The Big Bang Theory Big Blunder: An Open Letter to Closed Minds
in [Relativity]
|
From: PD on 29 Sep 2009 18:41 On Sep 29, 5:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > > > mpc755 wrote: > > > [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as > > > yourself. > > > You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. > > > It will fit perfectly. > > No, I'm willing to look at the experimental evidence and make open > minded judgments as to how best the concepts and theories support the > evidence. > > The simple fact QM has to say a C-60 molecule enters and exits both > slits when you do not look for it, is enough nonsense for me to > realize the QM explanation of what is occurring in nature is > incorrect. As YBM said, you've described yourself well. Dismissing something as nonsense before considering the evidence is what normal people call "closed-minded". > > The C-60 molecule is always detected entering and exiting a single > slit because it always enters and exits a single slit.
From: YBM on 29 Sep 2009 18:43 mpc755 a �crit : > On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >> mpc755 wrote: >>> [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as >>> yourself. >> You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. >> >> It will fit perfectly. > > No, [nonsense] It was rethorical! How dumb are you? I knew you won't!
From: mpc755 on 29 Sep 2009 18:47 On Sep 29, 6:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 29, 5:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > > > > mpc755 wrote: > > > > [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as > > > > yourself. > > > > You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. > > > > It will fit perfectly. > > > No, I'm willing to look at the experimental evidence and make open > > minded judgments as to how best the concepts and theories support the > > evidence. > > > The simple fact QM has to say a C-60 molecule enters and exits both > > slits when you do not look for it, is enough nonsense for me to > > realize the QM explanation of what is occurring in nature is > > incorrect. > > As YBM said, you've described yourself well. Dismissing something as > nonsense before considering the evidence is what normal people call > "closed-minded". > That is inaccurate. I considered it, but it makes no sense to the C-60 molecule creating a displacement wave in the aether. > > > > The C-60 molecule is always detected entering and exiting a single > > slit because it always enters and exits a single slit. > >
From: mpc755 on 29 Sep 2009 18:48 On Sep 29, 6:43 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > mpc755 a écrit : > > > On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > >> mpc755 wrote: > >>> [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as > >>> yourself. > >> You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. > > >> It will fit perfectly. > > > No, [nonsense] > > It was rethorical! How dumb are you? I knew you won't! What you do not understand is the C-60 molecule is creating a displacement wave in the aether, so the nonsense of QM is unnecessary. But lets not go there. The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream.
From: mpc755 on 29 Sep 2009 18:50
On Sep 29, 6:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 29, 5:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > > > > mpc755 wrote: > > > > [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as > > > > yourself. > > > > You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. > > > > It will fit perfectly. > > > No, I'm willing to look at the experimental evidence and make open > > minded judgments as to how best the concepts and theories support the > > evidence. > > > The simple fact QM has to say a C-60 molecule enters and exits both > > slits when you do not look for it, is enough nonsense for me to > > realize the QM explanation of what is occurring in nature is > > incorrect. > > As YBM said, you've described yourself well. Dismissing something as > nonsense before considering the evidence is what normal people call > "closed-minded". > That is inaccurate. I considered it, but it makes no sense when compared to the C-60 molecule creating a displacement wave in the aether. > > > > The C-60 molecule is always detected entering and exiting a single > > slit because it always enters and exits a single slit. > > |