From: Phil on
On 11/04/2010 01:18, Mark Warner wrote:
>
> Just curious. How many here use desktop Linux on a regular basis?
> Doesn't need to be your primary platform, but use it enough to consider
> yourself a "user".
>
No
Did once and maybe will again as a 2nd OS
From: Phil on
On 11/04/2010 01:30, Bear Bottoms wrote:
> Mark Warner<mhwarner.inhibitions(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:82ciq0FbsmU2
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>>
>> Just curious. How many here use desktop Linux on a regular basis?
>> Doesn't need to be your primary platform, but use it enough to consider
>> yourself a "user".
>>
>
> Oh my god....you are trying a feel good recovery now. You are saying
> "Dudes, help me out here...I'm getting my butt wiped."
>
> The fact is Mark that since 1991, Linux has not even garnered a solid 1% of
> the market share. That is a failure magnificant.
>

Not really.
Are they going to go broke ?
No.
From: za kAT on
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:11:43 +0100, Phil wrote:

> On 11/04/2010 01:30, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>> Mark Warner<mhwarner.inhibitions(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:82ciq0FbsmU2
>> @mid.individual.net:
>>
>>>
>>> Just curious. How many here use desktop Linux on a regular basis?
>>> Doesn't need to be your primary platform, but use it enough to consider
>>> yourself a "user".
>>>
>>
>> Oh my god....you are trying a feel good recovery now. You are saying
>> "Dudes, help me out here...I'm getting my butt wiped."
>>
>> The fact is Mark that since 1991, Linux has not even garnered a solid 1% of
>> the market share. That is a failure magnificant.
>>
>
> Not really.
> Are they going to go broke ?
> No.

Did you take the entire jar of stupid pills?
--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
From: Nemesis on
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:13:42 +0100, Phil wrote:
> Why no RAR equivalent ?
You have rar, unrar and unrar-free
Or , if you want to pay for it, you can get rar for linux at the
same place you get rar for windows.
Or was it a catch-bears comment ?
> Installing things did NOT run as well as Windows. It WASN'T intuitive.
> Not even close.
> Maybe it's changed in the 4 years since I last tried it, but....
It has.

From: za kAT on
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:26:28 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:

> za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in
> news:4bc62421(a)news.X-Privat.org:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:11:43 +0100, Phil wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/04/2010 01:30, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>> Mark Warner<mhwarner.inhibitions(a)gmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:82ciq0FbsmU2 @mid.individual.net:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just curious. How many here use desktop Linux on a regular basis?
>>>>> Doesn't need to be your primary platform, but use it enough to
>>>>> consider yourself a "user".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh my god....you are trying a feel good recovery now. You are saying
>>>> "Dudes, help me out here...I'm getting my butt wiped."
>>>>
>>>> The fact is Mark that since 1991, Linux has not even garnered a solid
>>>> 1% of the market share. That is a failure magnificant.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not really.
>>> Are they going to go broke ?
>>> No.
>>
>> Did you take the entire jar of stupid pills?
>
> Did you think I was going to leave some?

No John I didn't.
--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com