From: za kAT on
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:39:54 -0400, za kAT wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:26:28 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>
>> za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in
>> news:4bc62421(a)news.X-Privat.org:
>>
>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:11:43 +0100, Phil wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/04/2010 01:30, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>>> Mark Warner<mhwarner.inhibitions(a)gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:82ciq0FbsmU2 @mid.individual.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just curious. How many here use desktop Linux on a regular basis?
>>>>>> Doesn't need to be your primary platform, but use it enough to
>>>>>> consider yourself a "user".
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh my god....you are trying a feel good recovery now. You are saying
>>>>> "Dudes, help me out here...I'm getting my butt wiped."
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact is Mark that since 1991, Linux has not even garnered a solid
>>>>> 1% of the market share. That is a failure magnificant.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not really.
>>>> Are they going to go broke ?
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Did you take the entire jar of stupid pills?
>>
>> Did you think I was going to leave some?
>
> No John I didn't.

Is your name John?

--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
From: Spamblk on
Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions(a)gmail.com> wrote in
news:82ciq0FbsmU2(a)mid.individual.net:

> Just curious. How many here use desktop Linux on a regular basis?
> D
oesn't need to be your primary platform, but use it enough to consider
> yourself a "user".

+1

Also with Wine 1.1.42.
From: wasbit on

"Craig" <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hq520m$c52$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> On 04/14/2010 04:10 AM, wasbit wrote:
>> Back to the drawing board with PcLinuxOS KDE 2009.2 (previously had the
>> 2007 version). Loaded as a Live Cd OS & then fully installed all within
>> 20 minutes. Took me all of 2 minutes to find where to change the home
>> page. Even though I don't use Vista & W7 at least I can find out how to
>> make simple changes.
>>
>> There is no noticeable difference in speed between the two Operating
>> Systems & for basic tasks this Pc is not much slower than either of my
>> other two dual core rigs.
>
>
> Interesting that Kubuntu took so long, especially the install stage. Were you using the Beta
> (10.04LTS) perhaps?
>

Nope. v9.10 with "the cutting edge KDE 4" according to the download page.

I took the hour install as being the norm for a slower pc until PcLinuxOS showed how quickly it
could be done.

I really only posted for any non Linux lurkers. A newbs experience often has more value to other
newbs.

Regards wasbit



From: Craig on
On 04/14/2010 12:01 PM, Mark Warner wrote:
> And I still get perfectly adequate performance from my PIII-700MHz/512MB
> laptop

Back in December 2008, I retired my P3M-750/684MB Sony Vaio PCG-R505jlk,
bought in late 2001. It ran gOS 3.1 (ubuntu 8.04LTS) and was productive
long after 3 or 4 other, younger lappies had bitten the dust.

Satisfying to say the least.

--
-Craig
From: »Q« on
In <news:Xns9D5DB1967374Ebearbottoms1gmaicom(a)69.16.185.247>,
Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote:

> the way most of the responders to this thread experiment with Linux
> for the fun of it.

It is more fun, isn't it?