he can't be rational ;-) > >> >> > >> > > >> >Does being right wing makes you Real? > >> > >> Right on the positive real axis ;-) > >> > > > >So... unstable... and unimaginative? > > We produce power instead of sucking it ;-) > Hence right wingers are responsible for global warming. That's very nice of you to finally admit it :-) -- Thanks, Fred.
From: keith on 22 Oct 2005 12:27 On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:48:24 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote: > keith wrote... >> >> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:20:11 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote: >> >>> keith wrote... >>>> >>>> How come we get all the leftists on the right coast? >>>> Blue-nosed red-statist leftists, at that! ;-) >>> >>> You think it's funny to smear other group members, but >>> George Bush is an idiot, pure and simple, and is doing >>> us all more damage than we should put up with. That's >>> not the least bit funny. I can't understand how you >>> right-wingers put up with him. When are y'all going to >>> wake up, clear your eyes, and see him for what he is? >> >> Pot, kettle,... Hate is an ugly emotion, Win. > > Right, it's very ugly when I see it in you, attacking > me, and anyone else who's a smidgen to the left of you. Me hate? Nah, I don't hate anyone, though some disgust me. Attack? I'm just getting trying to get your blood pressure above comatose. You leftie-weenies are so easy! Your hate is just too strong to control. -- Keith
From: keith on 22 Oct 2005 12:37
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:06:42 -0700, John Larkin wrote: > On 22 Oct 2005 03:20:11 -0700, Winfield Hill > <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: > >>keith wrote... >>> >>> How come we get all the leftists on the right coast? >>> Blue-nosed red-statist leftists, at that! ;-) >> >> You think it's funny to smear other group members, but >> George Bush is an idiot, pure and simple, and is doing >> us all more damage than we should put up with. That's >> not the least bit funny. I can't understand how you >> right-wingers put up with him. When are y'all going to >> wake up, clear your eyes, and see him for what he is? > > Part of the reason is that a largish number of Americans actually want > ineffective Federal government... I sure do... so if they accept Bush > as inept, that's fine with them. And if they accept him as a > politically-skilled conservative, that's just about as good. The problem is that he ISN'T conservative. ...but far better than the other choices available! Voting is rarely about "for", rather than "against". > Liberals, meaning people who want lots of government involvement in > everything, assume that a successful, activist President is desirable. > Lots of people disagree, which is why we so often elect a President from > one party and a Congress from the other, or why we so seldom elect > Senators or VPs or policy wonks to the Presidency. Congress gets their power by bring bacon home. To do so they collaborate to divy up the pork. The presidency is seem as more of a manager. Congress critters are seen to have no management credentials. Presidents usually come from the ranks of govenors (similar function). > And I don't personally see what damage he's causing, especially if you > compare him to train-wreck administrations like Johnson, Carter, or > Clinton. Exactly, but I'd throw Ford into that wreck too. > If you refer to whining by Europeans, that ain't damage. ....or whining by leftist right-coast blue-nosed red-statists. I just love it when the idiot Howie Dean opens his mouth. They sure picked a leader there! -- Keith |