The Great $Pricelessware $Racket
in [Freeware]
|
From: Craig on 1 Oct 2009 18:52 On 10/01/2009 08:24 AM, Me.Here wrote: > On 2/10/2009 12:05 AM, Craig wrote: >> On 10/01/2009 02:24 AM, Me.Here wrote: >>> On 1/10/2009 5:05 PM, Craig wrote: >>>> On 09/30/2009 11:22 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>> On 1/10/2009 3:47 PM, Craig wrote: >>>>>> On 09/30/2009 10:08 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/10/2009 2:36 PM, Craig wrote: >>>>>>>> On 09/30/2009 07:07 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2009 9:57 AM, whistleblower wrote: >>>>>>>>>> --The Great $Pricelessware $Racket-- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is the story of Pricelessware which you won't find >>>>>>>>>> on the Pricelessware website: www.pricelesswarehome.org >>>>>>>>>> ___________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> // snipped for brevity // >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - regards from your friendly whistleblower - :-) >>>>>>>>>> - 1 September 2009 - >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> it's all true >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Either you didn't read it, didn't understand it or are lying. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I read it, I understood it and I agree with it. Lying played no >>>>>>> part in >>>>>>> my post... >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, let's assume I misunderstood. >>>>>> >>>>>>> [Ron May] is fond of sending abuse reports (LARTS) to newsserver >>>>>>> admins to get dissenters' posting accounts closed. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Very True. >>>> >>>> This is your lie, plain & simple. It's also instructive you omitted the >>>> other citation. >>>> >>> >>> So far, you have failed to back up your claim of me being a liar. >> >> On the contrary. *You* made the accusation. It is incumbent on *you* to >> produce evidence. You cannot because you know it doesn't exist. And you >> know it. >> > > What accusation? The lie that you're propagating is the accusation. -- -Craig
From: Craig on 1 Oct 2009 18:54 On 10/01/2009 08:29 AM, Me.Here wrote: > Some of the EULA's no doubt don't allow redistribution Accusation w/o proof, because there is *no* proof. Yet another lie from the sock. -- -Craig
From: Craig on 1 Oct 2009 19:28 On 10/01/2009 04:06 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote: > Craig<netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in > news:ha3bqu$kd1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >> On 10/01/2009 08:24 AM, Me.Here wrote: >>> On 2/10/2009 12:05 AM, Craig wrote: >>>> On 10/01/2009 02:24 AM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>> On 1/10/2009 5:05 PM, Craig wrote: >>>>>> On 09/30/2009 11:22 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/10/2009 3:47 PM, Craig wrote: >>>>>>>> On 09/30/2009 10:08 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2009 2:36 PM, Craig wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 09/30/2009 07:07 PM, Me.Here wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2009 9:57 AM, whistleblower wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> --The Great $Pricelessware $Racket-- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is the story of Pricelessware which you won't find >>>>>>>>>>>> on the Pricelessware website: www.pricelesswarehome.org >>>>>>>>>>>> ___________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> // snipped for brevity // >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - regards from your friendly whistleblower - :-) >>>>>>>>>>>> - 1 September 2009 - >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> it's all true >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Either you didn't read it, didn't understand it or are lying. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I read it, I understood it and I agree with it. Lying played no >>>>>>>>> part in >>>>>>>>> my post... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, let's assume I misunderstood. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [Ron May] is fond of sending abuse reports (LARTS) to >>>>>>>>> newsserver admins to get dissenters' posting accounts closed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Very True. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is your lie, plain& simple. It's also instructive you >>>>>> omitted the other citation. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So far, you have failed to back up your claim of me being a liar. >>>> >>>> On the contrary. *You* made the accusation. It is incumbent on *you* >>>> to produce evidence. You cannot because you know it doesn't exist. >>>> And you know it. >>>> >>> >>> What accusation? >> >> The lie that you're propagating is the accusation. >> > > It is not a lie, and I agree with it also. It's simple, BB. Prove the allegation. Point to it. But you can't. Or, is it that you are only demand justice when it serves /your/ interests? -- -Craig
From: Craig on 1 Oct 2009 19:57 On 10/01/2009 04:54 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote: > It is proven in the archives. It's black & white, BB. Either you can prove it or you can't. But if you can't, your assertion becomes a lie. No surprise there, though. It wouldn't be the first one you've committed in this group. -- -Craig
From: Mark Warner on 1 Oct 2009 21:19
Bear Bottoms wrote: > Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in > news:ha3flq$iaj$2(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >> On 10/01/2009 04:54 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote: >>> It is proven in the archives. >> It's black & white, BB. Either you can prove it or you can't. But if >> you can't, your assertion becomes a lie. No surprise there, though. >> It wouldn't be the first one you've committed in this group. >> > > Like I said, it is proven. Get that in your thick head. There is nothing > left to prove. The PWH cult is here and is as stated. The proof is > vividly displayed in the archives of this group, posted about many > times, and demonstrated real time in these threads and the misuse of the > group is being demontrated real time in this group via the [PL] threads. > > Your snide comments do not equate truth. Your denial that evidence is > not evidence is silly. You deny PWH is operating in ACF? You deny the > PWH cult assaults non-believers? You deny the PWH cult assaults authors > and freeware developers? You deny PWH has ruined the reputation of this > group? You deny Susan actuated a hostile takeover from Genna? Deny all > you like...it is fact as represented by mounds of proof archived > forever. > > This is ACF, not Pricelessware. Time to adjust your meds again. -- Mark Warner MEPIS Linux Registered Linux User #415318 ....lose .inhibitions when replying |