Steve Jobs: Funniest line of the decade
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Back illumination: The fraud that wimpered
Next: Ebel Classic Steel Mother-of-Pearl Mini Ladies Watch 1215420
From: nospam on 16 May 2010 20:39 In article <h721v51h6ksbrg0r8oeohdkdfl9rsqiq4s(a)4ax.com>, PeteCresswell <x(a)y.Invalid> wrote: > >Apple has already done that. They blocked Google's iPhone app that > >would have allowed free phone calls. > > Skype's working for me. Are it's days numbered? no.
From: nospam on 16 May 2010 20:41 In article <bi31v5l5s96019b3panqa3jn6q9d4a5u3q(a)4ax.com>, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > it's exactly true, and microsoft is still paying the penalties. > > The penalties to which you refer have nothing to do with Apple's failure to > improve market share. yes it does. that's what abuse of monopoly means.
From: Mxsmanic on 16 May 2010 20:53 nospam writes: > yes it does. that's what abuse of monopoly means. The article mentions specific practices and says nothing about Apple. Apple lost the game because Steve Jobs felt he had a higher calling than just making money. He wanted to start a religion, not a revenue stream. He more or less got his wish.
From: nospam on 16 May 2010 20:58 In article <pp41v51j3pq3m6k2t54der6npc1ufgt0dl(a)4ax.com>, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > yes it does. that's what abuse of monopoly means. > > The article mentions specific practices and says nothing about Apple. doesn't need to. it affected the industry. > Apple lost the game because Steve Jobs felt he had a higher calling than just > making money. He wanted to start a religion, not a revenue stream. He more or > less got his wish. steve jobs wasn't at apple during that time.
From: Mxsmanic on 16 May 2010 22:58
nospam writes: > doesn't need to. it affected the industry. It affected a few players in certain ways. It made no difference for Apple. > steve jobs wasn't at apple during that time. When the Mac was invented? |