The Great $Pricelessware $Racket
in [Freeware]
|
From: Craig on 1 Oct 2009 10:05 On 10/01/2009 02:24 AM, Me.Here wrote: > On 1/10/2009 5:05 PM, Craig wrote: >> On 09/30/2009 11:22 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>> On 1/10/2009 3:47 PM, Craig wrote: >>>> On 09/30/2009 10:08 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>> On 1/10/2009 2:36 PM, Craig wrote: >>>>>> On 09/30/2009 07:07 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/10/2009 9:57 AM, whistleblower wrote: >>>>>>>> --The Great $Pricelessware $Racket-- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is the story of Pricelessware which you won't find >>>>>>>> on the Pricelessware website: www.pricelesswarehome.org >>>>>>>> ___________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> // snipped for brevity // >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - regards from your friendly whistleblower - :-) >>>>>>>> - 1 September 2009 - >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> it's all true >>>>>> >>>>>> Either you didn't read it, didn't understand it or are lying. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I read it, I understood it and I agree with it. Lying played no >>>>> part in >>>>> my post... >>>> >>>> OK, let's assume I misunderstood. >>>> >>>>> [Ron May] is fond of sending abuse reports (LARTS) to newsserver >>>>> admins to get dissenters' posting accounts closed. >>>> >>> >>> Very True. >> >> This is your lie, plain & simple. It's also instructive you omitted the >> other citation. >> > > So far, you have failed to back up your claim of me being a liar. On the contrary. *You* made the accusation. It is incumbent on *you* to produce evidence. You cannot because you know it doesn't exist. And you know it. You lied. That you won't own up to it is none of my concern. -- -Craig
From: Me.Here on 1 Oct 2009 11:24 On 2/10/2009 12:05 AM, Craig wrote: > On 10/01/2009 02:24 AM, Me.Here wrote: >> On 1/10/2009 5:05 PM, Craig wrote: >>> On 09/30/2009 11:22 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>> On 1/10/2009 3:47 PM, Craig wrote: >>>>> On 09/30/2009 10:08 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>>> On 1/10/2009 2:36 PM, Craig wrote: >>>>>>> On 09/30/2009 07:07 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/10/2009 9:57 AM, whistleblower wrote: >>>>>>>>> --The Great $Pricelessware $Racket-- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is the story of Pricelessware which you won't find >>>>>>>>> on the Pricelessware website: www.pricelesswarehome.org >>>>>>>>> ___________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> // snipped for brevity // >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - regards from your friendly whistleblower - :-) >>>>>>>>> - 1 September 2009 - >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it's all true >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Either you didn't read it, didn't understand it or are lying. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I read it, I understood it and I agree with it. Lying played no >>>>>> part in >>>>>> my post... >>>>> >>>>> OK, let's assume I misunderstood. >>>>> >>>>>> [Ron May] is fond of sending abuse reports (LARTS) to newsserver >>>>>> admins to get dissenters' posting accounts closed. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Very True. >>> >>> This is your lie, plain & simple. It's also instructive you omitted the >>> other citation. >>> >> >> So far, you have failed to back up your claim of me being a liar. > > On the contrary. *You* made the accusation. It is incumbent on *you* to > produce evidence. You cannot because you know it doesn't exist. And you > know it. > What accusation? I agreed with the OP and then you asked a question. I answered, now it is up to YOU to prove me wrong. We all know you can't because it's in black and white so this is the standard bullshit reply all noobs like you sprout when you know you lost the argument. IT IS FACT - deal with it and no, I'm not going to waste MY time on something I already know to be correct. -- MH
From: Me.Here on 1 Oct 2009 11:29 On 2/10/2009 1:12 AM, streamdream(a)kilobits&merseydotes.??? wrote: > whistleblower<blowing.the.whistle(a)pricelessware.net> wrote in > news:af8563c7a319a237bbedc79d3cbf8157(a)msgid.frell.theremailer.net: > >> 3.List of URLS to download PWH/PL ISOs from �Q�'s server: >> _________________________________________________________ >> >> Pricelessware Website CD.ISOs available for download: >> >> PL2008: >> http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/PL2008CD1.iso >> http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/PL2008CD2.iso >> MD5 checksums: >> http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/PL2008CDs.md5 >> >> >> PL2007: http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/PL2007CD.iso >> PL2006: http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/PL2006CD.iso >> PL2005: http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/PL2005CD.iso >> PL2004: http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/PL2004CD.iso >> MD5 checksums: >> http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/PL2004567CDs.md5 >> > > > If these are free to download and aren't being sold, nor is there a fee to > those that download them, where is the problem? Are you saying that > they shouldn't be compiled because of the various EULA's involved? I believe that's the case. Some of the EULA's no doubt don't allow redistribution, hence, the illegality of the above action. Personally, I don't use PW for anything nor am I ever likely. I prefer to source and test software myself (or write it myself). Occasionally I may ask members of ACF what they use so I can research the various option myself. -- MH
From: Lew on 1 Oct 2009 12:55 On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:36:14 -0700, Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:47:22 -0700, Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote: >>>> // snipped for brevity // >>> >>> Either you didn't read it, didn't understand it or are lying. >>> >> Craig forget trying to reason with Wheretonow. He is chief boot licker and #1 Cult member in the BearBDoll Cult. Lew
From: Lew on 1 Oct 2009 12:57
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:24:40 +1000, "Me.Here" <me.here(a)home.on.the.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> // snipped for brevity // >What accusation? I agreed with the OP and then you asked a question. I >answered, now it is up to YOU to prove me wrong. We all know you can't >because it's in black and white so this is the standard bullshit reply >all noobs like you sprout when you know you lost the argument. IT IS >FACT - deal with it and no, I'm not going to waste MY time on something >I already know to be correct. #1 BearBDoll bootlicker has spoken. It must be so. Lew |