The Big Bang Theory Big Blunder: An Open Letter to Closed Minds
in [Relativity]
|
From: YBM on 29 Sep 2009 21:26 mpc755 a �crit : > On Sep 29, 7:35 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >> mpc755 a �crit : >> >> >> >>> On Sep 29, 7:24 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>> On Sep 29, 7:21 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:13 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 6:43 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> mpc755 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as >>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>> You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>> It will fit perfectly. >>>>>>>>>>> No, [nonsense] >>>>>>>>>> It was rethorical! How dumb are you? I knew you won't! >>>>>>>>> What you do not understand is the C-60 molecule is creating a >>>>>>>>> displacement wave in the aether, so the nonsense of QM is unnecessary. >>>>>>>>> But lets not go there. >>>>>>>>> The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. >>>>>>>> Mantra mode, again? >>>>>>> If that's what it takes. >>>>>>> [snip nonsense] >>>>>> I didn't ask for more mantra. Thanks for confirming anyway. >>>>> [more nonsense] >>>> Why did you double confirm? We all know you're a nut. >>> [same nonsense] >> Triple confirm? Why? > > [same nonsense] You lack integrity.
From: mpc755 on 29 Sep 2009 21:31 On Sep 29, 9:26 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > mpc755 a écrit : > > > > > On Sep 29, 7:35 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > >> mpc755 a écrit : > > >>> On Sep 29, 7:24 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > >>>> mpc755 a écrit : > >>>>> On Sep 29, 7:21 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > >>>>>> mpc755 a écrit : > >>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:13 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > >>>>>>>> mpc755 a écrit : > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 6:43 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> mpc755 a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> mpc755 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as > >>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself. > >>>>>>>>>>>> You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. > >>>>>>>>>>>> It will fit perfectly. > >>>>>>>>>>> No, [nonsense] > >>>>>>>>>> It was rethorical! How dumb are you? I knew you won't! > >>>>>>>>> What you do not understand is the C-60 molecule is creating a > >>>>>>>>> displacement wave in the aether, so the nonsense of QM is unnecessary. > >>>>>>>>> But lets not go there. > >>>>>>>>> The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. > >>>>>>>> Mantra mode, again? > >>>>>>> If that's what it takes. > >>>>>>> [snip nonsense] > >>>>>> I didn't ask for more mantra. Thanks for confirming anyway. > >>>>> [more nonsense] > >>>> Why did you double confirm? We all know you're a nut. > >>> [same nonsense] > >> Triple confirm? Why? > > > [same nonsense] > > You lack integrity. This image of the 'big bang' is close to being accurate: http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html There is also a very good video about the formation of the 'stuff' in the universe that is linked from the homepage (http://aether.lbl.gov/ index.html): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c64Aia4XE1Y&feature=related I especially like the homepage address. If you take the image of the 'big bang' and superimpose it around the 'jet stream' in the rindler horizon image, you have a pretty accurate image of the universe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#Geodesics If you superimpose the first image above of the 'big bang' around either of the jet streams in the following two images, you get a better idea of what I am trying to convey: http://www.feandft.com/BlackHole.jpg http://huntersofthecloud.com/images/HuntersofTheCloudmagfield.gif In the above image the gray area moving with the black hole is the Rindler Horizon. The red lines are what we consider to be the 'big bang'.
From: YBM on 29 Sep 2009 21:44 mpc755 a �crit : > On Sep 29, 9:26 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >> mpc755 a �crit : >> >> >> >>> On Sep 29, 7:35 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>> On Sep 29, 7:24 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:21 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:13 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 6:43 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mpc755 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will fit perfectly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, [nonsense] >>>>>>>>>>>> It was rethorical! How dumb are you? I knew you won't! >>>>>>>>>>> What you do not understand is the C-60 molecule is creating a >>>>>>>>>>> displacement wave in the aether, so the nonsense of QM is unnecessary. >>>>>>>>>>> But lets not go there. >>>>>>>>>>> The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. >>>>>>>>>> Mantra mode, again? >>>>>>>>> If that's what it takes. >>>>>>>>> [snip nonsense] >>>>>>>> I didn't ask for more mantra. Thanks for confirming anyway. >>>>>>> [more nonsense] >>>>>> Why did you double confirm? We all know you're a nut. >>>>> [same nonsense] >>>> Triple confirm? Why? >>> [same nonsense] >> You lack integrity. > > [again same nonsense] You should consult.
