From: nospam on
In article <4bee2040$0$1649$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer
<rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote:

> > Even Microsoft has
> >sided with Jobs.
>
> Notice that Flash works quite well on Windows systems.

so why would microsoft say flash will go away one day?
From: nospam on
In article <4bee208a$0$1649$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer
<rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote:

> >except that many of those free flash games are designed for a
> >mouse/keyboard,
>
> Except that many games could easily be modofied to work on a touch
> screen.

so just rewrite them as native apps and make them even better.

> If Apple allowed it.

buy something else if flash is important. there isn't even a mobile
flash yet to include, even if apple wanted it.
From: Ray Fischer on
nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Ray Fischer <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote:
>
>> > Even Microsoft has
>> >sided with Jobs.
>>
>> Notice that Flash works quite well on Windows systems.
>
>so why would microsoft say flash will go away one day?

Maybe because Microsoft wants to provide the replacement?

Hmmm?

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: Ray Fischer on
nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Ray Fischer <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote:

>> >except that many of those free flash games are designed for a
>> >mouse/keyboard,
>>
>> Except that many games could easily be modofied to work on a touch
>> screen.
>
>so just rewrite them as native apps and make them even better.

Do you have any idea why that's a stupid idea?

Tell us: Native for what platform?

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: nospam on
In article <4bee238c$0$1640$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer
<rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote:

> >so why would microsoft say flash will go away one day?
>
> Maybe because Microsoft wants to provide the replacement?

they specifically said html5, not silverlight.