The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: BradGuth on 30 Aug 2007 20:22 On Aug 9, 12:34 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Bob Myers wrote: > > "BradGuth" <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote > > > > Why are you against a Hummer/SUV that gets 100 empg and creates zero > > >NOx? > > > You find a practical way to move a real-world three-ton wheeled > > vehicle 100 miles on a gallon-of-gas-equivalent, and I guarantee > > you you'll have PLENTY of people's attention. > > > But you don't really have that, do you? > > He also doesn't have anyhydrogenperoxide wells. And no, I don't have the > faintest clue why he's obsessional about it either. > > Graham You're going naysay postal, arnt you. Figures, doesn't it. - Brad Guth
From: BradGuth on 30 Aug 2007 20:30 On Aug 10, 7:49 am, MooseFET <kensm...(a)rahul.net> wrote: > On Aug 9, 10:40 am, "Bob Myers" <nospample...(a)address.invalid> wrote: > > > "BradGuth" <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:1186676826.644798.326820(a)z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > > > > Why are you against a Hummer/SUV that gets 100 empg and creates zero > > >NOx? > > > You find a practical way to move a real-world three-ton wheeled > > vehicle 100 miles on a gallon-of-gas-equivalent, and I guarantee > > you you'll have PLENTY of people's attention. > > > But you don't really have that, do you? > > That was done years ago. Unfortunately, it results in an average speed > of about 15MPH. On level ground, the friction losses can be made low > enough at low speeds to get very long ranges out of a small amount of > gas. So, once again foiled by your status quo or bust conditional laws of physics. Why of course is isn't going to happen because, I'm not a Yid. How about yourself? - Brad Guth
From: BradGuth on 30 Aug 2007 20:38 On Aug 10, 8:19 pm, "Bob Myers" <nospample...(a)address.invalid> wrote: > "MooseFET" <kensm...(a)rahul.net> wrote in message > > news:1186757375.298576.231300(a)q4g2000prc.googlegroups.com... > > >> You find a practical way to move a real-world three-ton wheeled > >> vehicle 100 miles on a gallon-of-gas-equivalent, and I guarantee > >> you you'll have PLENTY of people's attention. > > >> But you don't really have that, do you? > > > That was done years ago. Unfortunately, it results in an average speed > > of about 15MPH. On level ground, the friction losses can be made low > > enough at low speeds to get very long ranges out of a small amount of > > gas. > > Yeah, but that's where the "practical" qualifier comes in. > I really doubt that you'd find many people willing to accept > limiting their driving to 15 MPH on level ground with special > low-rolling-resistance tires, etc.. > > In other words - "special demo" sorts of examples don't > count. > > Bob M. Up to 1000 shp of hybrid energy under that Hummer hood should do a little better than 15 mph. I was using up that gallon of whatever and h2o2 at 65 mph, fully loaded and accomplishing 100 mpg upon average at zero NOx. At 15 mph on the smooth and flat, it should be good for at least 250 mpg (possibly 300 mpg), as well as zero NOx. Sorry if you didn't understand. - Brad Guth
From: BradGuth on 30 Aug 2007 20:42 On Aug 13, 6:25 pm, "rlbell.ns...(a)gmail.com" <rlbell.ns...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 9, 10:27 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 9, 8:26 am, Charlie Edmondson <edmond...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > > > > BradGuth wrote: > > > > On Aug 8, 5:47 pm, RichD <r_delaney2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > >>On Jul 28, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>This is another reason why hybrids make more sense. Pure EVs > > > >>>>>>have too many limitations. > > > > >>>>>If they could recharge in 10 mins, the US power grid would burn out > > > > >>>>What about these? > > > >>>>http://altairnano.com/markets_amps.html > > > > >>>Shockingly expensive. $75,000 per vehicle just for batteries. > > > >>>http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/07/altair_nanotech.html > > > > >>Expensive, who cares? We're talking about the > > > >>ENVIRONMENT, we can't worry about filty lucre. > > > >>What are you, a greedy Republican? > > > > >>Let the gov't fund it, won't cost a farthing! That's > > > >>why we need visionaries like Al Gore, bold men > > > >>not afraid to take on the special interests, leading > > > >>by example. > > > > >>-- > > > >>Rich > > > > > How much cheap h2o2 would you like for your electric cars? > > > > > How about a Hummwe/SUV at zeroNOxand 100 empg? > > > > - Brad Guth > > > > Brad, > > > Just go away now. This ain't SEH where you have a couple of logical > > > engineers around, this is SED where the REAL engineers will tear you a > > > new one! > > > > Charlie > > > Why are you Yiddish folks so deathly afraid of allowing any surplus of > > the 100% renewable energy, as for such clean energy going into the > > productions of LH2 and h2o2? > > > Why are you against a Hummer/SUV that gets 100 empg and creates zero > >NOx? > > - Brad Guth > > As someone who understands what it might take to get a Hummer or SUV > to 100 empg and zeroNOx, I want a Hummer/SUV that can seat at least > one person, accelerate from zero to sixty mph in less than thirty > seconds, and not crumple if I inadvertantly lean against it. > > There are only two ways to produce useful amounts of LH2 and H2O2, > economically-- new coal generation and new nuclear generation. While > I personally want the latter, thanks to wrongheaded environmentalists, > the former is more likely. You're absolutely joking, right! I to guess you're not being from Earth imposes a great number of limitations on the scope of your intelligence. What silly planet of such all-knowing naysayism did you say you were from? - Brad Guth
From: BradGuth on 30 Aug 2007 20:47
On Aug 13, 6:25 pm, "rlbell.ns...(a)gmail.com" <rlbell.ns...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > There are only two ways to produce useful amounts of LH2 and H2O2, > economically-- new coal generation and new nuclear generation. While > I personally want the latter, thanks to wrongheaded environmentalists, > the former is more likely. Have you not heard of Warren Buffet or Willie Moo? If that's not good enough, I've got energy footprints of 40 kw/m2. How many clean teraWatts would you like? - Brad Guth |