Poof !
in [Physics]
|
Prev: ARCTIC OCEAN WARMING, ICEBERGS GROWING SCARCE, WASHINGTON POSTREPORTS [33 scary quotes since 1870]
Next: From Where the WTC Idiocy Starts - Hank the Fired Janitor
From: Dr Who Duh on 7 Jun 2010 03:55 On 7/06/2010 3:46 PM, Dr Who Duh wrote: > On 6/06/2010 9:40 PM, slider wrote: >> Bassos writes... >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ### - you're wriggling on the hook >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Eh ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Them be fighting words. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ### - well you can fight me if ya want, but you'll be the only >>>>>>>>>> one doin' >>>>>>>>>> all the fightin' hehe >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fightin solo is no fun :( >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is the adrenaline rush of the expectation of violence, and >>>>>>>>> afterwards >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> dissapointment of the actual response :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ### - my kungflu is only for defence thus i never fight, i only >>>>>>>> parry >>>>>>>> (think >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> aikido, the sober version of drunken boxing heh ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In actual physical fighting, i agree, blocking is far more >>>>>>> annoying to any >>>>>>> opponent than doing a one punch knockout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On usenet, that is completely different. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no physical harm at all, so you need to thrust to get >>>>>>> parrys. >>>>>>> (although the one punch knockout still kinda can work, sometimes) >>>>>> >>>>>> ### - it's different but the principles are just about the same: >>>>>> use your >>>>>> opponents own weight + momentum against them ;) >>>>> >>>>> Nah. >>>>> >>>>> That is far too easy. >>>>> >>>>> Punch and follow trough. >>>> >>>> ### - have you ever seen/practiced aikido? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> As i wrote, simply using someone else's momentum is far too easy :) >> >> ### - it's an economy of energy thingy, i.e. why exert oneself unless >> ya have to >> hehe (or, why live your life at 90mph if 40mph will do :) >> > > being a fan of cars and kung fu and extreme violence tarantino would > kick you shoot you and drag you behind a car at 90mph for that. ;) "BECAUSE IT'S SO MUCH FUN, JAN, GET IT!!" lol.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7L2ukSJFgCM it's good empty entertainment.
From: Robert Scott Martin on 7 Jun 2010 17:58 [Glasshopper sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest] >Us Dragons crave solitude. > >Us Dragons are the live at a party. This is interesting in the original apocalyptic context. Say more please ..
From: "Bassos" Root on 8 Jun 2010 08:14 "Robert Scott Martin" <glass(a)panix.com> wrote in message news:hujq1r$sl4$1(a)reader1.panix.com... > [Glasshopper sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest] Fixing a broken Glass-hopper; Carglass :) >>Us Dragons crave solitude. >> >>Us Dragons are the live at a party. > > This is interesting in the original apocalyptic context. Say more please "More". Are you more referencing the massage of the 'v' vs 'f' or more lore stuff ? eg a semicolon after the first the. Us Dragons are the; 'live at a party!' (kind.) As for Dragons being life itself as Tiamat or somesuch, life craving solitude then perhaps means the cyclic nature of existance; eg; breathe in, rest, breathe out, rest.
From: Robert Scott Martin on 8 Jun 2010 15:42 >Us Dragons In article <4c0e3429$0$18274$e4fe514c(a)dreader22.news.xs4all.nl>, Bassos <Root(a)wan (ask me)> wrote: >Fixing a broken Glass-hopper; Carglass :) The one that makes the Glass green and lights the ovens at Belsen.... >Are you more referencing the massage of the 'v' vs 'f' or more lore stuff ? Heh. The mediumistic massage. What draws me up short is the correlation between "dragon" imagery and the "modern life is rubbish" sentiment flickering around the margins of this thread. It's a chord I haven't heard in awhile and it feeds into the idea of a "double dip recession." >As for Dragons being life itself as Tiamat or somesuch, life craving >solitude then perhaps means the cyclic nature of existance; >eg; breathe in, rest, breathe out, rest. Naturally the dragon exhales all the time. It's us who perceive it as "recession" if not fire.
From: "Bassos" Root on 8 Jun 2010 16:39
"Robert Scott Martin" <glass(a)panix.com> wrote in message news:hum6eg$joe$1(a)reader1.panix.com... > >Us Dragons > > In article <4c0e3429$0$18274$e4fe514c(a)dreader22.news.xs4all.nl>, > Bassos <Root(a)wan (ask me)> wrote: > >>Fixing a broken Glass-hopper; Carglass :) > > The one that makes the Glass green and lights the ovens at Belsen.... That is disputed by some german chemist that went there and got imprisoned for publishing scientific results. >>Are you more referencing the massage of the 'v' vs 'f' or more lore stuff >>? > > Heh. The mediumistic massage. With you ? :) > What draws me up short is the correlation between "dragon" imagery and the > "modern life is rubbish" sentiment flickering around the margins of this > thread. It's a chord I haven't heard in awhile and it feeds into the idea > of a "double dip recession." I love modern life. Then again, i do indeed kinda found it a nice challenge to adopt a viewpoint of 'modern life is rubbish'. Watch zombieland :) http://www.kickasstorrents.com/zombieland-2009-dvdrip-xvid-maxspeed-t3160770.html >>As for Dragons being life itself as Tiamat or somesuch, life craving >>solitude then perhaps means the cyclic nature of existance; >>eg; breathe in, rest, breathe out, rest. > > Naturally the dragon exhales all the time. It's us who perceive it as > "recession" if not fire. It's a fire ? (ok ok, no repeat plays for you, ok ok:) The gunas revolve ? (or is that turn ? or rotate ? Rota ? Taro ? wait, this is gettin silly :P) |