Particles Larger Than Galaxies Fill the Universe?
in [Physics]
|
From: Raymond Yohros on 9 Jul 2010 16:10 On Jul 9, 1:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/9/10 1:38 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 1:29 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/9/10 1:25 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > >>> On Jul 9, 1:19 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On 7/9/10 11:58 AM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > >>>>> On Jul 8, 6:33 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 7/8/10 4:19 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > >>>>>>> please see my point. i don't mean that there are more neutrinos that > >>>>>>> photons. what i mean is that there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING. > >>>>>>> nuclear reactions create proportional (neutrino,photonic) outputs.. > >>>>>>> photons interact alot more with matter so they stay behind. > >>>>>>> neutrinos keep ridding and ridding. they can be in this planet now > >>>>>>> and in some other a few minutes later. they are not easy to stop. > >>>>>>> photons arriving here are used and reused by baryonic matter in > >>>>>>> all types of processes. > > >>>>>> Did you pass your English class? > >>>>>> Did you pass your physics class? > > >>>>> so what, did i say ride wrong? > >>>>> im terrible spelling words in any language > >>>>> and thats why sometimes i just write how they sound. > > >>>>> but please correct my physics > >>>>> what do i have wrong? > > >>>>> r.y > > >>>> What do you mean by, "there should be more neutrinos TRAVELING"? > >>>> what is you source of observational data that leads you to this > >>>> statement? > > >>> they are leptons that do not get trap so easy by nuclei > >>> because they are neutrally charged. > > >>> r.y > > >> From what observation, do you conclude there should be more. > >> There are trillion passing through your body per second as > >> we post. Why do you think there should be more? What is the > >> source? > > > exactly, and they do not stay. they just keep going! > > we where talking about photons and neutrinos(and electrons can b > > included) > > what particles do you thing are the lone riders? > > so, there should there be more neutrinos > > traveling than photons and electrons? > > > r.y > > You can't follow the question and digress to random statements. > random statements? what i was saying from the beginning is that neutrinos are the most abundant TRAVELING particles in spacetime. they are not easy to stop. now, if you do not think so, say why? r.y
From: Sam Wormley on 9 Jul 2010 16:17 On 7/9/10 3:10 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > what i was saying from the beginning is that neutrinos > are the most abundant TRAVELING particles in spacetime. > they are not easy to stop. > OK--so there are lots of neutrinos that interact weakly with matter. Probably more so with whatever dark matter is. Lots of photons roaming the universe also.
From: Raymond Yohros on 9 Jul 2010 16:36 On Jul 9, 3:17 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/9/10 3:10 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > what i was saying from the beginning is that neutrinos > > are the most abundant TRAVELING particles in spacetime. > > they are not easy to stop. > > OK--so there are lots of neutrinos that interact weakly > with matter. Probably more so with whatever dark matter > is. Lots of photons roaming the universe also. > what is the truth behind dark matter is the question. if there are more neutrinos roaming than even photons and they oscillate their mass dont you think that is significant enough to account for the dark matter when it comes to particles alone? r.y
From: Sam Wormley on 9 Jul 2010 16:39 On 7/9/10 3:36 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > if there are more neutrinos roaming than even photons > and they oscillate their mass > dont you think that is significant enough to account > for the dark matter when it comes to particles alone? > The observed clumping of dark matter doesn't fit the observed properties of neutrinos.
From: Raymond Yohros on 9 Jul 2010 16:42
On Jul 9, 3:39 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/9/10 3:36 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > > if there are more neutrinos roaming than even photons > > and they oscillate their mass > > dont you think that is significant enough to account > > for the dark matter when it comes to particles alone? > > The observed clumping of dark matter doesn't fit the observed > properties of neutrinos. > so this cannot be explained with BH dynamics? do we need to discover a cold dark matter particle? |