Prev: Warning: Adobe Flash Player is now bundleware and most likelyadware.
Next: Static edit selection in photo viewer/editor?
From: Jim Davis on 23 Jun 2010 18:12 Franklin, you seem to have a reading and comprehension problem. Perhaps John Stubbings and you can help each other because he's also got one. [snip Franklin's repeated comments] I regret that ignoring requests made of you to provide additional evidence to support your latest allegation won't get you out of the hole you've dug yourself into. Let's try again: Here's part of what was written to you previously on this subject: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Browsing through the archives about this incident, I can see you were asked to provide full details of ALL posts by the two named persons for the periods covered, to exclude the possibility that you deviously only listed those that appeared to prove your sock allegation... ..AND you were also presented with several possible explanations for the posting coincidences. However, I can see NO replies from you with any such information. In fact when you were challenged, you rapidly disappeared altogether only to re-appear later on and later on making the same allegations. Why is that??? Is it because you are unable to substantiate your allegations? and they are nothing more than trivial nonsense wrapped up as solid proven facts? Is it actually the case that you are manipulating a simple coincidence into a slam-dunk proven case where you are the investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury? Do tell :-) PS: your track record at claiming who is who and who is a sock/forgery of who etc etc scores about 5 on a scale of 1-100 from what I've read in the archives. You get really obsessed with snippets and blow them up out of all proportion. Jim Davis lol ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Davis |