From: doug on 29 Sep 2009 22:58 mpc755 wrote: > On Sep 29, 8:39 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > >>mpc755 wrote: >> >>>On Sep 29, 8:08 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> >>>>mpc755 wrote: >> >>>>>On Sep 29, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>mpc755 wrote: >> >>>>>>>On Sep 29, 6:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>On Sep 29, 5:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>mpc755 wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>[...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as >>>>>>>>>>>yourself. >> >>>>>>>>>>You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. >> >>>>>>>>>>It will fit perfectly. >> >>>>>>>>>No, I'm willing to look at the experimental evidence and make open >>>>>>>>>minded judgments as to how best the concepts and theories support the >>>>>>>>>evidence. >> >>>>>>>>>The simple fact QM has to say a C-60 molecule enters and exits both >>>>>>>>>slits when you do not look for it, is enough nonsense for me to >>>>>>>>>realize the QM explanation of what is occurring in nature is >>>>>>>>>incorrect. >> >>>>>>>>As YBM said, you've described yourself well. Dismissing something as >>>>>>>>nonsense before considering the evidence is what normal people call >>>>>>>>"closed-minded". >> >>>>>>>The evidence is the C-60 molecule always enters and exits a single >>>>>>>slit, because it is always detected entering and exiting a single >>>>>>>slit. You have to ignore the experimental evidence which fits your >>>>>>>ignorance. >> >>>>>>No, you are trying to lie about what the experiment says in order >>>>>>to fit your prejudices. Why do you think lying helps your case? >> >>>>>>>When I first heard of the double slit experiment it was obvious the >>>>>>>particle was creating a displacement wave in the aether and the >>>>>>>displacement wave created interference when exiting the slits, >>>>>>>altering the direction the particle travels. This description of the >>>>>>>observed behaviors is supported by the experimental evidence. >> >>>>>>Except that it is not and you are lying again. >> >>>>>Why is it not? >> >>>>Because you are lying about what the experiments showed. >> >>>What am I lying about? >> >>We have gone over this before. Reread the experiment. Or >>search your previous posts. >> > > > You lack integrity. Amazing that you say this since you are the one lying about what the experiments say. > > >> >>>>>>>I see no reason to consider nonsense. >> >>>>>>You seem to prefer lying to thinking. >> >>>>>>>>>The C-60 molecule is always detected entering and exiting a single >>>>>>>>>slit because it always enters and exits a single slit. >> >> >
From: doug on 29 Sep 2009 22:59
YBM wrote: > mpc755 a �crit : > >> On Sep 29, 9:26 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >> >>> mpc755 a �crit : >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sep 29, 7:35 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:24 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:21 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:13 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 6:43 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mpc755 a �crit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mpc755 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] someone who prefers to remain ignorant such as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd better post this next time you'll answer to yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will fit perfectly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, [nonsense] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was rethorical! How dumb are you? I knew you won't! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What you do not understand is the C-60 molecule is creating a >>>>>>>>>>>> displacement wave in the aether, so the nonsense of QM is >>>>>>>>>>>> unnecessary. >>>>>>>>>>>> But lets not go there. >>>>>>>>>>>> The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mantra mode, again? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If that's what it takes. >>>>>>>>>> [snip nonsense] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I didn't ask for more mantra. Thanks for confirming anyway. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [more nonsense] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why did you double confirm? We all know you're a nut. >>>>>> >>>>>> [same nonsense] >>>>> >>>>> Triple confirm? Why? >>>> >>>> [same nonsense] >>> >>> You lack integrity. >> >> >> [again same nonsense] > > > You should consult. The astonishing part is that MPC will go on like this forever. Even if no one answers him, he will continue to answer himself. He got up to about ten or twelve replies to himself one time before someone broke in. I have been hoping to see him get to twenty. |