The coming Linux shakeout
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: Warning: Adobe Flash Player is now bundleware and most likelyadware.
Next: Static edit selection in photo viewer/editor?
From: Franklin on 18 Jun 2010 12:16 Chris Millbank (also known as Hummingbird) forged this "za kAT" post: > Franklin the FORGER, SOCKPUPPET, NYM-SWITCHER wrote: > >>As an example, here are some posts for May 15th and 16th 2010. >> >> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0669/Bottoms_sock> >> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0272/Bottoms_sock_page2> > > > H^H^H^H^H^ You are mistaken Franklinslime, as usual. I haven't seen > a single post from "David W" this year. > > za kAT Hi Chris, you're right about my typo. I wrote "last year" but then wrote "2010" instead of "2009". Sorry if I confused you. Here's the corrected version. ---------------------- Dear Bottoms, could you kindly help me understand if there is an explanation I may have overlooked about the way in which you and the sockpuppet "David W" were posting a year ago? As an example, here are some posts for May 15th and 16th 2009. <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0696/Bottoms_sock> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0227/Bottoms_sock_page2> It it pure co-incidence when a group of 13 posts are made under the name "Bear Bottoms", then seconds later a group of 20 posts are made under "David W", then immediately afterwards 10 more posts are made under "Bear Bottoms", quickly followed by 18 posts under "David W". (There's more but I'll stop here.) Clearly there is a close connection between posts made under the name "Bear Bottoms" and those made under the name "David W". Could you let me know what your explanation is? Thank you. Franklin PS: I'd be grateful if you could answer this as "Bear Bottoms" rather than through a sock. ----------------------
From: Jim Davis on 18 Jun 2010 20:30 Franklinslime wrote this: >"I wrote "last year" but then wrote "2010" instead of "2009". LIAR. What you actually wrote to BB: "...you and the sockpuppet "David W" were posting a year ago?" But thanks for correcting your fantasy slime. Corrected fantasy slime is always better than uncorrected fantasy slime. Wouldn't you agree? Jim Davis lol -- "You have been targeted for denigration"
From: Franklin on 20 Jun 2010 12:19 Jim Davis wrote: > Franklinslime wrote this: > >>"I wrote "last year" but then wrote "2010" instead of "2009". > > > LIAR. What you actually wrote to BB: > > "...you and the sockpuppet "David W" were posting a year ago?" > > > But thanks for correcting your fantasy slime. Corrected fantasy > slime is always better than uncorrected fantasy slime. Wouldn't you > agree? > > > Jim Davis > lol > Below is what I just wrote. Sorry if you got confused. ---------------------- Dear Bottoms, could you kindly help me understand if there is an explanation I may have overlooked about the way in which you and the sockpuppet "David W" were posting a year ago? As an example, here are some posts for May 15th and 16th 2009. <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0696/Bottoms_sock> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0227/Bottoms_sock_page2> It it pure co-incidence when a group of 13 posts are made under the name "Bear Bottoms", then seconds later a group of 20 posts are made under "David W", then immediately afterwards 10 more posts are made under "Bear Bottoms", quickly followed by 18 posts under "David W". (There's more but I'll stop here.) Clearly there is a close connection between posts made under the name "Bear Bottoms" and those made under the name "David W". Could you let me know what your explanation is? Thank you. Franklin PS: I'd be grateful if you could answer this as "Bear Bottoms" rather than through a sock. ----------------------
From: Jim Davis on 21 Jun 2010 04:28 Franklin <email.franklin(a)yahoo.com.sg> wrote: >"Below is what I just wrote." - Exactly: "what you JUST WROTE". But it isn't what you originally wrote is it, hence my previous post pointing out your error. I thought that would have been pretty obvious, even to a monkey. >"Sorry if you got confused." - Whatever gives you the idea that I got confused? Your error was quite straightforward and easy to spot. Too bad you wriggled and squirmed when it was pointed out to you. [snip boring repeat of Franklin's detective analysis] Browsing through the archives about this incident, I can see you were asked to provide full details of ALL posts by the two named persons for the periods covered, to exclude the possibility that you deviously only listed those that appeared to prove your sock allegation... ...AND you were also presented with several possible explanations for the posting coincidences. However, I can see NO replies from you with any such information. In fact when you were challenged, you rapidly disappeared altogether only to re-appear later on and later on making the same allegations. Why is that??? Is it because you are unable to substantiate your allegations? and they are nothing more than trivial nonsense wrapped up as solid proven facts? Is it actually the case that you are manipulating a simple coincidence into a slam-dunk proven case where you are the investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury? Do tell :-) PS: your track record at claiming who is who and who is a sock/forgery of who etc etc scores about 5 on a scale of 1-100 from what I've read in the archives. You get really obsessed with snippets and blow them up out of all proportion. >Thank you. >Franklin You're welcome. I'm glad I could help with explaining your problem. >PS: I'd be grateful if you could answer this as "Bear Bottoms" rather >than through a sock. Whatever makes you think that I am Bear Bottoms? Is this another one of your imagined theories? They come thick and fast... Jim Davis lol -- "You have been targeted for denigration"
From: Franklin on 23 Jun 2010 13:31
Jim Davis wrote: > Franklin <email.franklin(a)yahoo.com.sg> wrote: > >>"Below is what I just wrote." > > - Exactly: > > [trimmed] Here is what Mr Bottoms is having difficulty in understanding. I'm sorry if it has confused you too. ---------------------- Dear Bottoms, could you kindly help me understand if there is an explanation I may have overlooked about the way in which you and the sockpuppet "David W" were posting a year ago? As an example, here are some posts for May 15th and 16th 2009. <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0696/Bottoms_sock> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0227/Bottoms_sock_page2> It it pure co-incidence when a group of 13 posts are made under the name "Bear Bottoms", then seconds later a group of 20 posts are made under "David W", then immediately afterwards 10 more posts are made under "Bear Bottoms", quickly followed by 18 posts under "David W". (There's more but I'll stop here.) Clearly there is a close connection between posts made under the name "Bear Bottoms" and those made under the name "David W". Could you let me know what your explanation is? Thank you. Franklin PS: I'd be grateful if you could answer this as "Bear Bottoms" rather than through a sock. ---------------------- |