The Big Bang Theory Big Blunder: An Open Letter to Closed Minds
in [Relativity]
|
From: mpc755 on 29 Sep 2009 18:03 On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 29, 2:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 29, 2:16 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sep 29, 11:02 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 29, 11:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 29, 10:54 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 11:49 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 10:45 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 6:59 am, Albertito <albertito1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > An Open Letter to Closed Mindshttp://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html > > > > > > > > > > I apologize for my possibly rude words, > > > > > > > > > but Einstein's Relativity (both SR & GR) > > > > > > > > > along with the Big Bang Theory are all > > > > > > > > > > B U L L S H I T ! > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > D E F E C A T I O N ! > > > > > > > > > > the biggest damage to the advance of > > > > > > > > > science ever! > > > > > > > > > The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. > > > > > > > > MPC got tired of replying to himself and is in need of some attention. > > > > > > > He won't talk to Phil Bouchard about it, either. > > > > > > > The universe is not expanding. It is, or the local universe is in, a > > > > > > jet stream. > > > > > > Derive from your jet stream idea the value of the Hubble constant.. > > > > > The universe, or our local universe, has the following shape: > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#Geodesics > > > > > The magnetic plane is simply where we cannot get information from. > > > > This is the event horizon of the universe, or the local universe, jet > > > > stream. > > > > > It appears as though the universe is expanding because everything is > > > > 'expanding' relative to where we are and are moving through the jet > > > > stream. > > > > Notice that you didn't calculate the Hubble constant. > > > I realize if something does not fit your ignorance, it is incorrect. > > Hmmm... looks like English, makes no sense.... > > > > > The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. > > Which is a useless statement for making any predictions. It is only useless for someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as yourself.
From: YBM on 29 Sep 2009 18:06 mpc755 wrote: > [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as > yourself. You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. It will fit perfectly.
From: mpc755 on 29 Sep 2009 18:22 On Sep 29, 4:04 pm, Glirdita <patriciale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 29, 12:02 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > It appears as though the universe is expanding >because everything is 'expanding' relative to where we >are and are moving through the jet stream. > > That is not the real reason for the red shift in the color of light > coming to us from distant locations; which is taken as due to the > recessional velocities of the sources wrt us. As said elsewhere in > this newsgroup, the reason for the red shift is that, as the Compton > effect experimentally proved, when light transits an atom all or SOME > of its energy is absorbed and the rest continue on with a bit less e > remaining. Therefore the further an s-d node travels and the more > atoms it interacts with the less energy it will have as it continues > onward in all directions until some of it eventually "fits" the > pattern of the atom it happens to be transiting through. When that > happens a whole quantum of energy will be absorbed and no s-d > imbalance will remain. (The "quantum of energy" so absorbed is equal > to hv, where h is a constant but v is the frequency of the interacting > bit of light RELATIVE TO THE ATOM Not exactly sure how this fits into what you are saying, but this image of the 'big bang' is close to being accurate: http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html There is also a very good video about the formation of the 'stuff' in the universe that is linked from the homepage (http://aether.lbl.gov/ index.html): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c64Aia4XE1Y&feature=related I especially like the homepage address. If you take the image of the 'big bang' and you were to wrap it around the image of the universe containing the rindler horizon, you would have a pretty accurate image of the universe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#Geodesics If you wrap the first image of the 'big bang' around either of the following two images, you may get a better idea of what I am trying to convey: http://www.feandft.com/BlackHole.jpg http://huntersofthecloud.com/images/HuntersofTheCloudmagfield.gif In the above image the gray area moving with the black hole is the Rindler Horizon. The red lines are what we consider to be the 'big bang'.
From: mpc755 on 29 Sep 2009 18:33 On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > mpc755 wrote: > > [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as > > yourself. > > You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. > > It will fit perfectly. No, I'm willing to look at the experimental evidence and make open minded judgments as to how best the concepts and theories support the evidence. The simple fact QM has to say a C-60 molecule enters and exits both slits when you do not look for it, is enough nonsense for me to realize the QM explanation of what is occurring in nature is incorrect. The C-60 molecule is always detected entering and exiting a single slit because it always enters and exits a single slit.
From: mpc755 on 29 Sep 2009 18:35
On Sep 29, 4:04 pm, Glirdita <patriciale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 29, 12:02 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > It appears as though the universe is expanding >because everything is 'expanding' relative to where we >are and are moving through the jet stream. > > That is not the real reason for the red shift in the color of light > coming to us from distant locations; which is taken as due to the > recessional velocities of the sources wrt us. As said elsewhere in > this newsgroup, the reason for the red shift is that, as the Compton > effect experimentally proved, when light transits an atom all or SOME > of its energy is absorbed and the rest continue on with a bit less e > remaining. Therefore the further an s-d node travels and the more > atoms it interacts with the less energy it will have as it continues > onward in all directions until some of it eventually "fits" the > pattern of the atom it happens to be transiting through. When that > happens a whole quantum of energy will be absorbed and no s-d > imbalance will remain. (The "quantum of energy" so absorbed is equal > to hv, where h is a constant but v is the frequency of the interacting > bit of light RELATIVE TO THE ATOM Not exactly sure how this fits into what you are saying, but this image of the 'big bang' is close to being accurate: http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html There is also a very good video about the formation of the 'stuff' in the universe that is linked from the homepage (http://aether.lbl.gov/ index.html): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c64Aia4XE1Y&feature=related I especially like the homepage address. If you take the image of the 'big bang' and superimpose it around the 'jet stream' in the rindler horizon image, you have a pretty accurate image of the universe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#Geodesics If you superimpose the first image above of the 'big bang' around either of the jet streams in the following two images, you get a better idea of what I am trying to convey: http://www.feandft.com/BlackHole.jpg http://huntersofthecloud.com/images/HuntersofTheCloudmagfield.gif In the above image the gray area moving with the black hole is the Rindler Horizon. The red lines are what we consider to be the 'big bang'. |