From: Tom on
On Jun 20, 4:28 pm, "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote:
> tom wrote...
>
> Still wasting more of your precious time, I see.  Apparently getting
> in a last word in a pointless exchange is even more important.
>
> ### - hahaha perfect...

I'm glad you agree with my assessment of you.
From: Robert Scott Martin on
[many accounts of enochian chess ignore the role of the die --
the "cube," as they say, must roll]

In article <hvpugn$2h6p$1(a)adenine.netfront.net>,
slider <slider(a)anashram.com> wrote:

>"to return to the place from whence you began and to be 'able' to see it for the
>first time" --t.s. elliot :)

I like this better in the original. It had something to do with the
function of fire.

>### - i mentioned a list of great men (great imho anyway + even included jc) and
>you're talking about puppets in the same context and breath?? hellooooo,
>is there
>anybody in there! :)

Once you're dead, what's left behind is either repurposed or discarded.
"Great" men tend to get repurposed by posterity; those thoughts bear
provenance and that's how you know they were "great." The rest of us are
simply tossed onto the more or less anonymous heap. Either way, somebody's
going to make those leavings dance.

>>> ### - what was that bit about 'my fair lady' (Pygmalion) again?

Heh.

Pygmalion was a clever guy, as they say on Cyprus. But now the puppetmaker
does the dancing on our little stage.

--[]--

I have found that compression is useful in building invulnerable
sentences. Invulnerable sentences are useful when the end of the world is
truly in view. Too many words have the opposite problem.

Use hundred-headed thunder words and not one hundred one-letter words! As
in scrabble, so above.
From: "Bassos" Root on

"Robert Scott Martin" <glass(a)panix.com> wrote in message
news:hvqgd5$nr8$1(a)reader1.panix.com...
> [many accounts of enochian chess ignore the role of the die --
> the "cube," as they say, must roll]
>
> I have found that compression is useful in building invulnerable
> sentences.

Ah, ah challenge :)

> Invulnerable sentences are useful when the end of the world is
> truly in view. Too many words have the opposite problem.

Well, i kinda found it hilarious that (copy paste into word at 12pt
lettersize) a mere response on alt.magick was 120 pages in word.

> Use hundred-headed thunder words and not one hundred one-letter words! As
> in scrabble, so above.

Now if only we could find some way to discover word value :)

Is there something like paragraph value then ?

How bout something like funny-value, boredom-value, content-value,
nonsense-value, inherently-self-contradictory-value, etc.

All ways lead away from rome.


From: "Bassos" Root on

"slider" <slider(a)anashram.com> wrote in message
news:hvr2bh$1nk6$1(a)adenine.netfront.net...
>
> Bassos writes...
>
>>>> Now if only if i could make you suffer for that, so you would realize
>>>> you are
>>>> deluded.
>>>>
>>>> hmmm.
>>>
>>> ### - i suppose you could always try convincing me by putting a little
>>> something in 'my' account heh ;-)
>>
>> Perhaps i should retract that sigar from one's own box first and make you
>> beg me
>> to get that back ?
>
> ### - and maybe there's another draw you haven't found yet ;-)

Heh.

"let's call it a draw".



From: slider on

Robert wrote...

>>"to return to the place from whence you began and to be 'able' to
>>see it for the first time" --t.s. elliot :)
>
> I like this better in the original. It had something to do with the
> function of fire.

### - "once a man twice a child" :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hj905SDn_vE




--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---