Particles Larger Than Galaxies Fill the Universe?
in [Physics]
|
From: Sam Wormley on 9 Jul 2010 14:20 On 7/9/10 11:17 AM, Yousuf Khan wrote: > > One of the latest theories postulates that space is nothing more than a > bunch of qubits in a quantum computer. > > Yousuf Khan What is the source of this "postulate", Yousuf?
From: Raymond Yohros on 9 Jul 2010 14:25 On Jul 9, 1:19 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/9/10 11:58 AM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 6:33 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/8/10 4:19 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > >>> please see my point. i don't mean that there are more neutrinos that > >>> photons. what i mean is that there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING.. > >>> nuclear reactions create proportional (neutrino,photonic) outputs. > >>> photons interact alot more with matter so they stay behind. > >>> neutrinos keep ridding and ridding. they can be in this planet now > >>> and in some other a few minutes later. they are not easy to stop. > >>> photons arriving here are used and reused by baryonic matter in > >>> all types of processes. > > >> Did you pass your English class? > >> Did you pass your physics class? > > > so what, did i say ride wrong? > > im terrible spelling words in any language > > and thats why sometimes i just write how they sound. > > > but please correct my physics > > what do i have wrong? > > > r.y > > What do you mean by, "there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING"? > what is you source of observational data that leads you to this > statement? > they are leptons that do not get trap so easy by nuclei because they are neutrally charged. r.y
From: Sam Wormley on 9 Jul 2010 14:29 On 7/9/10 1:25 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > On Jul 9, 1:19 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/9/10 11:58 AM, Raymond Yohros wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jul 8, 6:33 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 7/8/10 4:19 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: >> >>>>> please see my point. i don't mean that there are more neutrinos that >>>>> photons. what i mean is that there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING. >>>>> nuclear reactions create proportional (neutrino,photonic) outputs. >>>>> photons interact alot more with matter so they stay behind. >>>>> neutrinos keep ridding and ridding. they can be in this planet now >>>>> and in some other a few minutes later. they are not easy to stop. >>>>> photons arriving here are used and reused by baryonic matter in >>>>> all types of processes. >> >>>> Did you pass your English class? >>>> Did you pass your physics class? >> >>> so what, did i say ride wrong? >>> im terrible spelling words in any language >>> and thats why sometimes i just write how they sound. >> >>> but please correct my physics >>> what do i have wrong? >> >>> r.y >> >> What do you mean by, "there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING"? >> what is you source of observational data that leads you to this >> statement? >> > > they are leptons that do not get trap so easy by nuclei > because they are neutrally charged. > > r.y From what observation, do you conclude there should be more. There are trillion passing through your body per second as we post. Why do you think there should be more? What is the source?
From: Raymond Yohros on 9 Jul 2010 14:38 On Jul 9, 1:29 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/9/10 1:25 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 1:19 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/9/10 11:58 AM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > >>> On Jul 8, 6:33 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On 7/8/10 4:19 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > >>>>> please see my point. i don't mean that there are more neutrinos that > >>>>> photons. what i mean is that there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING. > >>>>> nuclear reactions create proportional (neutrino,photonic) outputs. > >>>>> photons interact alot more with matter so they stay behind. > >>>>> neutrinos keep ridding and ridding. they can be in this planet now > >>>>> and in some other a few minutes later. they are not easy to stop. > >>>>> photons arriving here are used and reused by baryonic matter in > >>>>> all types of processes. > > >>>> Did you pass your English class? > >>>> Did you pass your physics class? > > >>> so what, did i say ride wrong? > >>> im terrible spelling words in any language > >>> and thats why sometimes i just write how they sound. > > >>> but please correct my physics > >>> what do i have wrong? > > >>> r.y > > >> What do you mean by, "there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING"? > >> what is you source of observational data that leads you to this > >> statement? > > > they are leptons that do not get trap so easy by nuclei > > because they are neutrally charged. > > > r.y > > From what observation, do you conclude there should be more. > There are trillion passing through your body per second as > we post. Why do you think there should be more? What is the > source? > exactly, and they do not stay. they just keep going! we where talking about photons and neutrinos(and electrons can b included) what particles do you thing are the lone riders? so, there should there be more neutrinos traveling than photons and electrons? r.y
From: Sam Wormley on 9 Jul 2010 14:42
On 7/9/10 1:38 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > On Jul 9, 1:29 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/9/10 1:25 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jul 9, 1:19 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 7/9/10 11:58 AM, Raymond Yohros wrote: >> >>>>> On Jul 8, 6:33 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 7/8/10 4:19 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: >> >>>>>>> please see my point. i don't mean that there are more neutrinos that >>>>>>> photons. what i mean is that there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING. >>>>>>> nuclear reactions create proportional (neutrino,photonic) outputs. >>>>>>> photons interact alot more with matter so they stay behind. >>>>>>> neutrinos keep ridding and ridding. they can be in this planet now >>>>>>> and in some other a few minutes later. they are not easy to stop. >>>>>>> photons arriving here are used and reused by baryonic matter in >>>>>>> all types of processes. >> >>>>>> Did you pass your English class? >>>>>> Did you pass your physics class? >> >>>>> so what, did i say ride wrong? >>>>> im terrible spelling words in any language >>>>> and thats why sometimes i just write how they sound. >> >>>>> but please correct my physics >>>>> what do i have wrong? >> >>>>> r.y >> >>>> What do you mean by, "there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING"? >>>> what is you source of observational data that leads you to this >>>> statement? >> >>> they are leptons that do not get trap so easy by nuclei >>> because they are neutrally charged. >> >>> r.y >> >> From what observation, do you conclude there should be more. >> There are trillion passing through your body per second as >> we post. Why do you think there should be more? What is the >> source? >> > > exactly, and they do not stay. they just keep going! > we where talking about photons and neutrinos(and electrons can b > included) > what particles do you thing are the lone riders? > so, there should there be more neutrinos > traveling than photons and electrons? > > r.y You can't follow the question and digress to random statements. Bye |