Prev: Stephen Hawking and Two Physical Times
Next: Aether is a physical substance
From: Carlo Vitali on 10 Apr 2010 03:44
On Apr 5, 10:28 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 9:58 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > As for me
>
> > > the Doppler effect
> > > is an immediate disprove of the
> > > E=hf
>
> > Except it doesn't.  Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent
>
> > > as  the definition is a single smallest photon energy !!
>
> > Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of smaller
> > photons with a fixed frequencies and energy.
>
> > Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of smaller
> > energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy?
>
> > > (ps
> > > this issue is only for cleaver honest
> > > creative  people
> > > ie not for  crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...)
>
> > So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook.
>
> ----------------------
> (:-)
> and that anonymous psychopath imbecile
> Inertial = ARTFUL  == ???
> is the   example to  creatures whom
> i am not going  to discuss  with !!
> 2
> since i don t believe in spoon feeding
> can anyone
> of the other readers guess
> why i claim the above ??
>
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ---------------------

Sweetheart don't loose your temper when people doesn't agree with you
Galielei never did that he kept saying "though it moves!" Carlo
From: Y.Porat on 11 Apr 2010 05:15
On Apr 5, 9:55 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> As for me
>
> the Doppler effect
> is an immediate disprove of the
> E=hf
> as  the definition is a single smallest photon energy !!
>
> (ps
>  this issue is only for cleaver honest
> creative  people
> ie not for  crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...)
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> --------------------

so

if a photon with energy
E=hf1
entered the observers frame
and was red shifted
ie because E=hf2
while f2 > f1
so we have apparently
a loss of energy
(as if energy is not conserved)
so if we what to keep the conservation of energy
iron law
some of that energy is still hidden
so
WHERE IS THAT MISSING ENERGY
STILL HIDING !!! (:-)
TIA
Y.Porat
------------------------
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Stephen Hawking and Two Physical Times
Next: Aether is a physical substance