The Big Bang Theory Big Blunder: An Open Letter to Closed Minds
in [Relativity]
|
From: Albertito on 30 Sep 2009 05:46 On Sep 30, 10:31 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Albertito wrote: > > An Open Letter to Closed Minds > >http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html > > *giggle* > > I love some of the signatories: > > Arp, Baryshev, Lerner, Marmet, *TOM VAN FLANDERN*... > > But not as much as the intensely naive belief that an open letter of vented > bile coupled with a high schooler's grasp of the subject is sufficient to > dislodge a wildly successful scientific theory. Dear Eric Gisse, You forgot the funniest part. That letter is sponsored and backed by the sect named Parkway Church of Christ, Ahahahahahahahahaha :-) > > > > > I apologize for my possibly rude words, > > but Einstein's Relativity (both SR & GR) > > along with the Big Bang Theory are all > > > B U L L S H I T ! > > > and > > > D E F E C A T I O N ! > > > the biggest damage to the advance of > > science ever!
From: Dirk Van de moortel on 30 Sep 2009 06:03 eric gisse wrote: > Albertito wrote: > >> An Open Letter to Closed Minds >> http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html > > *giggle* > > I love some of the signatories: > > Arp, Baryshev, Lerner, Marmet, *TOM VAN FLANDERN*... > > But not as much as the intensely naive belief that an open letter of > vented bile coupled with a high schooler's grasp of the subject is > sufficient to dislodge a wildly successful scientific theory. More fun on http://www.s8int.com/index.html | "So, no we don�t believe the universe is millions or billions of years old. | We don�t know how old it is�we just know who created it and how | long it took Him. We do not believe in pre-Adamic races, though we do | believe that there were �civiilizations� prior to the Flood. We don�t | believe in space aliens or cooties. We expect you to use your own | knowledge filter on this site." Dirk Vdm
From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez on 30 Sep 2009 06:28 Albertito wrote on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:13:56 -0700: > On Sep 29, 8:06 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" > <dirkvandemoor...(a)nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote: >> Albertito <albertito1...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> f5be94af-7f2e-4aee-b04a-67ad61e2b...(a)o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com >> >> Empty minds were not invited here. >> >> Dirk Vdm > > Then, why is this forum full of relativists? Maybe because sci.physics.relativity is about relativity? Just an idea... -- http://www.canonicalscience.org/ BLOG: http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencetoday.html
From: Albertito on 30 Sep 2009 06:37 On Sep 30, 11:28 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez <juanREM...(a)canonicalscience.com> wrote: > Albertito wrote on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:13:56 -0700: > > > On Sep 29, 8:06 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" > > <dirkvandemoor...(a)nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Albertito <albertito1...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >> f5be94af-7f2e-4aee-b04a-67ad61e2b...(a)o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com > > >> Empty minds were not invited here. > > >> Dirk Vdm > > > Then, why is this forum full of relativists? > > Maybe because sci.physics.relativity is about relativity? Just an idea... NONSENSE. You are wrong, as usual, sci.physics.relativity is NOT about relativity, but about RELIGION spiced with ad hominem arguments. :-D > > --http://www.canonicalscience.org/ > > BLOG:http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalscienceto...
From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez on 30 Sep 2009 07:03
Albertito wrote on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:39:00 -0700: > On Sep 29, 6:33 pm, "Juan R." González-Álvarez > <juanREM...(a)canonicalscience.com> wrote: >> Albertito wrote on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:59:06 -0700: >> >> > An Open Letter to Closed Minds >> >http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html >> >> There is several difficulties with the big bang theory. This is known >> for specialists not so for laymen as you. >> >> However, some of the alternatives proposed in that letter (as the >> steady state model) are not longer pursued even by their fathers >> because they were proved to disagree with observation [#]. >> >> Once said this, you are again a PRETENDER! > > You are the PRETENDER, because you managed to learn some physics and > mathematical skills, you think you are superb and can judge for what is > wrong, nonsense, correct or incorrect. You are a dangerous troll that > exploits scientism to debunk people. Your sectarianism to pseudo-science > is a patent fact. Canonicalscience.com is a destructive sect, and you > are one of its priests. You suffer from materialistic and reductionist > ideas, that make you a loser and an unhappy coward. Your weak health is > an expression of your mystified ideas, not only about physics and > chemistry, but any field in life. Being a self-proclaimed theoretical > physicist as you is the patent self-proclamation of a pedantic, pompous > troll who lacks creativity and courage. > > :-D You are the PRETENDER, because you do NOT managed to learn some physics and mathematical skills, you think you are superb and can judge for what is wrong, nonsense, correct or incorrect. You are a dangerous troll that exploits internet to debunk people. Your sectarianism to Albertito-religion is a patent fact. your geocities and knol sites form a destructive sect, and you are the only one of its priests. You suffer from persecution paranoia and unability to understand that you are not so smart as you believed, that make you a loser and an unhappy coward. Your weak meantal health is an expression of your mystified ideas, not only about physics and chemistry, but any field in life. Being a self-proclaimed quantum gravity theoretician as you is the patent self-proclamation of a pedantic, pompous troll who lacks creativity to do some any minimally decent theory and courage to accept his large list of incorrect claims. Moreover, furied by your solitary status as internet crackpot, you pretend now to dissisiparately search support for some of your idiocies from scientists and so but, of course, you are lying. :-D >> They do not support neither your irrational attacks on SR nor your >> IDIOTIC pseudo-theories. >> >> > I apologize for my possibly rude words, but Einstein's Relativity >> > (both SR & GR) along with the Big Bang Theory are all >> >> > B U L L S H I T ! >> >> > and >> >> > D E F E C A T I O N ! >> >> > the biggest damage to the advance of >> > science ever! >> >> [#] Hoyle now promotes a quasi-steady state that accepts some elements >> from >> the big bang theory. >> >> --http://www.canonicalscience.org/ >> >> BLOG:http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalscienceto... -- http://www.canonicalscience.org/ BLOG: http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencetoday.html |