The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 31 Aug 2007 22:23 Sevenhundred Elves wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > BradGuth wrote: > > > > > Up to 1000 shp of hybrid energy under that Hummer hood should do a > > > little better than 15 mph. > > > > You're a Grade-A IDIOT ! > > Please, such comments are of no use at all. They're as much use as any other response where 'Brad Gruth' is concerned. > Instead, what Brad needs to understand is that there are some major > flaws in his plan to make H2O2 in the vehicle while it is on the road. > > The flaw that's easiest to point out is this: > > It takes energy to convert water to H2O2, and this energy would have to > be brought along in the car somehow. But if you already have a way of > bringing the energy along, it is an unnecessary complication to use it > to convert water to H2O2 and then use that H2O2 to fuel the car. It > would be easier and more energy-efficient to use that stored energy to > fuel the car directly. Your mistake is to assume the 'Brad Gruth' gives a damn about any of the above or even remotely vares about the science. He doesn't. I (along with many others) have tried to understand his ideas and explain his errors but quite simply he doesn't care. He is wedded to his stupid h2o2 ideas (and the 1000hp Hummer) come rain or shine. Graham
From: Sevenhundred Elves on 1 Sep 2007 03:32 Eeyore wrote: > > > Sevenhundred Elves wrote: > > > Eeyore wrote: > > > BradGuth wrote: > > > > > > > Up to 1000 shp of hybrid energy under that Hummer hood should do a > > > > little better than 15 mph. > > > > > > You're a Grade-A IDIOT ! > > > > Please, such comments are of no use at all. > > They're as much use as any other response where 'Brad Gruth' is concerned. > > > > Instead, what Brad needs to understand is that there are some major > > flaws in his plan to make H2O2 in the vehicle while it is on the road. > > > > The flaw that's easiest to point out is this: > > > > It takes energy to convert water to H2O2, and this energy would have to > > be brought along in the car somehow. But if you already have a way of > > bringing the energy along, it is an unnecessary complication to use it > > to convert water to H2O2 and then use that H2O2 to fuel the car. It > > would be easier and more energy-efficient to use that stored energy to > > fuel the car directly. > > Your mistake is to assume the 'Brad Gruth' gives a damn about any of the above > or even remotely cares about the science. He doesn't. I (along with many others) > have tried to understand his ideas and explain his errors but quite simply he > doesn't care. He is wedded to his stupid h2o2 ideas (and the 1000hp Hummer) come > rain or shine. I can, of course, only hope that he cares to ponder what I said above. Brad, did you read it, and did you find it has any bearing on your ideas? S.
From: BradGuth on 1 Sep 2007 13:29 On Aug 31, 7:23 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Your mistake is to assume the 'Brad Gruth' gives a damn about any of the above > or even remotely vares about the science. He doesn't. I (along with many others) > have tried to understand his ideas and explain his errors but quite simply he > doesn't care. He is wedded to his stupid h2o2 ideas (and the 1000hp Hummer) come > rain or shine. > > Graham In other words, you and others of your naysay kind don't believe in the regular laws of physics or in the best available science. We understand, perfectly. - Brad Guth
From: BradGuth on 1 Sep 2007 13:34 On Aug 31, 6:43 pm, Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhund...(a)elves.invalid> wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > >BradGuthwrote: > > > > Up to 1000 shp of hybrid energy under that Hummer hood should do a > > > little better than 15 mph. > > > You're a Grade-A IDIOT ! > > Please, such comments are of no use at all. > > Instead, what Brad needs to understand is that there are some major > flaws in his plan to make H2O2 in the vehicle while it is on the road. ??? "on the road" ??? (are you nuts?) > > The flaw that's easiest to point out is this: > > It takes energy to convert water to H2O2, and this energy would have to > be brought along in the car somehow. But if you already have a way of > bringing the energy along, it is an unnecessary complication to use it > to convert water to H2O2 and then use that H2O2 to fuel the car. It > would be easier and more energy-efficient to use that stored energy to > fuel the car directly. > > S. My goodness, naysayism is taken to a new and improved level, of your being dumb and dumber (aka dumbfounded) way past the point of no possible return. Even your out-of-context is out of context. Good grief, are you not from Earth? - Brad Guth
From: BradGuth on 1 Sep 2007 13:41
On Aug 31, 6:25 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > All your teraWatts are belong to us! Yes they do, though like Warren Buffet's clean and renewable teraWatts, they're not free for the taking, that is unless such energy is owned by a Muslim (unlike our resident LLPOF warlord, I'm just kidding). - Brad Guth |