From: Jim Davis on

Franklin, you seem to have a reading and comprehension problem. Perhaps
John Stubbings and you can help each other because he's also got one.

[snip Franklin's repeated comments]

I regret that ignoring requests made of you to provide additional
evidence to support your latest allegation won't get you out of the
hole you've dug yourself into.

Let's try again:
Here's part of what was written to you previously on this subject:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Browsing through the archives about this incident, I can see you were
asked to provide full details of ALL posts by the two named persons for
the periods covered, to exclude the possibility that you deviously only
listed those that appeared to prove your sock allegation...

..AND you were also presented with several possible explanations for
the posting coincidences. However, I can see NO replies from you with
any such information. In fact when you were challenged, you rapidly
disappeared altogether only to re-appear later on and later on making
the same allegations.

Why is that???
Is it because you are unable to substantiate your allegations? and they
are nothing more than trivial nonsense wrapped up as solid proven facts?

Is it actually the case that you are manipulating a simple coincidence
into a slam-dunk proven case where you are the investigator, prosecutor,
judge and jury? Do tell :-)

PS: your track record at claiming who is who and who is a sock/forgery
of who etc etc scores about 5 on a scale of 1-100 from what I've read
in the archives. You get really obsessed with snippets and blow them up
out of all proportion.

Jim Davis
lol
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Jim Davis