Poof !
in [Physics]
|
Prev: ARCTIC OCEAN WARMING, ICEBERGS GROWING SCARCE, WASHINGTON POSTREPORTS [33 scary quotes since 1870]
Next: From Where the WTC Idiocy Starts - Hank the Fired Janitor
From: Tom on 18 Jun 2010 17:57 On Jun 18, 9:16 am, "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote: > > ### - you call it prophecy, i call it probability based on previous track-record > (on history) You are predicting the destruction of the human species and you say your prediction is based on a previous track record in history. Can you point out when in history the destruction of the human species has occurred before?
From: Dr Who Duh on 19 Jun 2010 04:12 On 19/06/2010 5:57 AM, Tom wrote: > On Jun 18, 9:16 am, "slider"<sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote: >> >> ### - you call it prophecy, i call it probability based on previous track-record >> (on history) > > You are predicting the destruction of the human species and you say > your prediction is based on a previous track record in history. Can > you point out when in history the destruction of the human species has > occurred before? thick
From: Tom on 19 Jun 2010 11:14 On Jun 19, 3:38 am, "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote: > Tom writes... > > ### - you call it prophecy, i call it probability based on previous track-record > > (on history) > > You are predicting the destruction of the human species and you say > your prediction is based on a previous track record in history. Can > you point out when in history the destruction of the human species has > occurred before? > > ### - am surprised at you tom as the references were to the fall of previous > 'civilisations' in that there have been at least 22 before (maybe more) and of > which ours is the 23rd or so in the series... A civilization is not a species. Every civilization has been an invention of the same human species. You have no evidence at all of any prior destruction of the human species. You just want to believe it because people don't all do what you think is the right thing to do. You're like a spoiled child who threatens to take his ball and go home, except that it isn't your ball. > prior civilisations being smaller and/or more self contained (read: local) the > paralleling destruction of the human race wasn't ever in question, but with such a > ubiquitous civilisation such as the current one, when one part goes down it > immediately affects all the rest (ref. the credit crunch, in that a problem in one > part was rapidly reflected throughout in double-quick time, ditto sars and the > more recent swine flu...) Or at least so you dearly want to believe. > the point being that 'ours' is the first truly 'global' civilisation, so if one > major part of it falls over then it's likely the rest will rapidly follow suit and > there would be nothing anyone could do about it (i mean we're currently teetering > on the brink of a massive economic collapse which virtually every country on the > planet is working overtime to forestall) Your personal lack of a capacity to survive without supermarkets, credit cards, and social welfare programs isn't evidence that nobody can. Not everyone is a feckless parasite like you. > the question here being, are species disappearing more rapidly now than at 'any' > previous time in planetary history, or not... Not. I understand why you put "any" in quotations. Because there have indeed been lots of events in our planetary history that resulted in greater loss of species but you have chosen to ignore them in order to coddle your malicious wishful thinking. I don't expect any rationality from you on this. It's very clear that you're so angry with life that you sincerely want to die and to take everybody else with you. You're every bit as far off your rocker as some clown who opens fire in a mall, but are too cowardly to do it. Rational thought isn't going to penetrate that much psychological disease.
From: slider on 19 Jun 2010 13:22 Tom wrote... nothing of any consequence... ### - there's only one thing i can possibly say to you tom, someone with more emotion than reason, someone who is obviously mentally ill.... and that is... matt 5.3 + just keep taking the meds mate... and then it's all gonna be alright don't worry ;-) --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Tom on 19 Jun 2010 17:05
On Jun 19, 10:22 am, "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote: > Tom wrote... > > nothing of any consequence... "La, la, la! I can't hear you! I've got my fingers in my ears! La, la, la!" As I said, rational thought doesn't penetrate that much psychological disease. > ### - there's only one thing i can possibly say to you tom, someone with more > emotion than reason, someone who is obviously mentally ill.... "I'm rubber and you're glue!" Did anyone really expect anything else? |